Wolf Siberski wrote:
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-27 17:15
---
Wolf's revisions to my changes to Query.combine() look fine. The
single-query
optimization is good -- my oversight to have not included it
originally. I
don't believe either of the other two
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Here is the first and most high-priority patch I've settled on to get
Lucene to work efficiently for the typical usage scenarios of
MemoryIndex. More patches are forthcoming if this one is received
favourably...
There's large overhead involved in forcing all IndexReader impls to
have a
Doug Cutting writes (4/28/2005 2:19 PM):
Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet
tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I
thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later.
Would folks find this useful?
Yes, very useful,
Doug Cutting wrote:
Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet
tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I
thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later.
Would folks find this useful?
This looks very useful. It gives an easy way
I like this! I also think this should be in the core. This would
allow one to partition an index and spread it over multiple disks, for
instance.
I like the name ParallelReader, but I wonder if people will confuse it
with Aha, an IndexReader that reads multiple indices in parallel
(using
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34673.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34673.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
