Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
>> I searched for the message on the slave, and I could not find it.
>>
> i seriously cannot see how that can happen.
> i suppose you retried the sync a few times, and got the duplicate UID
> failure each time?
No, as soon as I saw the error I stopped synchronizing. As
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 05:14:39PM +0200, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> > what does the "completely deleted" refer to? the slave or the master?
> > if it's the master, then it's most likely because the message simply was
> > not propagated due to the error. you need to fix the
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:34:26AM +0200, Alan Schmitt wrote:
>> I tried setting up mbsync this week-end, and it worked well except for
>> one big thing. I tried moving a message from my inbox to some other
>> mailbox, and during the next synchronization I got the foll
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:34:26AM +0200, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> I tried setting up mbsync this week-end, and it worked well except for
> one big thing. I tried moving a message from my inbox to some other
> mailbox, and during the next synchronization I got the following error.
>
> ,
> | Maild
Hello,
I tried setting up mbsync this week-end, and it worked well except for
one big thing. I tried moving a message from my inbox to some other
mailbox, and during the next synchronization I got the following error.
,
| Maildir error: duplicate UID 49.
`
The problem is that the message
