[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857904#action_12857904
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2287:
-
Hey Michael - there is a lot of reformat
On 04/16/2010 12:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Mark Miller <mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'd be for this plan if I really thought the stable branch would
get similar attention to the experimental branch - but I have some
dou
I'd be for this plan if I really thought the stable branch would get
similar attention to the experimental branch - but I have some doubts
about that. Its a fairly small dev community in comparison to other
projects that do this ...
Dev on the experimental latest greatest fun branch, or the mo
If you absolutely cannot re-index, and you have *no* access to the data
again - you are one ballsy mofo to upgrade to a new version of Lucene
for "features". It means you likely BASE jump in your free time?
On 04/15/2010 10:14 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Coming in late to the discussion, and wit
I don't read what you wrote and what Mike wrote as even close to the
same.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Ahh ... a dream finally comes true ... what a great way to start a
day :). +1 !!!
I have some questions/comments tho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857155#action_12857155
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2393:
-
Perhaps this should be combined with high
On 04/14/2010 12:29 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:30:14AM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
The thing I keep going back to is that somehow Lucene has managed for years
(and I mean lots of years) w/o stuff like Version and all this massive back
compatibility checking.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856916#action_12856916
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2159:
-
There is an excellent section on it in
: Improvement
Components: contrib/spellchecker
Reporter: Mark Miller
Priority: Trivial
These settings seem odd - I'd like to investigate what makes most sense here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855748#action_12855748
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2386:
-
bq. Hmmm... I think the back compat brea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855740#action_12855740
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2386:
-
{quote}I do think this is a good change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855732#action_12855732
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2386:
-
Is this change worth it with all of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855489#action_12855489
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2372:
-
bq.If I make it final and
+1 - lets
Setting maxMergeMB does not limit the size of segments you will see - it
simply limits what segments will be merged - segments over maxMergeMB
will not be merged with other segments - you can still buffer up a ton
of docs in RAM and flush a segment larger than maxMergeMB, or merge n
segments sm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854899#action_12854899
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2074:
-
{quote}Uwe, must this be coupled with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853402#action_12853402
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1895:
-
I put this up not knowing really anyt
I also like the idea of a very basic analyzer set - I think you should
still be able to do things with just the core jar - even if its only
very basic things.
On 03/26/2010 11:56 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
That will be also heavy ANT build refactoring (oh no...). But I am also for a
basic analy
On 03/26/2010 09:07 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I'm happy to announce that the PMC has accepted Shai Erera as
Lucene/Solr committer!
Welcome aboard Shai,
Mike
PS: it's custom to introduce yourself with a brief bio :)
-
To u
olr part.
Btw: This machine is a Solr virgin, Solr never ran on it before.
Michael
On 3/23/10 1:00 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Robert very recently committed some stuff that parallelizes the solr
tests
that may need to be worked out in all cases still (if that is indeed the
problem here
Robert very recently committed some stuff that parallelizes the solr
tests that may need to be worked out in all cases still (if that is
indeed the problem here). A variety of devs have tested it, but there
may be a lingering issue?
No helpful errors printed above BUILD FAILED? The line the er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848712#action_12848712
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1709:
-
+1 on removing those flags - personally I
This looks good to me.
+1 on landing flex now.
On 03/22/2010 08:27 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi all,
the discussion where to do the development after the merge, now gets actual:
Currently a lusolr test-trunk is done as a branch inside solr
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branche
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847931#action_12847931
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1814:
-
Chris Male mentioned to me that he thinks
th
Lucene and Solr.
Thanks to everyone that contributed to getting all this working!
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On 03/17/2010 12:40 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Okay, so this looks good to me (a few others seemed to like it -
though Lucene-Dev was somehow dropped earlier) - lets tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846711#action_12846711
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2323:
-
This reorg is a great a great step for con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846622#action_12846622
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2320:
-
+1 - I've had to do this in the past
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846542#action_12846542
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2305:
-
Ah, yes - I didnt remember your comment r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846462#action_12846462
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2305:
-
Hmm - if I remember right, this is o
On 03/16/2010 02:57 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
On 03/16/2010 at 6:06 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Does anyone know how other projects fold in IRC...?
