Query independent means that the threshold should have the same relevance for
all queries and discard found docs below it. Current scoring implementation
doesn't give guaranties that, say two documents found in two queries and which
got the same score 0.5 are of the same quality.
I don't
Relevance ranking is an option but we still won't be able compare results. Lets
say we have distributed searching - in this case top 10 from one server is not
the same as those which are from another. Even worse we may get that in the
resulting set a document with most top score is worse than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219:
Attachment: LUCENE-1219.extended.patch
Mike,
This new patch includes take3 and adds the following:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620960#action_12620960
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1219:
Eks, could we instead add this to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12620970#action_12620970
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1350:
It seems like there are three
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1329:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1329.patch
I took a first cut at creating an explicit read only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621024#action_12621024
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1329:
--
bq. I didn't do this one yet ... it makes me
Following suggestion is weaker than the requested functionality, but
maybe you'll find the concept useful to ignore so called garbage results.
Assume that the query is a simple OR query made of a few words.
By examining the frequencies of these words in the index
(their DFs) devise a synthetic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621036#action_12621036
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219:
-
bq. could we instead add this to Field:
byte[]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621041#action_12621041
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1350:
-
Mike, thanks for clearing things...
You're
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621041#action_12621041
]
doronc edited comment on LUCENE-1350 at 8/8/08 1:18 PM:
-
Mike,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621043#action_12621043
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1219:
--
bq. Also ... it'd be nice to have a way to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DM Smith updated LUCENE-1350:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1350.patch
{quote}
Should we just absorb this issue into LUCENE-1333? DM, of your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DM Smith updated LUCENE-1333:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1333.patch
This patch includes all the previous ones.
Note: It includes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621091#action_12621091
]
Matthew Mastracci commented on LUCENE-753:
--
bq. Is the index itself corrupt, ie,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621099#action_12621099
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1219:
bq. realized I am missing actual
The only score that I can think of that can measure quality across
different queries are invariant scores such as pagerank. That is to score
the document on its general information value and then use that as a filter
regardless of the query. This is very different than the problem of trying
to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621101#action_12621101
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1333:
OK since you pulled it all
18 matches
Mail list logo