[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1855:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1855_precedence_queryparser.patch
This patch updates the PQP to use t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761119#action_12761119
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
Thanks Adriano, I will open another issue a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1855.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Change AttributeSource API to use generics
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761125#action_12761125
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
Added CHANGES.txt and committed revision: 8
Convert PrecedenceQueryParser to new TokenStream API
Key: LUCENE-1932
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1932:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1932.patch
Attached the patch. When we remove deprecations, this must be ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761127#action_12761127
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1932:
---
By the way, this patch still contains some
Provide an convenience AttributeFactory that implements all default attributes
with Token
-
Key: LUCENE-1933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1933
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1933:
--
Component/s: Analysis
> Provide an convenience AttributeFactory that implements all default
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1932:
--
Component/s: contrib/*
> Convert PrecedenceQueryParser to new TokenStream API
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761127#action_12761127
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1932 at 10/1/09 1:17 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1933:
--
Description:
I found some places in contrib tests, where the Token.class was added using
addA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1933:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1933.patch
Patch.
> Provide an convenience AttributeFactory that implement
We are already using File.setLength to pre-set the length of the CFS
file, during merging, on the hope that it'll help the filesystem
minimize fragmentation of the file, but we don't use it when creating
the individual index files. We could pursue doing so for individual
index files too... I wasn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1857:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1857.patch
Patch that adds generics:
After thinking about it the whole nigh
Rework (Float)LatLng implementation and distance calculation
Key: LUCENE-1934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1934
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761171#action_12761171
]
Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-1934:
-
Forgot :
- Removed local imple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Helleringer updated LUCENE-1934:
Attachment: LUCENE-1934.patch
Initial release of path :
- Removed loop for % use
It's too bad there's no way to express a "this code fragment should
compile" inside a javadoc (I think?).
Had we {...@link ...}'d each method invocation we would have at least
seen javadoc warnings, but that's a real hassle.
Mike
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1924.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Thanks Yasuhiro & John!
> BalancedSeg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761193#action_12761193
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1934:
Note that there is something of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761198#action_12761198
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1930:
Note that there is something of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1928:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> PayloadTermQuery refers to a deprecated documen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1928.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Kay!
> PayloadTermQuery refers to a deprecated documenta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761202#action_12761202
]
Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-1930:
-
Would be pleased to =)
Chris ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1857:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1857.patch
Updated patch with tests generified and also using autoboxing in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761212#action_12761212
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1257:
---
This patch is bit outdated.
I will try to
Generify PriorityQueue
--
Key: LUCENE-1935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Other
Affects Versions: 2.9
Reporter: Uwe Sch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1257:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Port to Java5
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-
Uwe Schindler (JIRA) wrote:
> Convert PrecedenceQueryParser to new TokenStream API
>
>
> Key: LUCENE-1932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932
> Project: Lucene - Java
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1933.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 820658
> Provide an convenience AttributeFactory that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1935:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1935.patch
Patch for Priority Queue. The usage is not yet generified, but t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761229#action_12761229
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1935 at 10/1/09 7:39 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1936:
Component/s: contrib/analyzers
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Remove deprecated charset support fr
Remove deprecated charset support from Greek and Russian analyzers
--
Key: LUCENE-1936
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1936:
Attachment: LUCENE-1936.patch
> Remove deprecated charset support from Greek and Russian analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761239#action_12761239
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1936:
-
I'd like to commit this in a few days if there
I have a Lucene index that is very large in size.
It was created using a pre 2.1 version of Lucene.net 2.0.0.4.
The index is currently almost 20 GB, and has almost 7000 segment files.
The problem I am having is that I need to optimize it, and cant do this
without the search functionality of my
Would it work to copy your entire index to a new directory, perhaps on a
different machine and optimize *there*? Then copy back to your app. Of
course updates would be lost...
But taking a week to optimize a 20G index seems just plain wrong. Have you
tried playing with the various options to see if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761245#action_12761245
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1936:
---
Just commit it! The StringBuilder stuff is
2.0 is pre Mike's fabulous indexing updates - which just for one means
one thread doing the merging rather than multiple. I'm sure overall its
much slower.
But you can't take advantage of the newer faster code without updating
Lucene in your app.
Your best bet is to put it another machine and tak
The problem you have is that, if you optimize the index with a newer Luke
version, it refactors the index in a later lucene file format. To read it
with your current app, you also have to update your application to at least
the version of Lucene Luke uses.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Alle
lowfreq wrote:
I have a Lucene index that is very large in size.
It was created using a pre 2.1 version of Lucene.net 2.0.0.4.
The index is currently almost 20 GB, and has almost 7000 segment files.
The problem I am having is that I need to optimize it, and cant do this
without the search func
The place that it would help is where small writes are done and flushed.
If you do large writes or have good buffering (aka do large writes), then
preallocation probably won't help.
