Hi
I have indexed 8 fileds with different boost. Now i have given a
searchstring which consists of a words and phrases. Now i want to do AND
search of that searchString on four fields and show the result based on
boost. For me searchString should occur completely in one of the field and
then the b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: LUCENE-1692.txt
patch with the two one-line fixes:
1. fix offsets for thai analyzer so
Runtime change. Hard to imagine people relying on failing document() call.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 00:29, Shai Erera wrote:
> I've made the changes to SegmentMerger and want to make the following
> changes to IndexReader.document(): (1) don't call ensureOpen() and (2) don't
> check isDeleted.
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721588#action_12721588
]
Koji Sekiguchi edited comment on LUCENE-1466 at 6/18/09 7:04 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1466:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1466.patch
updated patch attached.
- sync trunk (smart chinese analyzer(L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721586#action_12721586
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1539:
--
I think it would be convenient to all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch
* TestThreadedOptimize passes, LogMergePolicy now filters
Hmm... So the list at the bottom of this page looks accurate?
http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/gnulib/posix_005ffadvise.html
If it is, then posix_fadvise works on Linux only?
Perhaps madvise will be better then (judging by the much smaller unsupported
list)? It seems to run on most platf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721512#action_12721512
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
later tonight i can workup a patch to address t
: We had some discussions about it, the easiest is, to set the bootclasspath
: in the task to an older rt.jar during compilation. Because this
: needs updates for e.g. Hudson (rt.jar missing) we said, that the one, who
: releases the final version should simply check this before on the
: compilat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: LUCENE-1692.txt
patch with new testcase demonstrating the chinese behavior.
> Contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721504#action_12721504
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
ok got it,
the IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP is being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: LUCENE-1692.txt
michael: here is an updated patch.
i removed that chinese test, there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: example.jpg
Having trouble figuring this one out
> Contrib analyzers need tests
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721475#action_12721475
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
probably, fixed it and testing with ant now. il
what would be the difference/benefit compared to standard lucene SpellChecker?
If I I am not wrong:
- Lucene SpellChecker uses standard lucene index as a storage for tokens
instead of QDBM... meaning full inverted index with arbitrary N-grams length,
with tf/idf/norms... not only HashMap
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721469#action_12721469
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1692:
Probably eclipse isn't running wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721463#action_12721463
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
michael, i guess junit from my eclipse != junit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721466#action_12721466
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
michael: yes the stems/words.txt
for stems.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721462#action_12721462
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1692:
Me too :) Robert can you cons up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721461#action_12721461
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
heh -
+1 on fixing them all. Including reclaim
I've made the changes to SegmentMerger and want to make the following
changes to IndexReader.document(): (1) don't call ensureOpen() and (2) don't
check isDeleted.
Question is - can I make these changes on the current impls, or do I need to
deprecate and come up w/ a new name? Here a new name is n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721460#action_12721460
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1692:
I'm seeing this test failure:
{co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721457#action_12721457
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
Michael, I think it would be nice to fix the Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721451#action_12721451
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1692:
bq. michael: I'm think I'm done h
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
>> I pretty much find any excuse to go and write stuff in Python
>
> There's Scala...
I've only read about it so far but it does look good.
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1595.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Thanks Shai, I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721427#action_12721427
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1646:
--
As a general rule, code catching an execption and thr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721426#action_12721426
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I only tested performance with the lucene b
> I pretty much find any excuse to go and write stuff in Python
There's Scala...
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> > Michael Busch wrote:
> >>
> >> Everyone who is unhappy with the relea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721418#action_12721418
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1692:
-
michael: I'm think I'm done here.
if you consi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1692:
Attachment: LUCENE-1692.txt
added tests for czech.
added additional tests for smartchineseanalyzer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721410#action_12721410
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1677:
--
{quote}
I did ask:
http://www.mail-archive.com/java-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1700:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1700.patch
Attached patch.
I added a test case showing it, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721326#action_12721326
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1673:
Latest patch looks good Uwe! We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721320#action_12721320
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1595:
bq. they won't end up coming after you, they will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721311#action_12721311
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1595:
-
bq. I added readContentSource.alg just for that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1630:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1630.patch
Implemented the latest comments, except for TopScorer
> Mating Collec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721285#action_12721285
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
bq. CustomScorer's nextDoc uses advance on its su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721281#action_12721281
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1693:
-
{quote}
By the way, I tested Solr's tok
This would make an awesome addition to Lucene!
This is similar to how Lucene's spellchecker identifies candidates, if
I understand it right.
Would you be able to port it to java?
Mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Varun Dhussa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote on this a long time ago, but haven't fol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721276#action_12721276
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
bq. Can you please next time giv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
Again an update: Unified the reuseable tokens in the TokenWrappe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1693.patch)
> AttributeSource/TokenStream API improvements
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721208#action_12721208
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
bq. I think CustomScoreQuery.scorer should actual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721204#action_12721204
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
bq. QyertWeight -> QueryWeight
I'll fix. Can you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721196#action_12721196
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
* I wonder if we should have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1700:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> LogMergePolicy.findMergesToExpungeDeletes need
Hi,
I wrote on this a long time ago, but haven't followed it up. I just
finished a C++ implementation of a spell check module in my software. I
borrowed the idea from Xapian. It is to use a trigram index to filter
results, and then use Edit Distance on the filtered set. Would such a
solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721158#action_12721158
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
By the way, I tested Solr's token streams a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1673:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1673.patch
Final patch version with updated javadocs. I will commit in a da
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721142#action_12721142
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
OK, we can merge our patches then! At the m
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Michael Busch wrote:
>>
>> Everyone who is unhappy with the release TODO's, go back in your mail
>> archive to the 2.2 release and check how many tedious little changes we made
>> to improve the release quality. And besides the maven stuff, ther
Could you re-ask this on java-user instead? Thanks!
(java-dev is for discussing how to make changes to Lucene; java-user
is for discussing usage of Lucene).
Mike
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:13 AM, mitu2009 wrote:
>
> I've a web application which uses Lucene for search functionality. Lucene
> sear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721135#action_12721135
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
{quote}
For backwards-compatiblility we sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12721116#action_12721116
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1696:
-
I will be around and fix / adjust it if
56 matches
Mail list logo
