Re: Shared Field Values

2005-11-12 Thread Charles Lloyd
On Saturday, November 12, 2005, at 05:37PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >if the fields you are talking >about "sharing" are allways indexed, then you can leave them UnStored, and >use a FieldCache.StringIndex to get the values. This is a great suggestion except that the terms store

Highlighter using spans

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
Mark et al, I'm delving into highlighting text (per-field, like the recent topic on java-user) and need it to highlight the exact spots used in the query, not just all query terms as the current Highlighter does. And I need it to be SpanQuery savvy. Further, it seems the Spans capabilit

Re: Shared Field Values

2005-11-12 Thread Chris Hostetter
The first thing that occurs to me, is that if the fields you are talking about "sharing" are allways indexed, then you can leave them UnStored, and use a FieldCache.StringIndex to get the values. -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Implementation in C & Some Questions

2005-11-12 Thread Robert Kirchgessner
Hi Dave, I've looked at your Ferret project. Great work! I've browsed somewhat through the C-code, looks quite familiar to me. What were the problems you've mentioned in your mail? I may not have noticed them, perhaps it could help us make the code better if we shared ideas. If you're interested

Shared Field Values

2005-11-12 Thread Charles Lloyd
Would the following be a reasonable feature to add to Lucene? We use Lucene for a catalog with about 3 million items, each document represents one item. Some Fields are highly redundant, such as "Manufacturer Name"; we only have a few hundred different manufacturers. I would like to be able d

Re: Contrib in oblivion

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On 12 Nov 2005, at 06:15, Paul Elschot wrote: I upgraded ant and building from contrib/surround/build.xml works here. However ant build-contrib using the lucene build.xml currently fails at compiling the lucene test code. Help me out here... the error message please :) At revision 33275

Re: svn commit: r332747 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/regex/ src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/regex/

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On 12 Nov 2005, at 05:43, Daniel Naber wrote: On Samstag 12 November 2005 10:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +23. Added regular expression queries, RegexQuery and SpanRegexQuery. +Note the same term enumeration caveats apply with these queries as +apply to WildcardQuery and other ter

Lucene 1.2 Score formula

2005-11-12 Thread Karl Koch
Hello experts, sorry for cross posting but this is really important for me. For documentation purposes I need to know the exact scoring formula that is used by the Lucene 1.2 release. I have found a scoring formula in the Lucene book but this is likely oriented on the 1.4 release and might have ch

Re: Contrib in oblivion

2005-11-12 Thread Paul Elschot
On Saturday 12 November 2005 10:55, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2005, at 04:41, Paul Elschot wrote: > >> Could you try using Ant 1.6.5? I just built contrib/surround > >> > > > > The joy of developing at the cutting edge... > > Was the upgrade of Ant what fixed it? I also reverted all bu

Re: svn commit: r332747 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/regex/ src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/regex/

2005-11-12 Thread Daniel Naber
On Samstag 12 November 2005 10:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +23. Added regular expression queries, RegexQuery and SpanRegexQuery. > +    Note the same term enumeration caveats apply with these queries as > +    apply to WildcardQuery and other term expanding queries. Maybe you should add that t

Re: Contrib in oblivion

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On 12 Nov 2005, at 04:41, Paul Elschot wrote: Could you try using Ant 1.6.5? I just built contrib/surround The joy of developing at the cutting edge... Was the upgrade of Ant what fixed it? I upgraded ant and building from contrib/surround/build.xml works here. However ant build-cont

Re: Contrib in oblivion

2005-11-12 Thread Paul Elschot
On Saturday 12 November 2005 02:12, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On 11 Nov 2005, at 17:26, Paul Elschot wrote: > >> Paul - what version of Ant are you using? I'm (always) swamped, but > >> I'll put this on my list of things to look at as soon as possible if > >> no one else beats me to it. > >> > > >

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-461) StandardTokenizer splitting all of Korean words into separate characters

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-461?page=all ] Erik Hatcher closed LUCENE-461: --- > StandardTokenizer splitting all of Korean words into separate characters > > >

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-461) StandardTokenizer splitting all of Korean words into separate characters

2005-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-461?page=all ] Erik Hatcher resolved LUCENE-461: - Fix Version: 1.9 Resolution: Fixed These patches have been applied, thanks! There is one thing to note, and that is a change in the token type emi