[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765433#action_12765433 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979: --- I think you missed to delete IndexComitPoin

RE: svn commit: r825022 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ contrib/instantiated/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/instantiated/ contrib/instantiated/src/test/org/apache/lucene/store/instantiated/ contrib/memo

Sorry, I think you missed to delete IndexCommitPoint. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: busc...@apache.org [mailto:busc...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:39 AM > To: java-

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1979. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 825022. > Remove remaining deprecations from indexer p

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765427#action_12765427 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979: --- Also added an appropriate entry to the bw b

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765417#action_12765417 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979: --- I would add the change in CHANGES.txt, too.

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1973) Remove deprecated query components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 10/13/09 11:03 PM: --

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1973) Remove deprecated query components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1973: -- Description: Remove the rest of the deprecated query components. (was: Remove deprecated quer

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765416#action_12765416 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979: --- Well IndexCommitPoint was deprecated, so I

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765414#action_12765414 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1979 at 10/13/09 10:59 PM: --

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765414#action_12765414 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979: --- There are two possibilities: - Changing th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765408#action_12765408 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979: --- Hi Uwe, thanks for taking a look here. Ho

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765407#action_12765407 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979: --- Hi Michael, I see no problem in bw patch :

Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-trunk #978

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

: I think the other tests do not catch it because the error only happens : if the docID is over 8192 (the chunk size that BooleanScorer uses). : Most of our tests work on smaller sets of docs. I don't have time to try this out right now, but i wonder if just modifying the QueryUtils wrap* fun

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765354#action_12765354 ] tangfulin commented on LUCENE-1974: --- Good job, Thanks you all for this! Though we have

Re: IndexInput not being closed

It's OK... IndexInputs have never all been closed. IndexInput clones don't need to be closed as they share the same resources with the original. They are also often cached in thread locals. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Gui Forget wrote: > Hello, > Th

IndexInput not being closed

Hello, This is my first email to this list so I hope I posted it to the right list. I'm in the process of upgrading my web application from Lucene 2.0 to Lucene 2.4.1. Things went pretty smoothly but I noticed that some IndexInput were created via cloning but were never closed. The trace

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1982) BoxIds of CartesianTierPlotter in Lucene spatial seems incorrect

BoxIds of CartesianTierPlotter in Lucene spatial seems incorrect Key: LUCENE-1982 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1982 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1960) Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765344#action_12765344 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1960: --- How shall we proceed here? (see my previous

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765342#action_12765342 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1974: --- {quote} I think we need to spin 2.9.1 for t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765341#action_12765341 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974: +1... we need many more tests tha

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Wang updated LUCENE-1969: -- Attachment: kamikaze.contrib.patch2 again it was the package name. redid local run and all tests pass.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765338#action_12765338 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979: --- OK, thanks for the confirmation. Then this

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765336#action_12765336 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1979: bq. Is it correct that we keep In

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765332#action_12765332 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1974: -- bq. It's also concerning that no unit test ca

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979: -- Attachment: lucene-1979.patch Same patch as before, but with IndexReader#getFieldCacheKey() un

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1974. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 2.9.1 Thanks tangfu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765327#action_12765327 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974: bq. It's also concerning that no

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765324#action_12765324 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1969: -- As a package name, perhaps something like "do

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979: -- Attachment: lucene-1979-bw.patch Patch for the back-compat trunk. Hmm, everything passes, exc

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1969: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > adding kamikaze to lucene contrib > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765320#action_12765320 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979: --- OK, will do! > Remove remaining deprecatio

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1969: --- Attachment: kamikaze.test.out Output when I ran "ant test". > adding kamikaze to lu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765319#action_12765319 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969: Also, John, have you started the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765318#action_12765318 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969: Excellent, I can now run ant test

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765316#action_12765316 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1979: bq. IndexReader#getFieldCacheKey(

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765315#action_12765315 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1974: --- It's also concerning that no unit test catc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765310#action_12765310 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974: Ugh, this is the bug: {code} Ind

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979: -- Attachment: lucene-1979.patch Removes almost all deprecations from the indexer package. The on

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Wang updated LUCENE-1969: -- Attachment: build.xml updated build.xml with package name changes. > adding kamikaze to lucene contri

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765306#action_12765306 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-1969: --- My bad! The build.xml is not updated with the packa

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765303#action_12765303 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1974: - Hoss man, i played with this a little, maybe th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765299#action_12765299 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974: Hmm... seems to be a bug in Boole

Re: (possible) heinous scoring bug in 2.9.0: LUCENE-1974 ? ? ?

