[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1853) SubPhraseQuery for matching and scoring sub phrase matches.

2009-08-30 Thread Preetam Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853: Remaining Estimate: (was: 336h) Original Estimate: (was: 336h) > SubPhraseQuery for m

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1853) SubPhraseQuery for matching and scoring sub phrase matches.

2009-08-30 Thread Preetam Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853: Description: The goal is to give more control via configuration when searching using user entered

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1853) PhraseQuery Scorer for scoring sub phrase matches

2009-08-30 Thread Preetam Rao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853: Attachment: LUCENE-1853.patch Remove the dependency on PhraseQuery. Create a new Query called "Su

Re: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net (was: RE: Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing)

2009-08-30 Thread Chris Hostetter
: My question is, I would prefer to track SVN commits to keep track of : changes, vs. what I'm doing now. This will allow us to stay weeks : behind a Java release vs. months or years as it is now. However, while : I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting all those : comm

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Marvin Humphrey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749363#action_12749363 ] Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1877: - > I can see how this is not ideal, but

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1874) Further updates to the site scoring page

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1874: Attachment: LUCENE-1874.patch removes the outdated and empty section > Further updates to the sit

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1878) remove deprecated classes from spatial

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1878: Attachment: LUCENE-1878.patch removes the deprecated classes - there were two public fields decla

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1878) remove deprecated classes from spatial

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
remove deprecated classes from spatial -- Key: LUCENE-1878 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1878 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Components: contrib/spatial R

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1873: Attachment: LUCENE-1873.patch first rough draft patch > Update site lucene-sandbox page > ---

Lucene release announcement

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
I started trying out a list of sample features in the RC release emails, but its really just a quick hack I pulled out. If anyone has any suggestions of what they would like to see incorporated into the final release feature list, let me know. Not the most import thing in the world I know, but as a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749336#action_12749336 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877: - bq. People who use Lucene over NFS already have

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749334#action_12749334 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877: - {quote}This interface follows the completely st

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Marvin Humphrey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749330#action_12749330 ] Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1877: - > Anyone remember why NativeFSLockFacto

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749328#action_12749328 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855: --- Uwe, I'm not home right now, will look toni

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1855: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1855.patch bq. It was. OK. I found it :-) - in the first version after che

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749324#action_12749324 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1877: --- Let's do it in the following way: - depreca

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749322#action_12749322 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1877: bq. Anyone remember why NativeFSL

Re: Deprecated class in spatial contrib

2009-08-30 Thread Michael McCandless
+1, we should remove them. Mike On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just wondering > why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or was > there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should

Re: Deprecated class in spatial contrib

2009-08-30 Thread DM Smith
+1 How obvious!! On Aug 30, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just wondering why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or was there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should just deprecate

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749312#action_12749312 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855: --- {quote} Michael: This was not in the commen

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749308#action_12749308 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1873: - Here is a rough draft - if you have any comment

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749307#action_12749307 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1855: - no worries here either guys - far from the copy

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749306#action_12749306 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855: --- bq. From the apache harmony project I hope

Deprecated class in spatial contrib

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just wondering why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or was there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should just deprecate whats been in a release, and change otherwise? -- - Mark http://www.lucid

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Michael Busch (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749305#action_12749305 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855: --- {quote} >From the apache harmony project I

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749303#action_12749303 ] Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1877 at 8/30/09 11:53 AM: -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749303#action_12749303 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877: - My initial thought was also that it didn't real

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749302#action_12749302 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1855: - bq. By the way, the generics for AttributeSourc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749301#action_12749301 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1877: --- For IndexWriter/IndexReader this hint is no

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1877) Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking -- Key: LUCENE-1877 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Javadocs R

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749294#action_12749294 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1855 at 8/30/09 10:49 AM: ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749294#action_12749294 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855: --- About the backwards compatibility: After ad

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749293#action_12749293 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1862: - Just as an expansion on my feelings about any c

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749292#action_12749292 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855: --- As I already started to move Lucene to Java

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1876) Some contrib packages are missing a package.html

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749291#action_12749291 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1876: - also db and remote > Some contrib packages are

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1876) Some contrib packages are missing a package.html

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Some contrib packages are missing a package.html Key: LUCENE-1876 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1876 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: co

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1875. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision: 809381 > Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusi

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1865) Add a ton of missing license headers throughout test/demo/contrib

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1865. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks for finishing this. > Add a ton of missing license headers throughout

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749285#action_12749285 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1862: - bq. I think we can change this even in release

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1875: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1875.patch Replaces {...@code ...} by javadoc 1.4 compatible . Will commit

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749283#action_12749283 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1862: --- +1 I was wondering why the analyzer is not

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-30 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749282#action_12749282 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1862: - Uwe, i think you are right, but the real proble

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
No, no, I wasn't arguing for a revert - more interested in exploring the topic :) If you think its cleaner, you did way more on the TokenStream API stuff than me and I think your javadoc pref on it should outweigh mine. - Mark Uwe Schindler wrote: > No problem, see my other mail! I can revert t

RE: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
No problem, see my other mail! I can revert the @link changes. By the way, I noticed shortly, that @code is Java 5 only. So I could replace it by . For me the whole class Javadocs were a little bit over-linkified with links pointing to the same class itself. I only wanted to remove links (as the g

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
I agree that its not necessary - and like I said in the other email - I'm not actually trying to get you to change it (much more important changes to argue for than javadoc), but I still disagree. I like those links ;) In my judgment, I never know what I want as a link ahead of time - I end up usin

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
To add to my argument (and I'm not trying to get you to change this patch by the way - its just javadoc, and I'm more interested in the argument than the results this morning ;) ) You could make a similar argument that links from one method referencing another in the same class are unneeded - you

RE: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
I cite the guide from Sun (http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/writingdoccomments/): -- Use in-line links economically You are encouraged to add links for API names (listed immediately above) using the {...@link} tag. It is not necessary to add lin

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1855) Change AttributeSource API to use generics

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1855: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1855.patch Here is the patch that implements generics for the Attributes AP

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Mark Miller
That depends - the links may end up in summaries on different pages (first sentence as an exaple) - it also provides a consistent formatting for class names so that they pop silmialry everywhere. I don't agree with "it makes no sense." I'd make every classname everywhere a link if I could.

Re: Parallel incremental indexing

2009-08-30 Thread Yonik Seeley
Cool stuff! We should also think about how to do single document field updates or field adds since that is the most common usecase - not that it needs to be implemented in the first version, but kept in mind so we don't box ourselves in. Doug mentioned some ideas he had in passing almost a year a

Re: Parallel incremental indexing

2009-08-30 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Michael Busch wrote: Hi all, I just added a wiki page for a new feature I'd like to add to Lucene. Please take a look at the link. I will add more details and diagrams to the page, but for now it should give a rough idea about how to implement it: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ParallelIncr

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-30 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749246#action_12749246 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: Good morning! > Improve javadocs

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1875: - Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing > -

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1875: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1875.patch Patxh with changed end() javadocs. This patch also removes the {

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1875) Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing -- Key: LUCENE-1875 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Analysis A

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749240#action_12749240 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- Oh I thought you were still sleeping... Goo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-30 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749239#action_12749239 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: The new changes look good -- than

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749238#action_12749238 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1862: --- How about putting the package.html files on

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-30 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1872: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1872-uwe.patch Hi Mike, I made some small improvements in formatting and al