[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720524#action_12720524
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1693:
Doesn't this mean that we need to change all our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: TestCompatibility.java
I quickly hacked a tool demonstrating my concerns.
Running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720508#action_12720508
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
bq. is your patch backwards-compatible if a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720483#action_12720483
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1606:
--
Regarding the license - I think we al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720482#action_12720482
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1578:
--
Hi Karl,
Sorry, no, haven't had time
Alan,
Do you think something like FileDescriptor.setAdvise (mirroring
posix_fadvise) makes sense?
-J
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Lucene could really make use of this method. When a segment merge
> takes place, we can read & write ma
Sorry, not portable, but POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED is which can be used with
posix_fadvise.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we'd also like to request readahead be included in JDK7?
>
> http://linux.die.net/man/2/readahead
>
> On Tue, Jun
Perhaps we'd also like to request readahead be included in JDK7?
http://linux.die.net/man/2/readahead
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Hmm... posix_fadvise lets you do this with a file descriptor; this
> would be better for Lucene (per des
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720477#action_12720477
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
Thanks for the review Mike. Answers below. The co
You can "ant test -Dtestcase=TestSort", TestSort is an example.
You can also "ant test -Dtestpackage=search" - execute all *.search.* tests.
"ant test -Dtestpackageroot=search" would search *.search tests.
Is that what you were looking for?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jaso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720440#action_12720440
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I haven't review the patch yet, but I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Hallo Michael,
I played a little bit around. This patch impleme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720427#action_12720427
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1516:
--
In LogMergePolicy.findMergesToExpunge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720422#action_12720422
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1567:
---
OK that should be easy. We'll do that asap.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720417#action_12720417
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1567:
-
Commit is separate from IP Clearance an
Doesn't look like this is possible today, though could be handy?
> Mark Miller wrote:
> > Duck Uwe :)
> Clarification: Duck next time. As long as I have the time to do it
> (meaning, if it doesnt take as much time as it looks) , I will do it :)
What a hell! OK, next time...
-
To unsubscribe,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I've looked at the release todo wiki and I am still having nightmares.
Indeed - it's gotten 5 times longer since the last time I did Lucene or Solr.
There are parts that aren't strictly part of the release process IMO -
things like maven seem o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720404#action_12720404
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1567:
---
Ok GO!
> New flexible query parser
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720403#action_12720403
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1567:
--
Hi Michael,
I expect it takes one we
Mark Miller wrote:
Duck Uwe :)
Clarification: Duck next time. As long as I have the time to do it
(meaning, if it doesnt take as much time as it looks) , I will do it :)
- Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@
Michael Busch wrote:
Cool, seems like Mark is volunteering to be the 2.9 release manager ;)
I may look stupid, but I saw that one coming. I briefly considered
opening a 2.9 JIRA issue, assigned and titled "Make Lucene release
processes one click", but I thought maybe I better not bring attentio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720385#action_12720385
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1567:
---
But we still need to update the code before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720386#action_12720386
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1567:
-
OK, only outstanding items for clearanc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720382#action_12720382
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1567:
-
>From the IP Clearance, consider yourse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720379#action_12720379
]
Grant Ingersoll edited comment on LUCENE-1567 at 6/16/09 3:16 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720379#action_12720379
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1567:
-
I need an MD5/SHA1 hash
(http://incuba
Cool, seems like Mark is volunteering to be the 2.9 release manager ;)
I need to get the TokenStream API changes in and ideally LUCENE-1448.
How soon is soon? Code freeze in 2-3 weeks or so maybe? Then 7-10 days
testing, so 2.9 should be out mid July? Sounds reasonable?
Michael
On 6/16/09 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720372#action_12720372
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
thanks, i'll upload some more tests hopefully s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720371#action_12720371
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1567:
---
Adriano and Luis:
I think a few things nee
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Simon
Willnauer wrote:
> I was thinking of adding a patch for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1085
That's *way* too big of an issue and it breaks back compat in Solr (to
change from Solr's to Lucene's version - I know many people who have
implemented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1488:
Attachment: LUCENE-1488.txt
add analysis tests for a few languages to demonstrate what this does.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> My email client lost the original thread:
>
> So far, both Mike and I have voiced our desire to get a 2.9 release out the
> door soon. Java 1.5 awaits us on the other side :) No one else has really
> weighed in though. I've jumped in an started
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> So far, both Mike and I have voiced our desire to get a 2.9 release out the
> door soon.
