[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623593#action_12623593
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219:
-
bq. did you ever measure the before/after performance
Hi Mike,
one question (as I did not look into the svn or snapshots):
Is the new FieldCache implementation with optimized reopen() included in
this version or will this come with 3.0? At the moment, this is my biggest
performance problem with Lucene on sorted results when the index is reopened
Hi Uwe,
I think the patch is not ready to commit. If we want to release 2.4 very
soon, then the new FieldCache will not be part of it.
I haven't had time to work on it and I'll be on vacation for 2 weeks,
afterwards I should have some time to help working on it.
-Michael
Uwe Schindler
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the information!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Busch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:25 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1334:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Term improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1329:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1329:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Remove synchronization in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1052:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4)
Changing fix version from 2.4 to Unknown.
Add an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623627#action_12623627
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1334:
Patch looks good, thanks DM!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1334.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks DM!
Term improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1249:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Bugs in
OK we have 18 issues currently unresolved and marked as 2.4 fix version:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=12310110fixfor=12312681
I've got 4 of the issues; I should be able to resolve 3 of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1355:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.3)
2.4
Using the WeightedTerms option in the
What about the one or two not on the list marked 2.3.3? Should prob move
those forward for consideration as well.
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK we have 18 issues currently unresolved and marked as 2.4 fix version:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1249.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks David!
Bugs in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1341:
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Fix Version/s:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1329:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1329.patch
Attached new rev of this patch. I think it's ready
Yes, please. In fact we should mark them as both 2.3.3 and 2.4.
Mike
Mark Miller wrote:
What about the one or two not on the list marked 2.3.3? Should prob
move those forward for consideration as well.
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK we have 18 issues currently unresolved and marked as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1350:
Fix Version/s: 2.4
Filters which are consumers should not reset the payload or flags and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1356:
Fix Version/s: 2.4
Allow easy extensions of TopDocCollector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1355.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1001:
Attachment: LUCENE-1001.patch
Added to CHANGES.txt
Made the SpanQuery.getPayloadSpans()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623688#action_12623688
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1142:
-
Karl,
This is marked as 2.4, but your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1074:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1074.patch
gcc 4.3.1 is out since June 2008, so the workaround is no longer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1074:
-
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New])
Workaround in Searcher.java for gcj bug#15411
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623744#action_12623744
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1074 at 8/19/08 10:45 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1142:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4)
3.0
Updated Snowball package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin reassigned LUCENE-1142:
---
Assignee: Karl Wettin
Updated Snowball package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623775#action_12623775
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1335:
I plan to commit this in a day or
Hi Mike, that was clear from the beginning, I have asked u bit clumsy.
What I really wanted to ask, given it is not already possible: does this make
sense to provide it as a patch. It sound to me rather narrow to be useful for
wider community, but on the other side having efficient way to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1001:
Attachment: LUCENE-1001.patch
Took one last look through for final cleanup - removed an unused
I'm the one who originally lobbied for this patch to get the number of
patches required to compile Java Lucene (from .class files) with gcj down a
bit. I've since switched away from gcj, using jcc [1] instead which I wrote
for PyLucene originally.
That being said, if I were still using gcj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12623820#action_12623820
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1357:
-
Well this is annoying - the test for this
33 matches
Mail list logo
