[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1431.
Resolution: Invalid
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Avai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1437:
-
Attachment: fasterSkip.patch
Patch to SegmentTermEnum to override slow TermEnum.skipTo
> Faster
Faster skipTo on SegmentTermEnum
Key: LUCENE-1437
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1437
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 2.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644675#action_12644675
]
Andreas Kohn commented on LUCENE-1431:
--
We reworked the code around the problematic a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1424:
Attachment: LUCENE-1424.patch
Heres an early review patch.
I switched range and prefix to use mul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1420.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.3)
Committed revision 710117
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644773#action_12644773
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1435:
--
bq. So, it seems to me, either the user of this funct
: Currently, lucene query syntax supports range query like foo:[a TO b]. I
: didn't find a way to support one boundary range. (Or did I miss something?)
FWIW: the SolrQueryParser (which subclasses the Lucene QueryParser)
accomplishes this by treating '*' as special values.
users that want sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644756#action_12644756
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1424 at 11/3/08 10:44 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644780#action_12644780
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1435:
-
Robert Muir wrote:
bq. One alternative is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644782#action_12644782
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1435:
-
Hoss wrote:
{quote}
bq. So, it seems to me, ei
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644786#action_12644786
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-831:
This is missing a good way to manage the caching o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644802#action_12644802
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1424:
Patch looks good! Thanks Mark.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644805#action_12644805
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1424:
-
bq. I think we should indeed "factor up" into M
Do we want to deprecate all of the Prefix/Range/Wildcard Filter classes?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Miller wrote:
Do we want to deprecate all of the Prefix/Range/Wildcard Filter classes?
Actually, guess just Prefix is in there for now. Ill leave it and not
add the others.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
In favor of new QueryWrapperFilter(new XXXQuery(...))?
Actually you'd probably want to do this (should be faster than big
BooleanQuery, and, won't hit the clause limit):
MultiTermQuery q = new XXXQuery(...);
q.setUseConstantScorer(true);
Filter f = new QueryWrapperFilter(q);
It may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1424:
Attachment: LUCENE-1424.patch
bq In favor of new QueryWrapperFilter(new XXXQuery(...))?
I didn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644842#action_12644842
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1424:
Excellent!
Looks like PrefixGene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644848#action_12644848
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1424:
-
No worries, I'm still in the thick of it - plen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12644881#action_12644881
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1422:
---
Thanks for the thorough review, Mike! I mad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1424:
Attachment: LUCENE-1424.patch
A...satisfying bringing order to all of that. It kaleidoscopes u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1424:
Description: Cleans up a bunch of code duplication, closer to how things
should be - design wise,
23 matches
Mail list logo
