On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:13:10 +0200, Bernhard Messer wrote:
> exactly, that's what i had in mind. I know that we have to allocate a
> new string object for every call, but this must be much cheaper than the
> current implementation which has to walk thru the whole array every time
> the method is
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:22:56 +0100, mark harwood wrote:
> Andrzej, have you tried contacting the Thinlet author
> to see if he would consider releasing the old Thinlet
> code under an Apache license?
If this doesn't work out, the quickest solution might be to code a
clean-room implementation of t
