[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-724) Oracle JVM implementation for Lucene DataStore also a preliminary implementation for an Oracle Domain index using Lucene

2007-09-27 Thread Marcelo F. Ochoa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcelo F. Ochoa updated LUCENE-724: Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New]) Affects

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-724) Oracle JVM implementation for Lucene DataStore also a preliminary implementation for an Oracle Domain index using Lucene

2007-09-27 Thread Marcelo F. Ochoa (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcelo F. Ochoa updated LUCENE-724: Attachment: ojvm-09-27-07.tar.gz This new release includes: * Synchronized with latest

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-724) Oracle JVM implementation for Lucene DataStore also a preliminary implementation for an Oracle Domain index using Lucene

2007-09-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530709 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-724: Is the intent of this to be committed as a contrib module (I notice

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1006) QueryParser doesn't accept empty string

2007-09-27 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
QueryParser doesn't accept empty string --- Key: LUCENE-1006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1006 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Yonik Seeley foo:

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1006) QueryParser doesn't accept empty string

2007-09-27 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1006: - Attachment: queryparser.patch Attaching patch. Unless anyone sees a reason why should be

Does upgrading lucene jar means re index everything

2007-09-27 Thread proarki
We were currently using lucene 1.4.3 jar for the last 1 year and have index files with size 25gb. Now iam planning to upgrade to lucene 2.2 jar. Should i delete all the current indexes and create new index from scratch or is it enough to run updates to update existing index files when i have new

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1007) Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

2007-09-27 Thread Ning Li (JIRA)
Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers - Key: LUCENE-1007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Index

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1007) Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

2007-09-27 Thread Ning Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ning Li updated LUCENE-1007: Attachment: LUCENE-1007.patch Just got around to do the patch: - The patch includes changes to

Re: Does upgrading lucene jar means re index everything

2007-09-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Hmmm, going from 1.4.3 to 2.2, I guess I would recommend re- indexing. I suppose, in theory , you could go from 1.4.3 - 1.9 - 2.0 - 2.1 - 2.2 or whatever the appropriate combination of versions is there, but if you have the option of indexing fresh in 2.2 I guess I would do it. Also, see

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1007) Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

2007-09-27 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1007: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1007) Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

2007-09-27 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530858 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1007: Thanks Ning! I will have a look at the patch. One

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-550) InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2007-09-27 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530875 ] Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550: Oups, the patch is of course granted ASF licence. InstantiatedIndex -

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-550) InstantiatedIndex - faster but memory consuming index

2007-09-27 Thread Karl Wettin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-550: --- Attachment: LUCENE-550_20070928_no_core_changes.txt New in this patch: * Payloads added to

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1007) Flexibility to turn on/off any flush triggers

2007-09-27 Thread Ning Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ning Li updated LUCENE-1007: Attachment: LUCENE-1007.take2.patch Take2 counts buffered delete terms towards ram buffer used. A test