[iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms (was: Converting Non-Editable Pdfs to Editable pdfs)

2008-06-06 Thread Bruno Lowagie
Sr. Miguel wrote: I have an eye on the iTextsharp forum also, to see if Paulo will say something about that :) OK. However, and maybe Leonard can answer this if he read it, I don´t know if changing a PDF extended form with non Adobe tools will be or not a licence violation. I don't know

Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms (was: Converting Non-Editable Pdfs to Editable pdfs)

2008-06-06 Thread Leonard Rosenthol
On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Bruno Lowagie wrote: However, and maybe Leonard can answer this if he read it, I don´t know if changing a PDF extended form with non Adobe tools will be or not a licence violation. I don't know for sure, but iText doesn't change the original form. It doesn't

Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms (was: Converting Non-Editable Pdfs to Editable pdfs)

2008-06-06 Thread Sr. Miguel
Ok, thank you! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:30:46 -0400To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms (was: Converting Non-Editable Pdfs to Editable pdfs) On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Bruno Lowagie wrote: However, and maybe Leonard can answer this if he

Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms

2008-06-06 Thread Bruno Lowagie
Sr. Miguel wrote: Ok, thank you! Still, it's strange that a question about a possible license violation by iText changed into a possible license violation by Adobe. I don't really like the fact that Adobe USES iText and doesn't expose the jar files to their customers. I just don't understand

Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms

2008-06-06 Thread Sr. Miguel
No, it isn´t. Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:27:00 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Reader Enabled forms Sr. Miguel wrote:Ok, thank you! Still, it's strange that a question about a possible license violation by iText changed