On 2018-04-18 21:52, Giovani Gracioli wrote:
> Thanks Jan.
>
> It is working now. the irqchip in the non-root cell was missing.
Good to hear!
>
> I added the following to the non-root cell:
>
> struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[1];
> ...
> .vpci_irq_base = 140-32
> ...
>
> .irqchips = {
>
Branch: refs/heads/coverity_scan
Home: https://github.com/siemens/jailhouse
Commit: 152738bbb72c9f584fe6bc9d618ba72f3354ae84
https://github.com/siemens/jailhouse/commit/152738bbb72c9f584fe6bc9d618ba72f3354ae84
Author: f...@ozog.com
Date: 2018-04-12 (Thu, 12 Apr
I realized that I had forgot .num_irqchips = ARRAY_SIZE(config.irqchips) in the
non-root cell config.
After adding it to the non-root cell config and created the cell, I got the
following:
irqchip_set_pending(), local_injection = 0, sender (current cpu) = 3
irqchip_set_pending()->
I realized that I had forgot .num_irqchips = ARRAY_SIZE(config.irqchips) in the
non-root cell config.
After adding it to the non-root cell config and created the cell, I got the
following:
irqchip_set_pending(), local_injection = 0, sender (current cpu) = 3
irqchip_set_pending()->
I realized that I had forgot .num_irqchips = ARRAY_SIZE(config.irqchips) in the
non-root cell config.
When I added it to the cell config and created the cell, I got the following:
jailhouse cell create zynqmp-zcu102-gic-demo-i
irqchip_set_pending(), local_injection = 0, sender (current cpu) = 3
Thanks Jan.
So what I should do is to have a different IRQ for the root and non-root cells?
The root cell config has the following:
...
.vpci_irq_base = 136-32
...
.irqchips = {
/* GIC */ {
.address = 0xf901,
.pin_base = 32,
El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018, 8:38:43 (UTC+2), J. Kiszka escribió:
> > El lunes, 16 de abril de 2018, 14:45:45 (UTC+2), J. Kiszka escribió:
> >> On 2018-04-16 14:21, iallende wrote:
> >>> El viernes, 13 de abril de 2018, 9:14:46 (UTC+2), J. Kiszka escribió:
> On 2018-04-12 15:15,
On 2018-04-17 15:51, allende.ima...@gmail.com wrote:
> El lunes, 16 de abril de 2018, 14:45:45 (UTC+2), J. Kiszka escribió:
>> On 2018-04-16 14:21, iallende wrote:
>>> El viernes, 13 de abril de 2018, 9:14:46 (UTC+2), J. Kiszka escribió:
On 2018-04-12 15:15, iallende wrote:
> It still
On 2018-04-17 15:42, a.ku...@matellio.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 5:15:45 PM UTC+5:30, J. Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2018-04-17 12:10, a.ku...@matellio.com wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to bring virtual network interface for intercell
>>> communication, normally in other
On 2018-04-17 15:17, Giovani Gracioli wrote:
> It is not completely the same configurations, one is the root-cell and
> another one is a bare-metal cell based on the gic-demo. I attached both here.
>
> I believe the Linux program is correct, because I can see the number of
> interrupts
10 matches
Mail list logo