I gather from the deafening silence that we'll have to figure it out as we
On 03/16/2010 10:09 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
Also, we're in review-and-commit process, not commit-and-review. Changes have
to be
proposed, discussed and ideally attached to jira as patches first.
Correction, just for the sake of
On 03/16/2010 09:05 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On 2010-03-16 12:29, Mark Miller wrote:
From our perspective, we would have been just as happy with a branch on
my local hard drive! That would have taken longer to setup though.
You could have used git instead. There is a good integration
On 03/16/2010 07:05 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Wow, you guys are moving fast! Thats a good thing.
IRC is fine if you want to discuss something quickly. But it has its
limitations. For example, I cannot follow IRC most of the times
because I'm in a different time zone. But I don't want t
On 03/16/2010 03:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
One more thing which I wonder about even more is that this whole
merging happens so quickly for reasons I don't see right now. I don't
want to keep anybody from making progress but it appears like a rush
to me.
Meh - I think your just plain wr
On 03/15/2010 11:28 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
So, we have a few options on where to put Solr's new trunk:
Solr moves to Lucene's trunk:
/java/trunk, /java/trunk/sol
+1. With the goal of merged dev, merged tests, this looks the best to
me. Simple to do patches that span both, simple to setup
On 03/15/2010 08:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Right, Mark. I think we would be effectively raising the bar to some extent
for what it takes to be a committer.
That's part of my point though - some are contrib committers with a
lower bar - now they are core/solr committers with that lower ba
On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
This time a +1 without discuss :-)
Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
I had a whole spiel about earning merit, and some contrib committers
were made contrib co
Committers are competant in different areas of the code. Even mike
wasn't big into the search side until per segment. Commiters are
trusted to mess with the pieces they know.
I don't see anyone even remotely suggesting that users should have to
understand all of the implications of postin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12844516#action_12844516
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
bq. Also IRC is not logged/archived
I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Chris Male as a
contrib committer!
Chris has been making a lot of headway in cleaning up the spacial contrib
lately,
and hopefully now we can get more of those improvements into svn!
Congrats Chris, and welcome!
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidima
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843756#action_12843756
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
I'm assuming you would set an Analyze
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843729#action_12843729
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
bq. Question - does SOLR requires everyon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843717#action_12843717
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
bq. If we say Analyzer is mandatory, what
On 03/10/2010 01:48 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
I wrote that I defaulted to Whitespace for convenience reasons only. Now you
don't need to specify anything if you don't care how the content is indexed,
which is really the case for TONS of tests.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843331#action_12843331
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
Sweet!
> explore using automa
On 03/05/2010 03:43 PM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12842015#action_12842015
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
On 03/04/2010 11:34 AM, Goddard, Michael J. wrote:
// Question: why wouldn't this Span be found?
assertTrue("fourth range", spans.next());
assertEquals("fourth doc", 11, spans.doc());
assertEquals("fourth start", 2, spans.start());
assertEquals("fourth end", 6, spans.end());
Spa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841249#action_12841249
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2294 at 3/4/10 1:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841249#action_12841249
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
I can see the value in this - there a
For those committers that don't follow the general mailing list, or
follow it that closely, we are currently having a vote for committers:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/4722d3144c2e3a8b/vote_merge_lucene_solr_development
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839744#action_12839744
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2287:
-
bq. Breaks backward compatibility, so nee
getSubSpans() on that. I was thinking I ought to open a
Jira issue for this, attach the current patch, and just keep working.
Does this sound like something other users might find useful?
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
java-dev-return-46947-michael.j.goddard=saic@lucene.apache
+1 - I'd prefer this stay out of svn as well - I'd rather it go on the
wiki too - perhaps in the same place that you can find the formatting
file for eclipse and intellij.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On 02/25/2010 11:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
To me, this is stuff that can
/* TODO 3.0: change this default to true */
protected boolean calibrateSizeByDeletes = false;
Better to make these JIRA issues to avoid the miss?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-
nd, diving
into the WeightedSpanTermExtractor class and fiddling with it. If you
ever did have any code which attempted to recurse into these
structures, I'd be happy to get my hands on it.
Thanks again.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
S
On 02/20/2010 05:45 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Currently the tests run 1 jvm per test suite (eg, TestIndexWriter has
its own jvm), I believe, and we haven't seen test failures... so I
think for the most part tests are not interfering with each other
(messing up global state).
