[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-504) FuzzyQuery produces a "java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException" in PriorityQueue.initialize if I use Integer.MAX_VALUE as BooleanQuery.MaxClauseCount

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773421#action_12773421 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-504: -- Nadav: I suggest to keep Lucene's PriorityQueu

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-504) FuzzyQuery produces a "java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException" in PriorityQueue.initialize if I use Integer.MAX_VALUE as BooleanQuery.MaxClauseCount

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773421#action_12773421 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-504 at 11/4/09 8:43 AM: --

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #998

Looks like SVN hiccup'd. Mike On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: > See > > -- > [...truncated 1575 lines...] > AU         > contrib/benchmark/src/java/org/apache/lucene

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2026) Refactoring of IndexWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773429#action_12773429 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2026: +1! IndexWriter has become immen

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2026) Refactoring of IndexWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773432#action_12773432 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2026: --- {quote} I think we should also pull out Rea

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2027) Deprecate Directory.touchFile

Deprecate Directory.touchFile - Key: LUCENE-2027 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2027 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Store Reporter: Michael McCa

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1879) Parallel incremental indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773466#action_12773466 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1879: I wonder if we could change Lucen

Free live video streaming of ApacheCon US 2009

Team, For those Lucene fanatics not in Oakland this week for ApacheCon US, don't miss the FREE live video streaming, starting today: http://streaming.linux-magazin.de/en/program-apachecon-us-2009.htm Note that there are many talks available, covering Apache Hadoop, Apache HTTPD, Lucene, as wel

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2028) FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped.

FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped. - Key: LUCENE-2028 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2028 Project: Lucene - Java Issue

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2028) FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Danish Contractor updated LUCENE-2028: -- Description: The Filtered Term Enumeration seems to skip the first term present in the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2028) FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Danish Contractor updated LUCENE-2028: -- Attachment: FilteredTermEnum.java My version of the file. > FilteredTermEnum.Java - T

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2027) Deprecate Directory.touchFile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773543#action_12773543 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2027: - We talked about this yesterday night @A

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2027) Deprecate Directory.touchFile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773546#action_12773546 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2027: Why not simply deprecate and then

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2027) Deprecate Directory.touchFile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773548#action_12773548 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2027: --- Missed this issue, from java-user: We disc

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2028) FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773550#action_12773550 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2028: --- There is nothing wrong with FilteredTermEnu

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2028) FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-2028. - Resolution: Invalid > FilteredTermEnum.Java - The first term in the enumeration is skipped. > --

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2029) Allow separate control over whether body is stored or analyzed

Allow separate control over whether body is stored or analyzed -- Key: LUCENE-2029 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2029 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvem

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2030) CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object

CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object Key: LUCENE-2030 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2030 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Impr

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2030) CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2030: Attachment: LUCENE-2030.patch > CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-504) FuzzyQuery produces a "java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException" in PriorityQueue.initialize if I use Integer.MAX_VALUE as BooleanQuery.MaxClauseCount

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-504: - Attachment: LUCENE-504.patch Here is a patch for this issue, using j.u.PriorityQueue. It currentl

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1997) Explore performance of multi-PQ vs single-PQ sorting API

If I'm understanding the multi-PQ approach correctly, the multi-PQ could enable Solr for example to cache results per segment, whereas the single-PQ will not. This raises the question of how useful results caching is to Solr going forward? Will the lack of results caching in the NRT use case be a

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers --- Key: LUCENE-2031 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4

People.apache.org is down? Wanted to look at it, but cannot reach from ApacheCon! Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Tuesday

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773614#action_12773614 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2031: - +1 go on and move it > Move PatternAna

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2031: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/anal

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2031: Attachment: LUCENE-2031.patch Hi, although unrelated really, the MemoryIndex had some code where i

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313: - Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch I wanted to simplify a little more to more easily understa

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2032) DistanceFilter not Serializable

DistanceFilter not Serializable --- Key: LUCENE-2032 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Search Affects Versions: 2.9

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-504) FuzzyQuery produces a "java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException" in PriorityQueue.initialize if I use Integer.MAX_VALUE as BooleanQuery.MaxClauseCount

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-504: - Attachment: LUCENE-504.patch Here a patch, that fixes FuzzyQuery. It uses j.u.PQ and has a small

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1879) Parallel incremental indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773663#action_12773663 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1879: --- I realize the current implementation that's

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2032) Spatial Filters not Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joey Surls updated LUCENE-2032: --- Description: I am using Lucene in a distributed setup. The Filters in the spatial project aren't S

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2031. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 832889. > Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to co

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2031) Move PatternAnalyzer out of contrib/memory to contrib/analyzers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2031: Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) Fix Version/s: 3.0 Assignee: Rober

Re: unit test speed for TestCustomScoreQuery

I'll be attaching a new patch to JIRA-1844 after all the tests run, a bit later this evening. The two files I changed move/remove calls to CheckUtils.check(query); I arbitrarily limited the random query test in TestBooleanShouldMatch to only checking the first 100, on the theory that we were at di

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2033) exposed MultiTermDocs and MultiTermPositions from package protected to public

exposed MultiTermDocs and MultiTermPositions from package protected to public - Key: LUCENE-2033 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2033 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1844) Speed up junit tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson updated LUCENE-1844: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1844.patch moved/skipped calls to CheckUtils.check In TestCustomScoreQu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2032) Spatial Filters not Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773704#action_12773704 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2032: - Hi Joey, do you have a patch by any chance? i

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors - Key: LUCENE-2034 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2034: Attachment: LUCENE-2034.patch Attached a patch with a base class that solves the code dupl

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773723#action_12773723 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2034: - btw. if somebody comes up with a better

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2012) Add @Override annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2012: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2012-tests.patch test for the patches, it also fixes whitespace where broke

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2012) Add @Override annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773743#action_12773743 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2012: --- Committed revision: 832972 > Add @Override

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313: - Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch The tests pass, and the previous kinks seem to be worked o

Junit4

Now that we're going for Java 5, I took some time this evening to poke at using Junit4. I've done enough for proof of concept (POC), but before going further I wondered if there's enough interest or cautions or objections. It's actually not bad. I was afraid that we'd have to do an "all or none" c

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313: - Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch Alright, the issue was simple, OneMerge.registerDone was b

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2012) Add @Override annotations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773740#action_12773740 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2012 at 11/5/09 2:50 AM:

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2030) CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2030: - Assignee: Uwe Schindler > CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected obje

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2030) CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12773758#action_12773758 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2030: --- This patch breaks serialization because the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2030) CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final protected object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2030: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2030.patch Fixed patch. > CachingSpanFilter synchronizing on a none final

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2032) Spatial Filters not Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2032: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2032.patch This patch fixes it in trunk. > Spatial Filters not Serializabl

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2032) Spatial Filters not Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2032. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Assignee: Uwe Schindler Committed revis