Hi Team,
I was thinking about building the release files and calling the vote on
Tuesday (19th). Tentative release date would then be the 22nd.
Does this sounds good or does anyone prefer to wait a bit longer?
-Michael
-
To uns
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569708#action_12569708
]
Thomas Peuss commented on LUCENE-1166:
--
bq. But I'm wondering if a similar approach c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569706#action_12569706
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-973:
---
The current CJKTokenizer returns a redundant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569698#action_12569698
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-954:
-
Normalization is only applied to the queryWeight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569681#action_12569681
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-973:
-
I don't fully understand the problem rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569656#action_12569656
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-954:
-
I don't see any harm in adding this, tho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic updated LUCENE-1003:
-
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Assignee: Otis Gospodnetic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12569654#action_12569654
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-998:
-
This one doesn't look like it's happenin
