Dnia 24-10-2007, Śr o godzinie 07:41 +0200, emmanuel giraud pisze:
> > I have a question about a way to implement of clustering in
> jabberd2.
> > Why don't we use software open source that run clusters?
> > It may be stupid but what's your opinion?
> > Why do you developp another solutions made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
emmanuel giraud schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about a way to implement of clustering in jabberd2.
>> Why don't we use software open source that run clusters?
>> It may be stupid but what's your opinion?
>>
>> Why do you developp another sol
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about a way to implement of clustering in jabberd2.
> Why don't we use software open source that run clusters?
> It may be stupid but what's your opinion?
>
> Why do you developp another solutions made by others?
>
> http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/
>
> There are a
Ryan Pugatch wrote:
> Harald Braumann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:00:08 +0200
>> Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dnia 22-10-2007, Pn o godzinie 15:03 -0400, Ryan Pugatch pisze:
>>>
>>>
Yes, I did a make clean. Backtrace just has a bunch of s
Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:00:08 +0200
> Tomasz Sterna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Dnia 22-10-2007, Pn o godzinie 15:03 -0400, Ryan Pugatch pisze:
>>
>>> Yes, I did a make clean. Backtrace just has a bunch of stuff like:
>>>
>>> #0 0x0030 in ?? ()
>>> #1 0x
Hi,
I've to upgrade a really old 2.0 installation to the current version.
Now since then the DB schema has changed and BerkeleyDB is used.
Does it somehow work automagically, if I upgrade and still use the
existing DB? If not, is there some way to upgrade the DB?
Another thing: whenever the SM o
Dnia 23-10-2007, Wt o godzinie 03:19 +0200, Harald Braumann pisze:
> Hm, but even if glibc is stripped, there has to be one function in
> this
> back trace that's inside sm and thus should be printed.
>
> Also, there are 256 lines in the bt. How do you get so
> many nested function calls? AFAIK ja