I'm looking at it... Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > Can someone smarter then me review the patch in LUCENE-1974... > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974 > > ...on the surface this seems to suggest a pretty serious error somewhere in > the low lev

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1974: -- Assignee: Michael McCandless > BooleanQuery can not find all matches in specia

(possible) heinous scoring bug in 2.9.0: LUCENE-1974 ? ? ?

Can someone smarter then me review the patch in LUCENE-1974... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974 ...on the surface this seems to suggest a pretty serious error somewhere in the low level scoring code when a BooleanQuery is involved. (If this really is a bug, and not just me

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1974: - Attachment: LUCENE-1974.test.patch tweaked test so that it can be applied to 2.4.1 (by removing readOnly

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1974: - Attachment: LUCENE-1974.test.patch this is the same as the previously attached test but i've simplified

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

OK, I made the draft a bit "more neutral" by pointing out the downsides clearer. However, I think we have to explain reasons for and against the change, otherwise people who didn't follow these discussions on java-dev will have no idea why we actually want to make a change at all. I added your

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1938) Precedence query parser using the contrib/queryparser framework

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani reassigned LUCENE-1938: Assignee: (was: Adriano Crestani) > Precedence query parser using the contrib/

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1937) Add more methods to manipulate QueryNodeProcessorPipeline elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1937: - Attachment: LUCENE-1937_10_13_2009.patch New patch, now QueryNodeProcessorPipeline imple

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1937) Add more methods to manipulate QueryNodeProcessorPipeline elements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani reassigned LUCENE-1937: Assignee: (was: Adriano Crestani) > Add more methods to manipulate QueryNodePr

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1981) Allow access to entries in the field cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1981. -- Resolution: Invalid > Allow access to entries in the field cache > ---

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

Excellent, thanks! Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I've added missing enums classes, but everything else is looking good so > far. > > Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote: >>     [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1969) adding kamikaze to lucene contrib

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765246#action_12765246 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969: Patch looks good! How do I run t

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

I've added missing enums classes, but everything else is looking good so far. Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765234#action_12765234 > ] > > Mich

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

No problem! I'm excited about the new branch! Have to try to write some codecs now... Michael On 10/13/09 2:09 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: Woops sorry I missed that! Yes this'll be our first test :) Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Michael Busch wrote: On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Mic

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765237#action_12765237 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458: --- By the way, a lot of these PriorityQueues c

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

Woops sorry I missed that! Yes this'll be our first test :) Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Michael Busch wrote: >> >> Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer package? >> There are not many more left, shouldn't be much

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765234#action_12765234 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458: OK I think I've committed Mark's

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > I've mentioned it several times on java-dev and LUCENE-1698 that I'd like to > ask the user > community and nobody objected. It's the old polling problem - how you ask influences the outcome (as I said below), and you didn't say exactly how

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Michael Busch wrote: Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer package? There are not many more left, shouldn't be much work. I wasn't quick enough for you :) Working on LUCENE-1979 now - that will be the first test on how good svn merge is! Mi

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mark Miller wrote: For the record - I still don't see what we gain but confusion. The major numbers don't have any significant meaning in terms of features or advancements. That's a perception we don't have control over. A release incrementing the major release number i

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

On 10/13/09 1:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I think I'm against sending such a request for feedback - and I think we already know what the results will be. I've mentioned it several times on java-dev and LUCENE-1698 that I'd like to ask the user community and nobody objected. The email rea

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

On 10/13/09 1:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote: I think it should be more clear that the devs have not come to an agreement on this change yet, irregardless of the communities input. OK I made a few changes near the end to make that clearer. How's it now? Draft: Hello Lucene users: In the past

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

I think I'm against sending such a request for feedback - and I think we already know what the results will be. The email reads like "we want to do this, OK?" - and the beneficiaries of what is a volunteer effort are likely to respond overwhelmingly "OK!". One could take the reverse position and p

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

For the record - I still don't see what we gain but confusion. The major numbers don't have any significant meaning in terms of features or advancements. If we want to remove deprecations faster after deprecating in 4.1, we should just not release 4.2,4.3,4.4,4.5, and then 4.9. We should go from

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

I think it should be more clear that the devs have not come to an agreement on this change yet, irregardless of the communities input. Michael McCandless wrote: > Looks good! > > Mike > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I wrote a draft for a mail I'd li

Re: Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

Looks good! Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > Hi all, > > I wrote a draft for a mail I'd like to send to java-user to get some > feedback about the proposed changes to our backwards-compatibility policy we > discussed here and on LUCENE-1698. > Let me know what you thi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765204#action_12765204 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458: - Looks pretty simple - the field is not getting