It helps ZK because they are writing a transaction log that must flush each
small write.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1932:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1932.patch
Hi Uwe,
I updated the patch, now it uses TermRangeQuery a
> 2.0 is pre Mike's fabulous indexing updates - which just for one means
> one thread doing the merging rather than multiple. I'm sure overall its
> much slower.
If you're doing a full optimize, you're still using a single thread. Am I wrong?
--
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.c
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> If you're doing a full optimize, you're still using a single thread. Am I
> wrong?
Depends on how many merges are required, and, the merge scheduler. In
this case (w/ 7000 segments, which is way too many, normally!),
assuming Concurrent
Add more methods to manipulate QueryNodeProcessorPipeline elements
--
Key: LUCENE-1937
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1937:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1937.patch
The patch adds five methods:
QueryNodeProcessor getProces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1937:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.1)
2.9
Fix Version/s: (was: 2
>> If you're doing a full optimize, you're still using a single thread. Am I
>> wrong?
>
> Depends on how many merges are required, and, the merge scheduler. In
> this case (w/ 7000 segments, which is way too many, normally!),
> assuming ConcurrentMergeScheduler, multiple threads will be used sin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1936.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 820756.
> Remove deprecated charset support from Greek and
Thank you very much for the detailed information everyone!
I will try to use the information to make my code better.
I have parsed out the optimization bits into a commandline app that runs the
optimize on another box. Its messy, but effective in keeping downtime to a
minimum. This will get the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761331#action_12761331
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
Robert: Do you want to take this again? It'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761333#action_12761333
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Uwe, sure. I will bring this patch up to speed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-1606:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir (was: Uwe Schindler)
> Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)
>
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>>> If you're doing a full optimize, you're still using a single thread. Am I
>>> wrong?
>>
>> Depends on how many merges are required, and, the merge scheduler. In
>> this case (w/ 7000 segments, which is way too many, normally!),
>> assumi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1857.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Added CHANGES.txt an committed revision: 820792
> Change NumericRangeQuer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761367#action_12761367
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1935:
--
Uwe, could you take a look at ScorerDocQueue?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1257:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1257-StringBuffer.patch
A first patch that replaces StringBuffer -> StringB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761372#action_12761372
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935:
---
Was it to avoid a perforance impact of cast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761372#action_12761372
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1935 at 10/1/09 3:31 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761374#action_12761374
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1935:
--
It was to avoid the performance impact of cas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761381#action_12761381
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935:
---
I think it could be rewritten and the missi
Precedence query parser using the contrib/queryparser framework
---
Key: LUCENE-1938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761387#action_12761387
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935:
---
By the way, the covariant overload is optim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761389#action_12761389
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1935:
-
Ive tried custom PQ's for use in sorting to avo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761389#action_12761389
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1935 at 10/1/09 4:07 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-944:
-
Attachment: lucene-944.patch
Some test fail with this test when a MatchAllDocQuery is used, e.g.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761392#action_12761392
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-944 at 10/1/09 4:11 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1938:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1938.patch
This patch contains a Precedence query parser. It's basica
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761387#action_12761387
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1935 at 10/1/09 4:16 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761395#action_12761395
]
Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-1935:
I shall perhaps regret asking this, but is there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761397#action_12761397
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
Hoss added some multireader test stuff that counts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761398#action_12761398
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1932:
--
I just saw now that a test case is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761399#action_12761399
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935:
---
The implementation of Lucene's PriorityQueu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761402#action_12761402
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
So this was always there - but in the past, becaus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761401#action_12761401
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-944:
--
Yeah I figured it has to do with that, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761403#action_12761403
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
bq. but it seems weird to me that a call to scorer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761405#action_12761405
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-1938:
--
Yes, let's just remove the old PrecedenceQuer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761406#action_12761406
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-944:
--
When we change this, don't forget to remove th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761407#action_12761407
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
Part of it or all of it is that the tests that are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761408#action_12761408
]
Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-1935:
thanks Uwe, I thought I would regret asking, good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761409#action_12761409
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1935:
---
Paul: Do you want to provide a patch for Sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761409#action_12761409
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1935 at 10/1/09 4:45 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761421#action_12761421
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
A second part is that there looks to be some insan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761423#action_12761423
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1935:
-
bq. I thought I would regret asking
Why? Now a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761424#action_12761424
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-944:
--
{quote}
So this was always there - but in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1458:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.tar.bz2
LUCENE-1458-back-compat.patch
Attach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Bowen updated LUCENE-1489:
Attachment: lucene1489.patch
Here's a patch to Highlighter.java that fixes the examples. The basi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761439#action_12761439
]
David Bowen commented on LUCENE-1489:
-
Mark, I tried the approach you suggested of usi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761440#action_12761440
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-944:
bq. Now I just hope all bugs are in the tests...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12761441#action_12761441
]
David Bowen commented on LUCENE-1489:
-
By the way. here is the output from Chris's tes
93 matches
Mail list logo