It should be les
at we should recurse into the Span is on the right track
- but it just gets fairly complicated quick. Consider
SpanNear(SpanNear(mark, miller,3), SpanTerm(lucene), 4) - if we recurse
in an grab the first SpanNear (mark, miller, 3), we can correctly
highlight that - but then we will handle lucene by i
+1 from me - I've put both releases through their paces - though
technically, there are a handful of files that look like they need
apache headers (css, html) that are reported by rat. I don't think this
is a new issue though, so I don't think its something we need to be that
picky about right now.
Nah, let's just make fuzzy not work in the qp by default :) And make
that back compat while your at it - while not abusing Version so that
it's used for something subjective :) wouldn't want to rile up Hoss.
I'm like 3/4 serious.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Feb 13, 2
Perhaps - one of the things they are supposed to be addressing is
extendability.
nio2 does have FileSystemProvider, which would actually allow you to
create a custom channel !
I have not dug in enough to know much more than that though.
*But*, another really interesting thing is that in Java 7,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12806387#action_12806387
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2239:
-
IMO, unless we see more reports where thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802011#action_12802011
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2226:
-
{quote}Mark, that is my understanding to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12801972#action_12801972
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2226:
-
Contribs back compat policy is that ther
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> At the same time, seeing how some people benchmark systems without tuning
> them and then publish their results, cfs may be safer.
>
>
Though at the same time you get nailed with a 10-15% indexing speed hit.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Any reason we don't offer update doc by query along with term?
Its easy enough to implement in the same manner - is there some sort of
gotchya with this, or is it just because there has been no demand yet?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-860-2.patch
> site should call project "Lucene Java", not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-860-1.patch
updated patch that also includes doc site level changes
> s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-2035.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Christopher!
> TokenSources.getTokenStream() does not ass
Other than what's left of the TokenStream issues, I think we just need a
compression solution - which shouldn't
be difficult.
- Mark
Robert Muir wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1657
>
> i just struckthrough the things that are done.
>
>
>> Mark, Robert: How far are we with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1922:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.4.1)
Flex Branch
> exposing the ability
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791939#action_12791939
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2035:
-
I'll commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2035:
Attachment: LUCENE-2035.patch
I've broken the new tests back out into there own file, chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791680#action_12791680
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2035:
-
Hey Christopher, why are you going through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-628.
Resolution: Incomplete
> Intermittent FileNotFoundException for .fnm when using rs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1942.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
> NUM_THREADS is a static member of RunAddIndexesThreads and s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791153#action_12791153
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-406:
We should update this and incorporate into Lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791152#action_12791152
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2035:
-
Thanks for the tests and fix Christo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2035:
Attachment: LUCENE-2035.patch
> TokenSources.getTokenStream() does not assign positionIncrem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2035:
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> TokenSources.getTokenStream() does not assign positionIncrem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-2035:
---
Assignee: Mark Miller
> TokenSources.getTokenStream() does not assign positionIncrem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12791115#action_12791115
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1769:
-
Would be cool to get this issue wrappe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2165:
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> SnowballAnalyzer lacks a constructor that takes a Set of Stop Wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790748#action_12790748
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
Sorry Earwin - to be clear, we don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790368#action_12790368
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. If you do take hold of it, do not hesi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789901#action_12789901
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2126:
-
> I disagree with you here: intr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789384#action_12789384
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. Something along these lines m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788951#action_12788951
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/10/09 9:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788951#action_12788951
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. That is, it adds a lot of duplicated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788908#action_12788908
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. LUCENE-831 still requires a st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788874#action_12788874
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
I don't know that back compat is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788846#action_12788846
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
My impression is that this is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12788762#action_12788762
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. with the exception of a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787767#action_12787767
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. not bind the cache so hard to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787763#action_12787763
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
But we still want its functionality - we s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787752#action_12787752
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/8/09 9:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787752#action_12787752
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
And what about the doubling up insanity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787748#action_12787748
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
bq. I think it does not hurt either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787740#action_12787740
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
I dont quite understand why we would hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787734#action_12787734
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/8/09 8:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787734#action_12787734
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
It looks like FieldCacheTermsFilterDocIdSe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787729#action_12787729
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2133:
-
A couple more quick notes:
I know
1 - 100 of 2676 matches
Mail list logo