Draft for java-user mail about backwards-compatibility policy changes

Hi all, I wrote a draft for a mail I'd like to send to java-user to get some feedback about the proposed changes to our backwards-compatibility policy we discussed here and on LUCENE-1698. Let me know what you think please! Michael Hello Lucene users: In the past we have discussed our bac

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1756) contrib/memory: PatternAnalyzerTest is a very, very, VERY, bad unit test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1756: Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) Fix Version/s: 3.0 Assignee: Rober

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-944) Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-944. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 824870. > Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery > ---

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1342) 64bit JVM crashes on Linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Amit Nithian updated LUCENE-1342: - Attachment: hs_err_pid13693.log > 64bit JVM crashes on Linux > -- > >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1342) 64bit JVM crashes on Linux

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765180#action_12765180 ] Amit Nithian commented on LUCENE-1342: -- I just encountered this error in our own QA e

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1606) Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606: Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch updated patch to trunk: * add support for optional regex features *

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765149#action_12765149 ] Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 10/13/09 10:45 AM:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1981) Allow access to entries in the field cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765157#action_12765157 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1981: -- We shouldn't tie IndexReader/SegmentReader to

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-944) Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-944: - Attachment: lucene-944-bw.patch lucene-944.patch Tiny change in QueryUtils#checkS

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1981) Allow access to entries in the field cache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Hill updated LUCENE-1981: - Attachment: lucene-1981.patch Here's a sample implementation. There are a number of possible ways to do

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765149#action_12765149 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458: - Whoops - double check the wrong index splitter

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1981) Allow access to entries in the field cache

Allow access to entries in the field cache -- Key: LUCENE-1981 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: Search Aff

Re: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/l

Right. I was confused about that too. Michael On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement method is the method itself. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1980) Fix javadocs after deprecation removal

Fix javadocs after deprecation removal -- Key: LUCENE-1980 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1980 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Uwe Schindler Fi

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1979) Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package

Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package -- Key: LUCENE-1979 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Components: Index

RE: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/l

I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement method is the method itself. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tu

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer package? There are not many more left, shouldn't be much work. Michael On 10/13/09 5:47 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK I will cut a branch& commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless anyone has objections soonish... I'll also

Re: svn commit: r824781 - in /lucene/java/trunk: ./ contrib/memory/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/memory/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/ contrib/remote/src/java/org/apache/l

On 10/13/09 7:28 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote: @@ -115,7 +95,6 @@ *Applications should usually call {...@link Searcher#search(Query)} or * {...@link Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead. * @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses - * @deprecated use {...@link #search(Weight, Filt

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1458: Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch Latest to trunk - still issues with GC and the reopen thread safety

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1959) Index Splitter

I think it was me - ran by itself with eclipse - must have been an incremental compile issue or something. Mark Miller wrote: > Hmm ... doing some heavy merging so it might be me, but there also might > be a test failure with this now and some of the trunk changes ... > > Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) w

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1959) Index Splitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1959. Resolution: Fixed Thanks Andrzej! > Index Splitter > -- > >

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1959) Index Splitter

Hmm ... doing some heavy merging so it might be me, but there also might be a test failure with this now and some of the trunk changes ... Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpan

RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

I think the big changes in the o.a.l.search package are over... :-) - Worked the whole day on it. Merging branches with TortoiseSVN works really good, you can even edit the conflicts directly in the diff view. Used it when fixing the IR/IW hell deprecations in the BW branch. Uwe - Uwe Schind

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

Yes please! Mike On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > I can trunk it once more if you'd like - its already pretty out of date :) > > If you havn't started anyway ... > > > Michael McCandless wrote: >> OK I will cut a branch & commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless >> anyone h

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1959) Index Splitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765101#action_12765101 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1959: --- Committed revision 824798. > Index

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1973) Remove deprecated query components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 10/13/09 7:57 AM: ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1972) Remove (deprecated) ExtendedFieldCache and Auto/Custom caches and lot's of deprecated sort logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765098#action_12765098 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1972: --- Committed revision: 824792 > Remove (depre

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1959) Index Splitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765097#action_12765097 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1959: --- Indeed, thanks for the fix - I'll c

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1972) Remove (deprecated) ExtendedFieldCache and Auto/Custom caches and lot's of deprecated sort logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1972: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1972-2.patch Some small additional deprecated removals after finishing the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1973) Remove deprecated query components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1973: --- There are still some of them: - explain() i

  1   2   >