Token of "" returns in CJK
---
Key: LUCENE-973
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Analysis
Affects Versions: 2.3
Reporte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Toru Matsuzawa updated LUCENE-973:
--
Attachment: CJKTokenizer20070807.patch
patch attached.
> Token of "" returns in CJK
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518162
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
This looks great Steve!
More specific feeedback soon, but ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518165
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-847:
--
I
think we ideally would like concurrency to be fully in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518184
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
Some more feedback:
- Is the separate IndexMerger interfac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518186
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
> > I think we ideally would like concurrency to be fully inde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518210
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-847:
--
Is the separate IndexMerger interface really necessary?
I wrestled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518222
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-847:
--
On a related note, Mike, there a few FIXME's in IW related to useCompoun
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/179/changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the plan towards 3.0 release laid out, I think it's a good time
to deprecate IndexModifier and eventually remove IndexModifier.
The only method in IndexModifier which is not implemented in
IndexWriter is "deleteDocument(int doc)". This is because of the
concern that document ids are changing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518237
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
> Looking at IW, with the new DocsWriter stuff, it looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518251
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-847:
--
Ah. I understand better now. I have to admit, I haven't kept up to date
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518263
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847:
---
> I'm thinking maybe a MergePolicy#useCompoundDocStore( Segmen
Remove Author tags from code
Key: LUCENE-974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-974
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Assignee: Grant Ingerso
DISCLAIMER: Just to be clear, what follows is my personal opinion and
in no way, shape or form reflects an official position from the
Lucene project:
So, now that we have all this great stuff for running TREC
experiments in contrib/benchmark, I am wondering if people think it
would be use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-550:
--
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll (was: Karl Wettin)
> InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory c
+1
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Ning Li wrote:
With the plan towards 3.0 release laid out, I think it's a good time
to deprecate IndexModifier and eventually remove IndexModifier.
The only method in IndexModifier which is not implemented in
IndexWriter is "deleteDocument(int doc)". This is bec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-974:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-974.patch
Remove all @author tags
> Remove Author tags from code
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518291
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-550:
Hey Karl,
I started to look at this, but there are a few stoppers a
Position based TermVectorMapper
---
Key: LUCENE-975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-975
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Store
Reporter: Grant Inge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-975:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-975.patch
First attempt at a position based TermVectorMapper. I believe i
Hi Peter,
Give https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-975 a try. It
provides a TermVectorMapper that loads by position.
Still not what ideally what you want, but I haven't had time to scope
that one out yet.,
-Grant
On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
Hi Grant,
No
22 matches
Mail list logo
