[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1518) Merge Query and Filter classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664432#action_12664432 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1518: -- Broadly, the patch moves the internal Constan

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1518) Merge Query and Filter classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664433#action_12664433 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1518: --- bq. That means that to add a Filter to a Bo

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1520: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1520.patch This is a patch for Mike's suggestion: It just fixes CheckIndex

Re: Lucene index updation and performance

Hi, Could you re-ask your question, on java-u...@lucene.apache.org? You'll get a better response there (this list, java-dev, is for discussing the development of the internals of Lucene). Mike mitu2009 wrote: I am working on a job portal site and have been using Lucene for job searc

Re: Maximum boost factor

Could you move this one to java-user as well? Thanks. Mike mitu2009 wrote: Does anyone know the maximum boost factor value for a field in Lucene? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-boost-factor-tp21492116p21492116.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Devel

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1520: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664472#action_12664472 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1520: Patch looks good; I'll commit sho

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1520: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1520.patch Again a slightly improved patch. byte[] is only allocated one ti

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1520. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.9 Committed revision 734967. Thanks Uwe

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1520: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1520.patch Again my last patch with optimized memory usage, now on the curr

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664480#action_12664480 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1520: OK, even better -- I'll commit.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1520) OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664481#action_12664481 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1520: Committed revision 734974. Thank

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664511#action_12664511 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314: {quote} Changed DirectoryIndexRea

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1521) "fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWriter.closeDocStore() when closing index with 500M documents

"fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWriter.closeDocStore() when closing index with 500M documents -- Key: LUCENE-1521 URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1521) "fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWriter.closeDocStore() when closing index with 500M documents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1521: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > "fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWr

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1521) "fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWriter.closeDocStore() when closing index with 500M documents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664544#action_12664544 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1521: Ugh, right. Plus another one (*

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1521) "fdx size mismatch" exception in StoredFieldsWriter.closeDocStore() when closing index with 500M documents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1521. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.9 Committed revision 735043. Thanks Sho

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314: - Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch {quote} "Changed DirectoryIndexReader. acquireWriteLock t

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1316) Avoidable synchronization bottleneck in MatchAlldocsQuery$MatchAllScorer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1316: - Attachment: LUCENE-1316.patch Patch includes AllTermDocs. > Avoidable synchronization

RE: Bubbling up newer records

Hi Ed, Here's an example, based on the code from (UNTESTED): public class LuceneFreshnessTest { public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { RAMDirectory directory = new RAMDirectory(); IndexWriter writer = new IndexW

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1476) BitVector implement DocIdSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664566#action_12664566 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476: -- {quote} it's fine to expose this API,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1316) Avoidable synchronization bottleneck in MatchAlldocsQuery$MatchAllScorer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664567#action_12664567 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1316: -- {quote} In a way, this is a mirror i

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664568#action_12664568 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314: bq. It's been added in this patch

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1518) Merge Query and Filter classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664569#action_12664569 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1518: -- The option is needed because the coordination

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1476) BitVector implement DocIdSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664570#action_12664570 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1476: bq. Why? The returned iterator ca

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1476) BitVector implement DocIdSet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664573#action_12664573 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476: -- {quote} If we moved to using only ite

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1476) BitVector implement DocIdSet, IndexReader returns DocIdSet deleted docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1476: - Description: Update BitVector to implement DocIdSet. Expose deleted docs DocIdSet from

RE: Bubbling up newer records

Thanks Steven...! Appreciate ur help! Regards Ed Steven A Rowe wrote: > > Hi Ed, > > Here's an example, based on the code from > (UNTESTED): > > public class LuceneFreshnessTest { > public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314: - Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch Added TestIndexReaderClone.testCloneNoChangesStilReadOnly,

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1483: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch OK new patch finally: * Fixed a few small things Yo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664661#action_12664661 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483: I decided to change the wiki inde

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664667#action_12664667 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483: - Nice Mike! Those results look great. Do we want

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664668#action_12664668 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314: Jason I think your last patch is

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664670#action_12664670 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483: bq. Do we want to keep the policy

RE: Bubbling up newer records

Am using Lucene.Net 2.0.4 version and am not able to see "Field.Index.ANALYZED" in the code. Thanks, Ed Steven A Rowe wrote: > > Hi Ed, > > Here's an example, based on the code from > (UNTESTED): > > public class LuceneFreshnessTest { > public

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314: - Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch Sorry, here it is. > IndexReader.clone >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1483: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch New patch w/ ComparatorPolicy removed. > Change Index

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1483) Change IndexSearcher multisegment searches to search each individual segment using a single HitCollector

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1483: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch Woops, last one had compilation errors in contrib/benc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664727#action_12664727 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314: I'm seeing this failure: {code} [

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1476) BitVector implement DocIdSet, IndexReader returns DocIdSet deleted docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664732#action_12664732 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476: -- Do we want to implement SegmentTermDo

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1314) IndexReader.clone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314: - Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch I was running "ant test-tag" which doesn't run all the tes

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #708

See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/708/changes Changes: [mikemccand] LUCENE-1521: fix 2 more cases of int overflow [mikemccand] LUCENE-1520: re-use single byte[] for all fields when testing norms [mikemccand] LUCENE-1520: prevent OOM in CheckIndex with large segment that