. We could exec
the sync shell command when running on Unix, but I don't know whether
there's an equivalent command for Windows, and it wouldn't be Java...
pure java solution with Queue sound much better to me, but Windows users may
find this useful, there is a sync utility for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542397
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
{quote}
Perhaps for the short-term, but long-term it would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1014:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3)
Removing 2.3 fix version; I don't think this should
robert engels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might be misreading the results for the mac mini. If you compare
the mac mini with the sync pro, they are what is expected, the
unsync'd is roughly the same as the sync'd.
It might be that Apple configures the driver to not allow lazy writes
TermDocs.skipTo fails with an ArrayOutOfBoundsException from BitVector
--
Key: LUCENE-1054
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1054
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1054:
---
Attachment: TestSkipTo.java
I turned the attachment into a Lucene JUnit test
I'm putting together a Google Web Toolkit-based version of Luke:
http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/Luke.war
This is neat, Mark!
At first I thought: darn, how the heck is he accessing the filesystem from
JavaScript (GWT or otherwise)?! Then it became clear to me that it's actually
the
This is neat, Mark!
Thanks - GWT rocks.
Then it became clear to me that it's
actually the _remote_ filesystem one is looking at (the server's).
Yes, that's a potentially worrying security issue that needs locking down
carefully. I think one mode of operation should be that Luke Server is
: Seems like a fine place to put it for now. But it really deserves a better
: home than that. What about a new client/luke directory? (following on
: Solr's structure).
i'd vote to stick with contrib ... it's just easier on the build system.
: 3) What needs to change in the build process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542537
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1051:
--
The take2 patch works fine for me. Also this works fine:
ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542536
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1051:
--
we should decide on how we're going to maintain gdata
Are many folks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542538
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1051:
--
the note about keeping the contrib list uptodate with the group list should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542543
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1051:
---
{quote}
The take2 patch works fine for me.
{quote}
Thanks for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542543
]
michaelbusch edited comment on LUCENE-1051 at 11/14/07 10:51 AM:
--
{quote}
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542542
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1051:
---
{quote}
Are many folks using Lucene's gdata server? If no one is
IndexReader.flush()
---
Key: LUCENE-1056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1056
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Michael Busch
Priority: Minor
With the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1056:
--
Component/s: Index
IndexReader.flush()
---
Key:
Remove GData from trunk
Key: LUCENE-1055
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1055
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/*
Reporter: Michael Busch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1051.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542561
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1055:
-
+1 I don't have the resources to maintain the gdata source code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542559
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1055:
--
+1, it will still be in SVN for reference if anyone needs it.
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Seems like a fine place to put it for now. But it really deserves
a better
: home than that. What about a new client/luke directory?
(following on
: Solr's structure).
i'd vote to stick with contrib ... it's just easier on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542574
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1055:
---
{quote}
I will write it up.
{quote}
Cool, thanks Grant.
Remove
Hi,
I was thinking about adding a news item on the Lucene website saying
that we're now publishing maven artifacts to the maven snapshot
repository and also that the artifacts now include sources and javadocs.
Everybody cool with that?
-Michael
I think we should get the whole timestamp part worked out first (i.e.
dropped from the name). And we should only store the last 10 nights.
I should be able to get to this next week after ApacheCon.
-Grant
On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking about adding
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I think we should get the whole timestamp part worked out first (i.e.
dropped from the name). And we should only store the last 10 nights. I
should be able to get to this next week after ApacheCon.
Well, I guess people can start playing with it even if we're going to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1055:
--
Attachment: lucene-1055.patch
This patch should remove everything that belongs to gdata.
27 matches
Mail list logo
