Re: Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-26 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 8:33 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:23:35PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 5:42 AM Oswald Buddenhagen > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:52:23AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > &

Re: Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 5:42 AM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:52:23AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 8:28 PM Oswald Buddenhagen > > wrote: > >> no, you're not. the use of "instead" would make no sense at

Re: Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 8:28 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 05:45:19PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:17 PM Oswald Buddenhagen > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 02:03:24PM -0500, Felipe Contreras w

Re: Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:17 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 02:03:24PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:04 PM Oswald Buddenhagen > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:44:29PM -0500, Felipe

Re: Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:04 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:44:29PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Path ~/mail/ > > MapInbox inbox > > Inbox ~/mail/inbox > > SubFolders Verbatim > > > >However, it doesn't work, ~/

Does MapInbox work?

2021-06-03 Thread Felipe Contreras
ildir is used. If I specify Inbox then it works correctly (I have an inbox inside ~/mail/). What's the purpose of MapInbox then? Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras ___ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-20 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 06:36:52PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:29:01AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:29:01AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:35:44PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-16 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:35:44PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:30:08AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-15 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:30:08AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:06:08AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:06:08AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:05:04AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-12 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:05:04AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > this is now done in the maxmessages branch. >> > the option is called ExpireUnread yes/no > >> you s

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-11 Thread Felipe Contreras
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 06:30:19AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > >> A simpler and saner approach to deal with the problem is to simply > > >> throw a warning: "Ther

Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: set am foreign flag

2013-11-06 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:40:02AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:28:23PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: set am foreign flag

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:28:23PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> We are missing stuff required for GNU packages. >> > which would be? Run autoreconf and you would see. http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ma

[PATCH 0/2] build: trivlal improvements

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
Felipe Contreras (2): build: set am foreign flag build: use autoreconf autogen.sh | 7 +-- configure.ac | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4.2+fc1 -- November Webinars for C, C

[PATCH 2/2] build: use autoreconf

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
This has been the correct way since a long time. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- autogen.sh | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/autogen.sh b/autogen.sh index 9480c36..cb038e8 100755 --- a/autogen.sh +++ b/autogen.sh @@ -1,7 +1,2 @@ #! /bin/sh -set -e

[PATCH 1/2] build: set am foreign flag

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
We are missing stuff required for GNU packages. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 479fff3..3096eb0 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ AC_INIT([isync

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:52:35AM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:37:43PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:37:43PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > there are three levels of "noticing" messages: [...] >> >> [..

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:17:15PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:36:11PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:36:11PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I'm giving this a try, and so far it does indeed work, but only for >> some folders. It seems to me that the folders that fail are the ones >>

Re: [request for testing] Re: [commit] branch 'maxmessages' created

2013-11-04 Thread Felipe Contreras
s only sync up to MaxMessages, and leave the rest untouched. Thanks for the work so far. I might give a try to hash out the issues too, is there any part of the code that you have an eye on? -- Felipe Contreras -- An

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-27 Thread Felipe Contreras
portant is that I have 32.5 MBps download capacity, and 7 Mbps > upload capacity. I have 20 Mbps download and 2.5 Mbps upload. > How is this comparing with what you are seeing? If I do the same I get: mbsync gmail-test 1.14s user 0.38s system 3% cpu 5

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:54:28PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >>> After I fetched the whole label I realized that offlineimap does also >>&g

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:54:28PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> After I fetched the whole label I realized that offlineimap does also >> take a long long time, and is synchronizing all the flags. It's >>

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
of deleting some > local messages on every sync. Something like MaxMessages working during the > first sync would be a huge step forward. That's actually what I want: first I want to download a limited amout of mails, a

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Maxim Vuets wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Maxim Vuets wrote: >>> I'd really like to understand what is the underlying problem and why >>> offlineimap

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Pushing the updates is not the problem for me, as it's usually a >> couple of messages that get updated, it's fetching them. Even if >>

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-01 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Maxim Vuets wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:39:03PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > ... >>Which works reasonably fast, but if I read something in Gmail, it >>doesn't get marked as read locally. >> >>If I do 'Sync Pull

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-10-01 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Maxim Vuets wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:59:30AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >>I switched away from offlineimap when I got a synchronization issue >>and had to re-download all my mail, and it took forever. Then mbsync >>was m

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-09-30 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Gammel Holte wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:39:03PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >

Re: Synchronizing flags

2013-09-29 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:39:03PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Is there a way to update the flags locally fast? >> > not really, and i don't see how the problem could be generally avoided. > you may get s

Synchronizing flags

2013-09-29 Thread Felipe Contreras
ng in Gmail, it doesn't get marked as read locally. If I do 'Sync PullNew PullFlags Push' then the local flags are updated, but it takes a long looong time to complete. Is there a way to update the flags locally fast? What am I missing?

Re: isync and gmail

2013-04-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
it's the only issue preventing me to go full mbsync+notmuch. Right now I'm using the web interface and other mail tools to go through a huge chunk of unread mail spread over several huge folders. I also know this is the only l

[PATCH] maildir: fix trash path double-free

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
It should be freed at the very end. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- src/drv_maildir.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/drv_maildir.c b/src/drv_maildir.c index 629da10..78b6c19 100644 --- a/src/drv_maildir.c +++ b/src/drv_maildir.c @@ -162,7 +162,6

Re: isync and gmail

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
sages which it thinks you have not seen, yet. > unfortunately, it does not consider read messages seen. :}" > > I still don't get the whole picture, though. I'd be very grateful if > you could point out how to

[PATCH 2/2] Fix build and modernize configure.ac

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
7;am_cv_prog_cc_stdc', but upon 'ac_cv_prog_cc_stdc'. configure.ac:3: warning: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE: two- and three-arguments Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- configure.ac | 17 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac inde

[PATCH 1/2] Rename configure.in to the modern equivalent

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
Fixes: aclocal: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not 'configure.in' Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- configure.in => configure.ac | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename configure.in => configure.ac (100%) d

Re: isync and gmail

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
@ maildir_cleanup( store_t *gctx ) ctx->db->close( ctx->db, 0 ); #endif /* USE_DB */ free( ctx->trash ); - free( gctx->path ); free( ctx->excs ); if (ctx->uvfd >= 0) close( ctx->uvfd ); -- Felipe Contreras

Is there a way to fetch mails partially? (after a certain date)

2013-04-07 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I have too much mail, and I often don't want to download the whole folder, just the last 100 or so, or after certain point in time. I've looked everywhere I don't see any option of this, or even somebody asking for it, so here it is. Any ideas? -- F

Re: Issue with subdir patterns

2011-01-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:37:10PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:04:56PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >>

Re: Issue with subdir patterns

2011-01-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:04:56PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I started to have server-side filters (MS Exchance) to put mail into >> directories such as "INBOX/bugs", however, mbsync doesn't seem

Issue with subdir patterns

2011-01-13 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I started to have server-side filters (MS Exchance) to put mail into directories such as "INBOX/bugs", however, mbsync doesn't seem to recognize those patterns, is there anything special I should do? Pattern "INBOX" "INBOX/bugs" V