[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473316
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-804:
This can be easily fixed like this:
Index: build.xml
==
: Please vote to officially release these packages as Lucene 2.1.
+0
the inability to build several contribs in the source release because the
jars they depend on are excluded (and there's no docs on what they are for
people to download them manually) seems pretty bad ... but i don't know
that i
>
> : Please vote to officially release these packages as Lucene 2.1.
>
> +0
>
> the inability to build several contribs in the source release because the
> jars they depend on are excluded (and there's no docs on what they are
for
> people to download them manually) seems pretty bad ...
I think t
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > I'm not exactly sure if this is show stopper, but when I get the
: > binary, the build.xml that is included is not usable b/c it is
: > missing common-build.xml.
: Oops... I think we should fix this for the release if at all
: possible.
I've been reading this thread and here is my take as I will be
updating jpackage for a 2.1 release.
The content of a binary distribution differs widely as to what is
included in it. It obviously needs to have one or more jar files that
represent the product. Beyond that I have never really
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > I'm not exactly sure if this is show stopper, but when I get the
: > binary, the build.xml that is included is not usable b/c it is
: > missing common-build.xml.
: Oops... I think we
On Feb 15, 2007, at 8:10 AM, DM Smith wrote:
I don't think that one should ever expect to build from a binary
package. Even if one could.
Here's the hitch... the demo code that comes with Lucene, as sad as
it is :(, gets shipped as source code in the binary distribution.
This makes sense
New Lucene Demo
---
Key: LUCENE-805
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Examples
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Assigned To: G
On 2/15/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's weird, is I don't think much has changed build wise from the
last release, yet we all of a sudden noticed all these things.
Yes, I just verified that things are pretty much in the same shape in
the 2.0.0 release.
contrib/(ant, lucli,
I vote for release of 2.1 as-is... no one really uses that demo stuff
anyway. I'll tackle the binary custom demo build.xml file as soon as
I can and commit that. When folks complain, we can point them to the
new build.xml file and they'll just plop that into a 2.1 binary
release and it'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473419
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-805:
-
The examples from Lucene in Action are freely available and Otis and I are
Recap:
- some contrib modules can't be built without the user downloading
more jars themselves
- the "demo" in the binary package currently needs to be built by the
user, and needs a special build.xml that doesn't rely on lucene source
code (oops). I just verified that this was also broken in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-804:
---
Attachment: 804.build.xml.patch
804.build.xml.patch removes loadable jars from the src_dist
and adds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-804:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
> build.xml: result of "dist-src" should support
+1. Out the door is good, esp. since there haven't been complaints
about it in the past.
Thanks for doing this Yonik!
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Recap:
- some contrib modules can't be built without the user downloading
more jars themselves
- the "demo" in the binary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473429
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-805:
I'm all for that the examples from LIA, but I also think the key par
15 feb 2007 kl. 17.42 skrev Yonik Seeley:
Recap:
- some contrib modules can't be built without the user downloading
more jars themselves
I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would solve /
at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my other
projects. :) I'd
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-626
Did anyone try out or took a look at my redesign of the spell
checker? I'd love some feedback.
--
karl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to make Doron
Cohen a Lucene committer.
Congrats, and welcome aboard, Doron!
-Yonik
ps: Doron - you can test out your new privileges by updating the
who-we-are page, and regenerating + updating the site. And it would
be nice to introduce yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473480
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-805:
-
That was my concern as well, Grant. At least the LIA code is fairly well
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would
solve /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my
other projects. :) I'd be happy to help out , but there are some
wicked anting going on in a lot of build.xml:s s
I think that code is great and is often self-documenting, but it only
represents the result of someone writing the code, it doesn't explain
the why part of it. So, it would need English (and translations???)
to explain why a particular approach was taken, along with possible
alternatives.
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would
solve /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my
other projects. :) I'd be happy to help out , but there are some
wicke
I looked at it briefly and said to myself:
"Wow, cool! I'll have to check that out some day." :-)
Just a friendly reminder that lack of comments != lack of interest.
Perhaps a little more description of how things work, esp the adaptive
part, might elicit some feedback (and if it's in the maili
There are cultural issues as well as technical issues to adopting Maven.
