[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790057#action_12790057
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Can't we just merge-sort into the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790063#action_12790063
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2146:
Actually... it's this a mis-use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790069#action_12790069
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2146:
---
And the patch is against 2.9 without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790107#action_12790107
]
wang commented on LUCENE-2146:
--
Thanks Michael and Uwe.
i understand it is not a bug.
I get the following Test failure with Java 1.5.0_22 of Slowlaris:
[junit] - Standard Output ---
[junit] Test failure of 'testLegacyDateRange' occurred under a different
Locale th_TH
[junit] Test failure of 'testDateRange' occurred under a different
Locale
I think so. This is likely the hard-to-reproduce problem I have been finding
testing Erick's junit4 patch for localization.
I think there is something wierd with the test itself, and has nothing to do
with junit 3 or 4...
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2104:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2104.patch
Changed NativeFSLock.release() to first obtain and then release the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2140.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Committed
random localization test failures
-
Key: LUCENE-2155
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
Priority:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2155:
Attachment: LUCENE-2155.patch
attached is a patch that not only clears all Calendar attributes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790233#action_12790233
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
Am I missing something? Why not using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790233#action_12790233
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2039 at 12/14/09 4:49 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2155.
-
Resolution: Fixed
random localization test failures
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790251#action_12790251
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2155:
-
Committed revision 890407.
This may not be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790260#action_12790260
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2120:
Jake/John, how can I run the Zoie
use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track IR.refCount and IW.closed
Key: LUCENE-2156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter copies the bufer over itsself. Instead it should
only set the length. Also optimize logic.
--
Key: LUCENE-2157
URL:
Oooh, nice...
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:26 PM, rm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rmuir
Date: Mon Dec 14 18:26:26 2009
New Revision: 890427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=890427view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-2155: add assertion to check if something changes default locale
behind our back when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2157:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2157.patch
DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter copies the bufer over itsself.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790284#action_12790284
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. Can't we just merge-sort into the
yeah i am convinced this is not a problem with your junit 4 patch Erick...
as Uwe ran into the same trouble I ran into with the existing
LocalizedTestCase
however, if you don't mind, I'd like to let it set with the junit 3 impl a
little bit longer and see if we get more random-hard-to-reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2156:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2156.patch
use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track IR.refCount and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790314#action_12790314
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2156:
-
Did I miss you exploiting 'atomicity'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790321#action_12790321
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
David, I assume you use a subclass of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790329#action_12790329
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2156:
You're right! AtomicBoolean is
Thanks for letting me know, it's quite a relief to be able to trust the
@Parameterized
stuff.
Just let me know if you need me to regenerate the patch whenever you want to
apply it. Between now and then I'll find something else to do G...
Erick
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2156:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2156.patch
New patch.
use AtomicInteger/Boolean to track
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790354#action_12790354
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2156:
-
bq. ensureOpen is only on a best effort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2157:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2157.patch
Now an even optimized IdentityEncode for payloads. It uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790360#action_12790360
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2156:
--
ensureOpen() is to help catch coding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790366#action_12790366
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Hmm good question. Actually,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790368#action_12790368
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. If you do take hold of it, do not hesitate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790369#action_12790369
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1785:
Make that... eliminate the *dead*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790373#action_12790373
]
David Kaelbling commented on LUCENE-2039:
-
{bq}
I do not see another way than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790373#action_12790373
]
David Kaelbling edited comment on LUCENE-2039 at 12/14/09 9:17 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790391#action_12790391
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. couldn't we pull a Term(s)Enum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790392#action_12790392
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
thanks for the pointer Earwin, its very useful
its possible the problems are not reproduceable because
they are a crazy problem with these tests.
Agree absolutely. I was just making sure we considered
the *possibility* that the paramaterized version was showing
an underlying Lucene problem rather than assuming the
fault was with Junit4.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790506#action_12790506
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-2120:
---
Hi Michael:
bq: Why does Zoie even retain 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790586#action_12790586
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. I would like to know how the paper
40 matches
Mail list logo
