[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-743:
-
Attachment: lucene-743-take2.patch
I'm attaching a new version of the patch that has a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531700
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-935:
--
Does our build machine have local access to
Michael Busch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the following exception in TestConcurrentMergeScheduler:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestConcurrentMergeScheduler
[junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 17.765
sec
[junit] -
FieldCache should support longs
---
Key: LUCENE-1015
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1015
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Reporter: Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531780
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1015:
-
Of course, since FieldCache is an interface, we need to think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1015:
Description: Would be nice if FieldCache supported longs and doubles (was:
Would be nice
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1015:
Summary: FieldCache should support longs and doubles (was: FieldCache
should support
+1
-Grant
On Sep 30, 2007, at 4:47 PM, markharw00d wrote:
I've put together a new Filter and Junit test for eliminating
duplicates from search results.
The typical usage scenario is where multiple documents exist in the
index which share an untokenized field value (e.g. the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1007.
Resolution: Fixed
I just committed this. Thanks Ning and Doron!
Flexibility to
TermVectorAccessor, transparent vector space access
Key: LUCENE-1016
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1016:
Attachment: LUCENE-1016.txt
TermVectorAccessor, transparent vector space access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1016:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1016.txt)
TermVectorAccessor, transparent vector space access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1016:
Attachment: LUCENE-1016.txt
Oups, prior patch contained some other stuff too by misstake.
I've put together DTDs documenting the full XML query syntax and used
comments/examples that a DTDDoc ant task can turn into useful
hyperlinked HTML help documents.
Anyone know what the procedure/licensing implications are if I wanted to
add a build dependency on DTDDoc? It looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1016:
Attachment: LUCENE-1016-Tanimoto.txt
TanimotoDocumentSimilarity, depends on TermVectorAccessor,
Is it something you can model after GData and the DB stuff, whereby
it downloads the necessary dependencies as part of the build?
Otherwise, I would ask on legal-discuss
On Oct 2, 2007, at 6:18 PM, markharw00d wrote:
I've put together DTDs documenting the full XML query syntax and
used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531964
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1016:
-
I think a kD-tree will be the next step here. Does that fit in this
BoostingTermQuery performance
-
Key: LUCENE-1017
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1017
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Keegan updated LUCENE-1017:
-
Attachment: BoostingTermQuery.java
Suggested change to BoostingTermQuery to extend TermQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Keegan updated LUCENE-1017:
-
Attachment: termquery.patch
Changes to TermQuery and TermScorer for previous patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531972
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1016:
-
Java 1.5 - Java 1.4 :-(
Soon, very soon (in Lucene terms), we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531973
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1016:
-
Grant Ingersoll - 02/Oct/07 05:40 PM
Java 1.5 - Java 1.4
Soon, very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532006
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1016:
-
Also, don't pay too much attention at the quite ugly code in
23 matches
Mail list logo