[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658740#action_12658740
]
David Bowen commented on LUCENE-1500:
-
That makes sense, thank-you Koji.
I think it m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658736#action_12658736
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Hmm...I'm going to have to break down and think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658735#action_12658735
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-1500:
I think the bug in Solr, not Lucene. Plea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Bowen updated LUCENE-1500:
Attachment: patch.txt
> Highlighter throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
> -
Highlighter throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
--
Key: LUCENE-1500
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: contri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658718#action_12658718
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Results with topN=10:
||numSeg||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1483:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch
OK new patch attached:
* Fixed the bug (I had adde
Michael McCandless wrote:
My feeling is if nobody steps up (has the "itch" & time) to work on
these big changes (which haven't really proceeded beyond
brainstormings on how we might fix them) soonish, we should not block
2.9 for them...
+1
Doug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658659#action_12658659
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Sorry, disregard those results ab
OK, so if we want to fix Fieldable/Field/AbstractField and
InputDoc/OutputDoc (and any other API-changers), we need to do
it for 2.9 not 3.0.
So then the question boils down to whether we should block 2.9 on
these big changes?
My feeling is if nobody steps up (has the "itch" & time) to work on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1483:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch
New patch attached:
* Made IndexWriter.getSegmentCo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1499.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4.1)
Lucene Fields: [New, P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch
LUCENE-1314.patch
- Added TestIndexReaderClone.testParall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1499:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFilter
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658531#action_12658531
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1465:
-
Hmmm...I think thats true, but thats for findin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658530#action_12658530
]
Jonathan Mamou commented on LUCENE-1465:
Mark, I would expect to get 0,0,3,6,7,7 a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1499:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1499.patch
> Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFilter
> -
Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFilter
Key: LUCENE-1499
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Sure
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> I think this makes sense. Can you submit patch? Thanks Shai.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Shai Erera wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> Is IndexFileNameFilter supposed to be a singleton (looks like it)?
>> If so, shouldn't its
I think this makes sense. Can you submit patch? Thanks Shai.
Mike
Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
Is IndexFileNameFilter supposed to be a singleton (looks like it)?
If so, shouldn't its constructor be private?
Also, since it has a static getFilter() method, its singleton should
also be private.
I c
20 matches
Mail list logo