Most folks involved with Lucene are familiar with using Ant and
maintaining an Ant-based build system. So merely converting Lucene to
be built by Maven will not cause everyone who currently works on Lucene
to become will
My first impression of ant:
Ok, the syntax is a little funky, and I can't re-use my knowledge of command
line options to tools w/o doing an exec... I need to learn the "ant" parameters
for all the different tasks now. I can look at a build.xml and tweak/fix it
because there isn't too much "magi
Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to make Doron
Cohen a Lucene committer.
Congrats, and welcome aboard, Doron!
-Yonik
Awesome news, Doron! Welcome aboard.
Congratulations,
Michael
-
15 feb 2007 kl. 21.24 skrev Yonik Seeley:
But, it all seems like magic to me... if I want to do something
different,
even a minor little change, I don't know where to start. If I want
to add an
additional compile flag, where does that go??? I have no idea. To
change the
behavior (like u
On 2/14/07, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473274
This probably goes for IntelliJ too
*.iml
*.iws
*.ipr
> add svn ignores for eclipse artifac
I think a POM for Lucene core and demo is pretty trivial, since there
are no dependencies, although I haven't tried Maven 2 yet. Contrib
modules w/ dependencies is a little bit harder and getting them all
to work together is a bit more on top of that.
We made the switch to Maven 1 at CNLP
Congrats, Doron! Glad to have you on board!
Your benchmark contribution is really useful as are the many
contributions to discussions, etc. Look forward to working with you
in the future!
-Grant
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PM
Thanks everyone!
I am very happy to become part of this team!
Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/02/2007 13:42:58:
> Congrats, Doron! Glad to have you on board!
>
> Your benchmark contribution is really useful as are the many
> contributions to discussions, etc. Look forward to wo
karl wettin wrote:
>
> 15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
>> On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
>>> I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would solve
>>> /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my other
>>> projects. :) I'd be happy to help
15 feb 2007 kl. 23.03 skrev Steven Rowe:
I'll see what I can do this weekend.
"Maven" refers to two very different products. Which version to use
ought to be a serious consideration.
Karl, do you mean to use Maven 1.X or Maven2?
Maven2. mvn.
--
karl
-
Here is a couple of alternative points of view on Maven. Make
sure your kids are not reading this:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=why_maven_sucks
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=maven_refresher_course
- Original Message -
From: "karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
S
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.52 skrev Yonik Seeley:
I looked at it briefly and said to myself:
"Wow, cool! I'll have to check that out some day." :-)
Just a friendly reminder that lack of comments != lack of interest.
At least I don't have to call my mom for confirmation now. :)
Perhaps a little mo
These articles are over 3 years old or more, I think the large
community that uses Maven says it is a worthwhile thing. I'm
curious, Slava, how many of ViewTier's Parabuild clients use Maven,
since your website says you support it?
I'm not saying Maven is the be all end all, but it works p
Parabuild is build-tool agnostic, nor Viewtier has any tool preferences.
The open source projects that we are currently supporting at
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080
vary in use of builds tools. Our experience with setting up that projects has
shown that
Ant-based ones have been somewhat ea
16 feb 2007 kl. 00.37 skrev Slava Imeshev:
My personal opinion is that Ant is good enough and that Java has
reached build automation
nirvana with it, just like C/C++ with make.
Did I start yet another tech-religous war thread now? Sorry about that.
However, I don't think that the Buddha de
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:58:00 -0500, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
16 feb 2007 kl. 00.37 skrev Slava Imeshev:
My personal opinion is that Ant is good enough and that Java has
reached build automation
nirvana with it, just like C/C++ with make.
Did I start yet another tech-religo
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I think that code is great and is often self-documenting, but it
only represents the result of someone writing the code, it doesn't
explain the why part of it. So, it would need English (and
translations???) to explain why a particular ap
karl wettin wrote:
However, I don't think that the Buddha defined Nivana as "good enough".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana, "It is a mode of being that is
free from mind-contaminants (Kilesa) such as lust, anger or craving."
That's not far from "good enough".
Doug
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-794:
---
Attachment: HighlighterTest.java
QuerySpansExtractor.java
Highlighter.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473578
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794:
Using an Analyzer that produces multiple tokens at the same position does no
Welcome Doron!
Otis
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:49:54 AM
Subject: Welcome Doron Cohen!
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to make Doron
Cohen a Lucene committer.
Congrats,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-645:
--
This fix works well for our case with JapaneseAnalyzer.
input text: "AAA BBB CCC (DDD EEE)"
outpu
46 matches
Mail list logo
