Re: Loading maildir slave is very slow

2014-09-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:47:43PM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > Yes, I have the .journal there. Maybe, I have not correctly moved the > data from one disk to another. I simply moved the maildir and than > created a symlink from the old location to the new one, hoping that > mbsync does not notice t

Re: [PATCH] implement gssapi support

2014-09-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:00:16PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Yes, I have tried and I'm getting: > ... > Authenticating with SASL mechanism GSSAPI... > Error: SASL provided no authentication data. > Error: (null) > damn. do you have time to help debug it? i need at least the mbsync -V output. tra

Re: Loading maildir slave is very slow

2014-09-09 Thread Michal Sojka
On Tue, Sep 09 2014, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:25:07PM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: >> after moving my maildirs from SSD to rotating disk it takes mbsync very >> long time (several hours) to load a maildir (mbsync prints "Loading >> slave..." message). The maildir in ques

Re: [PATCH] implement gssapi support

2014-09-09 Thread Jan Synacek
Oswald Buddenhagen writes: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:02:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: >> Oswald Buddenhagen writes: >> >On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:29:52AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: >> >> Here's second version of my patch. I decided to kind of revive (I >> >> cleaned it up a lot) the original

Re: Loading maildir slave is very slow

2014-09-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:25:07PM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > after moving my maildirs from SSD to rotating disk it takes mbsync very > long time (several hours) to load a maildir (mbsync prints "Loading > slave..." message). The maildir in question has about 80 messages. I > looked what take

Re: [PATCH] implement gssapi support

2014-09-09 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:02:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Oswald Buddenhagen writes: > >On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:29:52AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > >> Here's second version of my patch. I decided to kind of revive (I > >> cleaned it up a lot) the original sasl branch. Since the SASL suppor