Hi,
I can port the code to java. I do not know the Lucene file structures
etc. as of now. So if someone with experience on that to store trigrams
and index them is can work on that part, I can port the rest of the code.
Regards
Varun Dhussa
Product Architect
CE InfoSystems (P) Ltd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722159#action_12722159
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
{quote}
bq. CustomScorer's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1630:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1630.patch
Patch looks good! I attached a new version w/ some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722166#action_12722166
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1701:
{quote}
bq. Someday maybe I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722168#action_12722168
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1703:
bq. After I added a number of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722169#action_12722169
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1703:
bq. or .. deprecate all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722172#action_12722172
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1705:
This should be simple to
The javadocs state clearly it must be MapString,String. Plus, the
type checking is in fact enforced (you hit an exception if you violate
it), dynamically (like Python).
And then I was thinking with 1.5 (3.0 -- huh, neat how it's exactly
2X) we'd statically type it (change Map to
Site search powered by Lucene/Solr
--
Key: LUCENE-1706
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722190#action_12722190
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1687:
---
bq. True, but you know how we are about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1706:
Attachment: LUCENE-1706.patch
Patch attached.
Site search powered by Lucene/Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722193#action_12722193
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
Go for it. No need to deprecate EFC,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722196#action_12722196
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1687:
---
Removing ExtendedFieldCache complete would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1687:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler (was: Grant Ingersoll)
Remove ExtendedFieldCache by rolling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722197#action_12722197
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
The whole point of this issue is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722198#action_12722198
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1687:
---
It breaks backwards compatibility in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722197#action_12722197
]
Grant Ingersoll edited comment on LUCENE-1687 at 6/20/09 7:16 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722198#action_12722198
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1687 at 6/20/09 7:19 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722199#action_12722199
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
Uwe,
The ENTIRE point of this issue is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722201#action_12722201
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1687:
--
Uwe is right - EFC has been around since 2.3,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722202#action_12722202
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
Why?
So much for case-by-case back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722203#action_12722203
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
And Yonik, if you're argument is b/c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722204#action_12722204
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1687:
--
bq. And Yonik, if you're argument is b/c Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722206#action_12722206
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
OK
Remove ExtendedFieldCache by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1701:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1701.patch
Patch with all changes, including LUCENE-1687 (it is easier to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722217#action_12722217
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1687:
---
Patch available in LUCENE-1701!
I close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722218#action_12722218
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1701:
---
I know you will kill me, Yonik, and Mike
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1701:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1701-test-tag-special.patch
LUCENE-1701.patch
The last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722231#action_12722231
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1703:
bq. Though we have a migration challenge (if we
Hi
I noticed both IndexReader and IndexWriter call ensureOpen in almost every
method. How critical is this check? Why would someone call any of these when
the writer or reader are close?
If we add isOpen() to both, then I think we can remove this code from
IndexWriter/Reader, and tell folks to
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Shai Ereraser...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed both IndexReader and IndexWriter call ensureOpen in almost every
method. How critical is this check? Why would someone call any of these when
the writer or reader are close?
It's to catch user errors, calling methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1699:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1699.patch
Patch attached.
I've attempted to clean up some of the semantics
I was looking at how to parallelize the tests, seems like this ANT command
would work, is there an open issue to do this?
http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/parallel.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722271#action_12722271
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1701:
bq. there is a possibility to
We've touched on this before:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/69669
I'd love to see a clean solution here (the tests are embarrassingly
parallelizable, and we all have machines with good concurrency these
days)... I have a rather hacked up solution now, that uses
I agree we should only promise best-effort, not immediate detection on
close, so we shouldn't be checking volatile refCount.
Mike
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Yonik Seeleyyo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Shai Ereraser...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722274#action_12722274
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1703:
bq. If we change the default to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1466:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1466-back.patch
LUCENE-1466.patch
I think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722283#action_12722283
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-1466:
Oops. Thanks for the updated patch, Mike!
I was looking at the ant parallelize stuff too - I think that only the
very latest release has the built in parallelize tests functionality
though. Just came out a bit ago.
- Mark
Michael McCandless wrote:
We've touched on this before:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12722292#action_12722292
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1703:
I'm not against the default, just thought that
Don't use ensureOpen() excessively in IndexReader and IndexWriter
-
Key: LUCENE-1707
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1707
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
With the added analyzer for LUCENE-1629, it seems the jar file is now ~3.5MB.
Given the size, does it make sense to put it in its own jar file?
That way programs can easily exclude it if space is a concern.
thanks
ryan
-
To
43 matches
Mail list logo
