[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857380#action_12857380
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. only one DW flushes at a time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857112#action_12857112
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael, nice! I guess I should've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853594#action_12853594
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael B, I was going to wait
David, I totally agree with this idea.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:58 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
I observed this problem when I started using Lucene (ages ago) and it's a
shame this situation persists. In summary, it would be tremendously useful
if Query objects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851017#action_12851017
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael B.: What you're talking about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851099#action_12851099
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}You only need one additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850754#action_12850754
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}I don't think we should delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850780#action_12850780
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}I mentioned the idea of having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850211#action_12850211
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Mike, lets do option 1. I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850223#action_12850223
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Currently the doc writer manages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850227#action_12850227
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Following up on the previous comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850253#action_12850253
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Of course then you'd need two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850260#action_12850260
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Also, I think we can remove the sync
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324.patch
The patch is not committable.
The basics are here. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850440#action_12850440
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
In regards to remap deletes. I looked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850449#action_12850449
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Mike, can you describe the difference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12849806#action_12849806
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael, I'm guessing this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12849808#action_12849808
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Actually, I just browsed the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12849844#action_12849844
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael, I'm working on a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12849965#action_12849965
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
I'm a little confused
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848188#action_12848188
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Brian, thanks for the explanation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847123#action_12847123
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
For the skip list, we could reuse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847140#action_12847140
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I'm hitting a weird error where after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847146#action_12847146
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
What's the status of this one? I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2312:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm hitting a weird error where after executing a ram buf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846526#action_12846526
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Mike, can you clarify why intUptos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846540#action_12846540
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I think the DW index reader needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846604#action_12846604
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Previously there was a discussion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845729#action_12845729
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}but my goal is it here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845735#action_12845735
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}This makes the reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845943#action_12845943
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I thought we're moving away from byte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845950#action_12845950
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}The tricky part is to make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845971#action_12845971
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
To clarify the above comment, DW's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846028#action_12846028
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Carrying over from LUCENE-2312. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846037#action_12846037
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Are there going to be issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846102#action_12846102
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael,
For LUCENE-2312, I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846110#action_12846110
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
NormsWriterPerField has a growing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846112#action_12846112
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Actually TermsHashField doesn't need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846220#action_12846220
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael, Agreed, can you outline how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846261#action_12846261
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I think the easiest way to test out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845374#action_12845374
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}Good question on skipping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845404#action_12845404
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Pre-advanced apology for permanently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845448#action_12845448
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
The code is from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845493#action_12845493
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}Ahh, I think it's because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845503#action_12845503
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Also wanted to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845663#action_12845663
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I have a test case showing the term
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845679#action_12845679
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Basic term positions working, need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845680#action_12845680
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
In thinking about the terms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845696#action_12845696
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Payloads works (non-lazy loading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845721#action_12845721
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Just to clarify, I think Mike's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845149#action_12845149
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Mike, rollback is pausing all threads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845179#action_12845179
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I got the basics of the term enum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844891#action_12844891
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
From LUCENE-2293: {quote}(b-tree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844893#action_12844893
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
{quote}Change the approach for how we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844926#action_12844926
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
bq. Probably one DW instance per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845030#action_12845030
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
Mike, Why does DocFieldConsumers have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845036#action_12845036
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
A few notes so far:
* IW flush could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845041#action_12845041
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
* IW commitMerge calls docWriter's
: 3.0.1
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Fix For: 3.0.2
In order to offer user's near realtime search, without incurring
an indexing performance penalty, we can implement search on
IndexWriter's RAM buffer. This is the buffer that is filled in
RAM as documents are indexed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844749#action_12844749
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
In regards to the terms dictionary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844826#action_12844826
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I set out implementing a simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844828#action_12844828
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
{quote}but does anyone out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843385#action_12843385
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1709:
--
Robert, very nice!
Parallelize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12841960#action_12841960
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
{quote}I think we have two options
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12841342#action_12841342
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
bq. But WaitQueue would go away
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840918#action_12840918
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
Mike, good one! Would having a doc
Lets go to JUnit 4 if possible...