+1
My silence was mainly because I wasn't sure I had too much time to do
anything on it myself (outside issues assigned to me of course).
-Yonik
http://w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-1505:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Remove NumberUtils from spatial contrib
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720359#action_12720359
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1505:
-
This issue depends on LUCENE_1496 which
My email client lost the original thread:
So far, both Mike and I have voiced our desire to get a 2.9 release out
the door soon. Java 1.5 awaits us on the other side :) No one else has
really weighed in though. I've jumped in an started to squeeze the 2.9
JIRA list with Mike anyway.
Is there
Do we have a proposed API in mind? Something like
FileDescriptor.setAdvise(enum flag); ?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Hmm... posix_fadvise lets you do this with a file descriptor; this
> would be better for Lucene (per descriptor not p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720353#action_12720353
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1699:
-
This group could develop hard for the rest of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720352#action_12720352
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1699:
--
Watch out - there's a new sheriff in town!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1699:
---
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
Another 2.9 huh? You own it then :)
> Field tokenStream should be us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1699:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1699.patch
incomplete patch for feedback - needs tests and further work to al
Field tokenStream should be usable with stored fields.
--
Key: LUCENE-1699
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720310#action_12720310
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
Michael, I only opened one issue: LUCENE-1488..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720305#action_12720305
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1377:
I agree we'd need a more comprehe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720300#action_12720300
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1581:
-
you *could* add the JDK collation key filter to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720298#action_12720298
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1581:
-
So it sounds like we may end up closing this wi
Michael McCandless wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, DM Smith wrote:
The Debian policy is to bump the major revision number every time there is an
incompatible API change.
Does this include adding methods to interfaces? Ie, is there some
automated check done by Debian that ro
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> The Debian policy is to bump the major revision number every time there is an
> incompatible API change.
Does this include adding methods to interfaces? Ie, is there some
automated check done by Debian that roughly matches our "JAR
drop-in-abi
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:41 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> I'll reiterate what this means to me. It is more than just file format
> stability. An index must still be useful. An index is invalidated if the
> analyzers, filters and/or token streams produce a different result. If these
> change, the index i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720296#action_12720296
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
ok, well i was stirring up trouble recommending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720291#action_12720291
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1607:
bq. I've held off because of a la
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720293#action_12720293
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
Also what happens if a user starts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720281#action_12720281
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
If the users move from the old Toke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720280#action_12720280
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
Patch looks good!
* There are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720279#action_12720279
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Also what happens if a user starts using th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720278#action_12720278
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
The problem goes further:
If the users mov
On 6/16/09 9:41 AM, DM Smith wrote:
Perhaps you should go back and see why the thread died.
OK I will read it.
I think we should do the following:
I'll send the mentioned mail to the user list and wait for feedback.
After a decent amount of time for feedback I will call a vote on
java-dev w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720276#action_12720276
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
The in 2.4 released CachingTokenFilter and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1607:
---
Assignee: Yonik Seeley
Or push to 3.1. I have no preference if it goes in as is, just lookin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720274#action_12720274
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1607:
--
I've held off because of a lack of consensus,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1688:
---
Assignee: Mark Miller
> Deprecating StopAnalyzer ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS - General replacement wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720266#action_12720266
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1607:
-
I assume we can assign this one to you Yonik?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720265#action_12720265
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1697:
-
I'm trying to get all of 2.9 assigned. If you d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1639:
---
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> intermittent failure in TestIndexWriter. testRandomIWReader
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720244#action_12720244
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1693:
-
Right, SinkTokenizer is only really cos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720247#action_12720247
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I wanted to add one additional advantage of
Mark Miller wrote:
I'm inclined to agree to a large extent. If we want to remove
deprecations more often, why not release major versions more often?
The main ramification I see being that the index back compat period
could be significantly shortened time wise with the current policy.
