Hey Sami, I've been running tests quite a bit recently with Ubuntu 8.10
and OpenJDK 6 on a 64-bit machine, and I have not seen it once.
Just tried again with Sun JDK 6 and 5 32-bit as well, and I am still not
seeing it.
Odd.
- Mark
Sami Siren wrote:
I am constantly seeing following error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660808#action_12660808
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1511:
--
Perhaps this should have been brough
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660810#action_12660810
]
Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on LUCENE-1511:
Thanks for the mailing list
Ok, it's not a java 1.6 thing it's something else. I also found a box
that runs that test ok.
--
Sami Siren
Mark Miller wrote:
Hey Sami, I've been running tests quite a bit recently with Ubuntu
8.10 and OpenJDK 6 on a 64-bit machine, and I have not seen it once.
Just tried again with Sun JDK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660839#action_12660839
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1504:
--
In trunk, there is no more need to call
Michael M,
What program are you using on Mac OS X to format/word wrap your comments in
what looks to be about 40 characters?
-J
Improve Java packages (remove shared/split packages, refactore naming scheme)
-
Key: LUCENE-1511
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1511
Project: Lucene - Java
Ok, it's not a java 1.6 thing it's something else. I also found a
box that runs that test ok.
From what I can tell, this is the test that's failing:
http://www.krugle.org/kse/entfiles/lucene/apache.org/java/trunk/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestIndexInput.java#89
This is verifying that
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
No matter whether you are right or wrong, please keep a civil tone on
this public forum.
+1 Ad-hominem remarks are anti-community.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Robert Engels wrote:
Do what you like. You obviously will. This is the problem with the Lucene
managers - the problems are only the ones they see - same with the solutions.
If the solution (or questions) put them outside their comfort zone, they are
ignored or dismissed in a tone that is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660864#action_12660864
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1504:
---
Hi Patrick,
as the search contrib was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660864#action_12660864
]
thetaphi edited comment on LUCENE-1504 at 1/5/09 11:22 AM:
I use emacs.
Mike
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Michael M,
What program are you using on Mac OS X to format/word wrap your
comments in what looks to be about 40 characters?
-J
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Then your comments are misdirected.
On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Robert Engels wrote:
Do what you like. You obviously will. This is the problem with
the Lucene managers - the problems are only the ones they see -
same with the solutions. If the solution (or questions)
I am constantly seeing following error when running ant test:
[junit] Testcase:
testRead(org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexInput):FAILED
[junit] expected:[] but was:[??]
[junit] junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:[] but was:[??]
[junit] at
I think your on the right tack Ken. Don't know enough about Unicode
myself, but I was looking at this this morning, and what you say
somewhat jives with what I saw.
I don't think you can just flip that switch though - the index format
will not match what its trying to read (having been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
patrick o'leary updated LUCENE-1504:
Attachment: LUCENE-1504.patch
Changed filter calls from bits to getDocIdSet, the
+1 Agreed, the initial version should use RAMDirectory in order to keep
things simple and to benchmark against other MemoryIndex like index
representations.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
Michael McCandless wrote:
So then I think we should start with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660924#action_12660924
]
Michael Dodsworth commented on LUCENE-1227:
---
Any progress on getting this patch
In fact I think the 2 test cases of the modified UTF8 null bytes are
just bogus, because they are using Java's UTF8 charset decoder to
construct a String when (as Ken points out) the byte sequence 0xC0
0x80 is illegal UTF8.
I'll remove those 2 test cases.
Mike
Mark Miller wrote:
I think your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660947#action_12660947
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1504:
--
On dependencies between contrib modules, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1509.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 731747.
IndexCommit.getFileNames() should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch
LUCENE-1314.patch
Michael, thanks for reviewing the
23 matches
Mail list logo