Does it provide method level testing? (i.e. one doesn't need to
execute every test method just to check the results of one method)
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok this seems a discussion related to JUnit 4, so I'll port
probably a personal preference.
I've never tried to learn a command-line invocation of a test
case for a single test method, I've always just used the IDE
to run individual methods
Erick
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12832638#action_12832638
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1720:
--
When's this ready to test with Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831095#action_12831095
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2255:
--
You're not the first to report
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12831116#action_12831116
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2255:
--
bq. What keeps you from attaching
Defaulting NIOFSDir could account for some of the recent speed
improvements users have been reporting in Lucene 2.9. So removing it
as a default could reverse those and people could then report Lucene
3.X has slowed...
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com
J,
The javadocs are illustrating there's no need to create new
IndexSearchers for each query.
Jason
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, jchang jchangkihat...@gmail.com wrote:
The javadocs for IndexSearcher in Lucene 3.0.0 read: For performance
reasons it is recommended to open only one
I always turn CFS off because it's extra work (no payoff), how's it
possible to run into an out of fd limit with a merge factor of 10?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
At the same time, seeing how some people benchmark systems
Greetin's John,
2.9 and 3.0 don't use a RAMDir... Deletes are held in RAM however so
on power off, those would be lost.
Jason
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:10 PM, jchang jchangkihat...@gmail.com wrote:
Lucene 2.9.0 has near real time indexing, writing to a RAMDir which gets
flushed to disk when
And generally, if anybody has any advice on high-throughput indexing with
Lucene and what kind of numbers I can acheive, I'd welcome the feedback.
I believe it's directly related to how often IW.getReader is called.
The longer the duration between calls, larger the resultant new
segment is
Zoie keeps track of an index version on disk alongside the Lucene index
which it uses to decide where it must reindex from to catch up if it there
have been incoming indexing events while the server was out of commission.
This begs a little more clarity... Sounds like a transaction log. Oh
Actually, unless IW.commit is called, all changes after the last
commit will be lost (because the segment infos file will not have been
written).
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetin's John,
2.9 and 3.0 don't use a RAMDir... Deletes
Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Zoie keeps track of an index version on disk alongside the Lucene
index which it uses to decide where it must reindex from to catch up if
it
there have been incoming
Maybe the default can be conditional on the platform like NIOFSDirectory.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:20:17PM -0500, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Should we really still be defaulting to true for setUseCompoundFile? Do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797679#action_12797679
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
bq. jira table output.
Mike's Python
An,
You're trying to add indexes and get a reader in a single call to IW?
Jason
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:58 AM, An Hong an.h...@i365.com wrote:
I’ve a requirement that when creating an IndexWriter on an existing index, I
need its getReader() to see the existing content. I’ve modified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797490#action_12797490
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
The benchmark code has jira table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797499#action_12797499
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
There's a bunch of formatting changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796705#action_12796705
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313:
--
the patch version seems to be about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796763#action_12796763
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313:
--
{quote}Lucene 3.0 is able to process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12796823#action_12796823
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
Grant,
This issue could be useful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12792629#action_12792629
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2026:
--
{quote}Anecdotally, at Eventful one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790827#action_12790827
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2164:
--
This issue illustrates why the ram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790986#action_12790986
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2164:
--
{quote}I've been wondering whether we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12791125#action_12791125
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2164:
--
{quote}max(1, min(3, numberOfCores
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790284#action_12790284
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. Can't we just merge-sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790391#action_12790391
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
bq. couldn't we pull a Term(s)Enum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789971#action_12789971
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2026:
--
I think large scale NRT installations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789985#action_12789985
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1785:
--
We probably need to figure out a way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12788449#action_12788449
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2138:
--
I'm curious, will flex indexing
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
This is needed for backwards compatible support with Solr, and is a spin-off
from SOLR-1606.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2138:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2138.patch
IndexWriter has an API to set and get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1785:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1785.patch
The sanity check is fixed by skipping the entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783322#action_12783322
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2061:
--
Mike, I tried running nrtBench.py
1 - 100 of 812 matches
Mail list logo
