[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Description:
The DisjunctionMaxQuery class hashCode() implementation is non-deterministic.
It uses disjuncts.ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2146.patch
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
> -
DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
Key: LUCENE-2146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
TokenStream.close() is called multiple times per TokenStream instance
-
Key: LUCENE-2145
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2145
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789051#action_12789051
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2144:
I think we shouldn't test the inv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789021#action_12789021
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-2144:
-
Committed change to trunk.
In 3.0 comment out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Bowen updated LUCENE-1489:
Attachment: LUCENE-1489.patch
Updated patch to work with tokenizer API changes.
> highlighter pr
Checkout the 3.0 branch, then use SVN merge on trunk for the revision mike
committed. In Windows with Tortoise SVN you can click with right mouse in
log windows and select "Merge Revision To", maybe the same with Subclipse
etc.
The user found this bug in 2.9, so also merge to 2.9?
-
Uwe Schin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2144:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2144-30.patch
Attached diffs from my merge back onto 3.0.
> Inst
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788966#action_12788966
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-2144:
-
bq. at
org.apache.lucene.store.instantiated.Te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788959#action_12788959
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2135:
There is some discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788957#action_12788957
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2144:
Hmm -- I did the svn merge back t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788956#action_12788956
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
Mark,
that's great to he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788951#action_12788951
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/10/09 9:48 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788950#action_12788950
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-2144:
-
bq. We should fix this on at least 3.0 as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788951#action_12788951
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. That is, it adds a lot of duplicated code /
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788943#action_12788943
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2144:
Patch looks good; tests pass. I'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788936#action_12788936
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
bq. bq.LUCENE-831 sti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2144:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> InstantiatedIndexReader does not handle #termDo
I'll give this a whirl tonight. The reason I was wondering what language
is to insure that my machine *also* tests the offending locale.
A bit of a nit, the flaw in the approach with LocalizedTestCase is
that *every* test in the class is run against *all* locales..
To change this, as I und
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788925#action_12788925
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2142:
--
+1
> FieldCache.getStringIndex should not th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788908#action_12788908
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. LUCENE-831 still requires a static FieldCac
i just right clicked TestQueryParser and said 'run as junit test'
i could not tell which locales failed, (just testing your original patch, no
modifications)
the way they are shown instead is like an array of 135 elements...
[0]: testCJK[0] (0.000s)
testSimple[0] (0.001s)
...
[1]: testCJK[1]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-2144:
Attachment: LUCENE-2144.txt
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 36 minutes 4 seconds
> InstantiatedInde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788896#action_12788896
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
bq. I don't know that bac
Yep, that sure makes me nervous too. I've never seen a failure in IntelliJ
or from a
shell window.
How often do you need to run it to see an error? And what language is it
using?
And what test?
I can try this in my IntelliJ setup and see if I can reproduce it. Note I'm
running
on a Macbook Pro...
InstantiatedIndexReader does not handle #termDocs(null) correct (AllTermDocs)
-
Key: LUCENE-2144
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2144
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1274#action_1274
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2122:
-
Hi Erick, I played with this patch some and (no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1273#action_1273
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2143:
bq. So why also, are you only pic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin closed LUCENE-774.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> TopDocs and TopFieldDocs does not implement equals and hashCode
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788874#action_12788874
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
I don't know that back compat is really a conce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788871#action_12788871
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-2143:
-
So why also, are you only picking one indexing
Understand why NRT performance is affected by flush frequency
-
Key: LUCENE-2143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2143
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788863#action_12788863
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
bq. This patch is a good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788856#action_12788856
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2026:
I think what you're describing is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788846#action_12788846
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
My impression is that this is not much differen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788840#action_12788840
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2026:
-
Oh, forgive me if I just said something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788838#action_12788838
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2026:
-
We need an ability to see segment write
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2123:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2123-lucene30.patch
Solution 2 for 3.0 branch that inverts the ScoreTerm co
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Which of these do you think this patch *should* address before committing?
> Just the last two?
Well... I'd really like pluggability to a different value source, with
"FieldUninverter" just being the one we have today, and adding
control/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788811#action_12788811
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2123:
---
I already closed this issue, but still open
Mike:
Which of these do you think this patch *should* address before committing?
Just the last two?
As many as Christian has energy for ?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi
FieldCache.getStringIndex should not throw exception if term count exceeds doc
count
Key: LUCENE-2142
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788798#action_12788798
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2133:
This patch is a good step forward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788764#action_12788764
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1377 at 12/10/09 4:03 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788764#action_12788764
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. as Solr is not on Lucene 3.x yet (and doesn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788762#action_12788762
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. with the exception of a few core committer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788758#action_12788758
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. one thing we could do, is to just h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788753#action_12788753
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
one thing we could do, is to just have a genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788745#action_12788745
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. i think we want to remove, not crea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788744#action_12788744
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
ok i am sorry, i didnt realize what you are say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788743#action_12788743
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. Really? we don't add any analysis c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788739#action_12788739
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. As I've said before, though, it often seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788731#action_12788731
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
(kind of rambling, but...)
We probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788719#action_12788719
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1377:
Here's a semi-concrete proposal:
Eric did you run md5sum / sha1sum ?
What does it say?
simon
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I was doing some research on past releases of Lucene and downloaded the
> archived 2.4.1 src .zip and got this:
>
> ~/Downloads: unzip lucene-2.4.1-src.zip
> Archive: lucene-2.4.1-
thanks Erick, in this case we only need to worry about reporting failure, so
you know what locale your code does not work for.
for the other thing we can just run the default locale, then everything else
(including the default). This is how the current code works. The main thing
is that for exampl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788697#action_12788697
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2104:
Thanks for the info Uwe. I know the unlock is to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2123.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.1)
Committed in trunk and flex!
WARNI
Make String and StringIndex in field cache more RAM efficient
-
Key: LUCENE-2141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2141
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788666#action_12788666
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2138:
I think LUCENE-2026 should be lar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2123:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1
> Move FuzzyQuery rewrite as separate RewriteMode into MTQ, was: Highligh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788656#action_12788656
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2140:
This same sort of optimization wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788652#action_12788652
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2140:
bq. I would add this extra seetin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788646#action_12788646
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2123:
Latest patch looks great Uwe!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788641#action_12788641
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2139:
This looks like a great step forw
Hello Erik,
I just downloaded it from:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/lucene-2.4.1-src.zip
Size: 5.9 MB (6134777 bytes)
I'm having no errors, using "UnZip 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Debian."
on Debian 64bit.
If you're downloading from the same source, you could try again?
Best Regards,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788634#action_12788634
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2139:
Hi Simon,
Alright that sounds great. I will wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788630#action_12788630
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2139 at 12/10/09 9:54 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788630#action_12788630
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2139:
-
Thank you Chris!
Lets go with small iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-2139:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2139-Java5Only.patch
Attached updated version of the patch which is now compiled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788620#action_12788620
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2104:
---
The fix would be to add a javadocs comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788616#action_12788616
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2104:
---
The problem with NativeFSLock is that you c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788611#action_12788611
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2104:
Uwe, the problem is that unlock does nothing when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788599#action_12788599
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2104 at 12/10/09 8:54 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788599#action_12788599
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2104:
---
In general, there is no problem with Native
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2104:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2104.patch
Patch includes a test in TestLockFactory and fix in NativeFSLock.
> I
77 matches
Mail list logo