I don't t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720240#action_12720240
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1693:
Thanks Michael. Given that, I don't think my priv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720239#action_12720239
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
bq. Currently e.g. SinkTokenizer always ret
I'm inclined to agree to a large extent. If we want to remove
deprecations more often, why not release major versions more often?
The main ramification I see being that the index back compat period
could be significantly shortened time wise with the current policy.
DM Smith wrote:
Michael B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720237#action_12720237
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1693 at 6/16/09 9:57 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720237#action_12720237
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Grant: But with the new TokenStream API, yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720236#action_12720236
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
Perhaps I'm missing something, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720232#action_12720232
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. Could we make this even more generi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1650:
Attachment: LUCENE-1650.patch
> Small fix in CustomScoreQuery JavaDoc
> --
Michael Busch wrote:
Probably everyone is thinking right now "Oh no! Not again!". I admit I
didn't fully read the incredibly long recent thread about
backwards-compatibility, so maybe what I'm about to propose has been
proposed already. In that case my apologies in advance.
Perhaps you should go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720231#action_12720231
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1673:
-
bq. This is that baking in a specific i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720230#action_12720230
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1693:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't unders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-973.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Token of "" returns in CJKTokenizer + new TestCJKTokenizer
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720223#action_12720223
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-1673 at 6/16/09 9:30 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720227#action_12720227
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1693:
-
I think cloning is more prevalent than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720226#action_12720226
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-973:
---
OK I will commit shortly! Another o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720225#action_12720225
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-973:
michael, thanks.
> Token of "" returns in CJKTo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720224#action_12720224
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-973:
bq. Or... how about we just switch to iteration no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720223#action_12720223
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1673:
--
bq. But we are already "baking in" the trie i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720222#action_12720222
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1693:
bq. What do you or others think a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-973:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-973.patch
Or... how about we just switch to iteration not recursion?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720212#action_12720212
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-973:
Michael i don't see anything obvious, but a test c
Also, much shorter text to read :)
You're right, Michael's is 484 words, mine was 691. But in my defense, I did
offer two more changes, that were later brought up on this thread (summing
to 563 words) :).
Anyway, I'm glad it's kept alive and hopefully things will change.
Shai
On Tue, Jun 16, 20
Change backwards-compatibility policy
-
Key: LUCENE-1698
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Michael Busch
Assig
I would guess you hit what I call "thread fatigue" by the time you
summed that up :)
Michael hasn't been around for a bit - perhaps it was easier for him to
spawn a new thread.
Also, much shorter text to read :)
Shai Erera wrote:
Ahh ... I wish I had finished
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12720207#action_12720207
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-973:
---
Well, my question is: is there any i
Well I'd actually hope that there will be significantly less need to do
these "tricks" to get around the new policy.
I'll open a JIRA issue and we can use it to work on the exact wording.
Michael
On 6/16/09 9:03 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Right - I'm not saying that the users should trump the dev
Yeah, the only difference now is that we can remove deprecated APIs. And
I guess we add nothing.
Which is, as Micahel has said, is goofy.
3.0 will be 2.9 like 1.9 was 2.0. Without deprecations.
Not a big deal at all, but I find it goofy too.
- Mark
Michael Busch wrote:
From a backwards-comp
Ahh ... I wish I had finished
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Lucene%27s-default-settings---back-compatibility-p23792927.htmlwith
+1 of my own. Guess that's what was missing to get it to closure :).
Shai
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I'd suggest to treat a runtime change
Except regarding file format compatibility, see 1.
On 6/16/09 9:04 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>From a backwards-compatibility point of view, nothing really.
Michael
On 6/16/09 8:59 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
So under this proposal, what's the difference between a major and minor release?
-Yonik
From a backwards-compatibility point of view, nothing really.
Michael
On 6/16/09 8:59 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
So under this proposal, what's the difference between a major and minor release?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
Right - I'm not saying that the users should trump the devs, just
curious what the response will be, if any.
I also think that when we update the back compat policy, there should be
wording that stresses where we should use our new powers carefully (eg
common API's and such).
And we should u
Index back-compat is guaranteed to hold within minor releases.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> So under this proposal, what's the difference between a major and minor
> release?
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Michael Bu
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
