is it just me, or does it seem like the base class versions of
getVersion(), isOptimized(), and isCurrent() in IndexReader should all
throw UnsupportedOperationException?
(it seems like ideally they should abstract, but that ship/API has sailed)
: This patch fixes ParallelReader similar to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966:
-
Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt
A patch for better compatibility
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516945
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-967:
---
Also, I think the addition of printing of elapsed time is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-967:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-967.take3.patch
Add tokenize documents only task to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516996
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-971:
---
This looks great!
One alternate approach here would be to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516997
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-971:
--
I can look at what it would take to avoid the line file ... but ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517003
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-966:
---
Oddly, the patch for TestStandardAnalyzer failed to apply for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517007
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-971:
---
I can look at what it would take to avoid the line file ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517031
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-967:
Thanks for fixing this Michael, looks perfect to me now.
Add tokenize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517035
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-967:
---
Thank you for reviewing! I will commit shortly.
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517048
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-971:
Mmm... an additional advantage of this is not needing to extract
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517047
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-971:
But, this is the case regardless of which approach we use (ie, both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-743:
-
Attachment: lucene-743.patch
Now, after LUCENE-781, LUCENE-970 and LUCENE-832 are committed, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517087
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-743:
--
I ran some quick performance tests with this patch:
1) The test opens
16 matches
Mail list logo
