Re: Is it safe to remove the throw from FastCharStream.refill() ?

2006-10-05 Thread Doron Cohen
Right... I was thinking about issue 388, which handled a CPU issue in IndexWriter.maybeMergeSegments(), and certainly not the FastCharStream IOException issue (that was discussed there). Thanks Paul for catching this, Doron Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/10/2006 22:40:14: On

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues

2006-10-05 Thread Marco Dissel (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329?page=comments#action_12440168 ] Marco Dissel commented on LUCENE-329: - Why isn't the patch implemented? My users are finding the current result of fuzzy searched not correct (as stated in

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues

2006-10-05 Thread Marco Dissel (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329?page=comments#action_12440168 ] Marco Dissel commented on LUCENE-329: - Why isn't the patch implemented? My users are finding the current result of fuzzy searched not correct (as stated in

Promoting PrefixFilter to the Lucene core

2006-10-05 Thread Andi Vajda
Hi all, About ten days ago, I filed bug 676: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676 requesting that we promote Solr's PrefixFilter to the Java Lucene core. Several people responded in favor:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues

2006-10-05 Thread Marco Dissel (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329?page=comments#action_12440219 ] Marco Dissel commented on LUCENE-329: - but assuming clean data with no mis-spellings, scoring rare terms higher seems like the ideal behavior Exact matched

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues

2006-10-05 Thread Marco Dissel (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329?page=comments#action_12440219 ] Marco Dissel commented on LUCENE-329: - but assuming clean data with no mis-spellings, scoring rare terms higher seems like the ideal behavior Exact matched

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-329) Fuzzy query scoring issues

2006-10-05 Thread Chris Hostetter
: but assuming clean data with no mis-spellings, scoring rare terms : higher seems like the ideal behavior : : Exact matched of a term should have a higher ranking then fuzzy matched : terms.. at least that's the expected behaviour in my situation although : i think it seems the most common

Changes at Field.Text()

2006-10-05 Thread Jan Pieper
I am new to Java and Lucene and I bought a book about Java Lucene and there is an example which does not function because Field.Text(String, String) is deprecated now. What I have to do now? Here is the code:

RE: Changes at Field.Text()

2006-10-05 Thread Steven Parkes
Field( String, String, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED ) is the equivalent of the old Field.Text( String, String ) which was deprecated in 1.9 and removed in 2.0. This is really a java-user question. -Original Message- From: Jan Pieper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-676) Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core

2006-10-05 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676?page=all ] Yonik Seeley closed LUCENE-676. --- Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Yonik Seeley The test was incorrect. I fixed it, added some more tests, and committed.

Re: Changes at Field.Text()

2006-10-05 Thread Jan Pieper
Oh, I didn´t know if it is a -dev or -user question. So i decided for the wrong one. Sorry. -- Jan Field( String, String, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED ) is the equivalent of the old Field.Text( String, String ) which was deprecated in 1.9 and removed in 2.0. This is really a