[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2221) Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12805034#action_12805034 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-2221: --- I ran the benchmark on a 6

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-871) ISOLatin1AccentFilter a bit slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521344 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-871: -- I've just quickly decompiled the ISOLatin1AccentFilter.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-871) ISOLatin1AccentFilter a bit slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521089 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-871: -- One possible (and probably large) speed up for this code would

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518636 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- > * I removed StandardAnalyzer.html "grammar doc&quo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518521 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- Absolutely -- the header was there only because I used Carrot2

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517577 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- Good news -- thanks for the test! > A faster JFlex-ba

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517515 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- This time I used Tortoise, but it made things worse :) I&#x

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r562378-patch-nodup.txt One more try -- this time without

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r562378-patch.txt I've attached another patch

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

> > > Mark -- have you tried the jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt patch with > your wikipedia diff test? That's the early one whose grammar was "dot for > dot" translated from the original JavaCC spec -- for further patches I did > some "optimizations", which seem to have broken the compatibility..

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517371 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- O -- only now I realized I made a really silly mistake

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517233 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- To be precise -- I'm not 100% sure that this is a bug in J

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517184 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- Thanks for more test cases. I guess the biggest problem here is

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt A patch for better compatibility

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516893 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- When digging deeper into the issues of compatibility with the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516762 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966: -- Thanks for spotting the differences, I'll add them to the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r561292-patch.txt Here is another (this time let's ca

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r560135-patch.txt Here's another patch (against r5

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: AnalyzerBenchmark.java Here is a very simple benchmark I used to test the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966: - Attachment: jflex-analyzer-patch.txt Here comes a somewhat rough (needing refactorings

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-966) A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer

Components: Analysis Reporter: Stanislaw Osinski Fix For: 2.3 JFlex (http://www.jflex.de/) can be used to generate a faster (up to several times) replacement for StandardAnalyzer. Will add a patch and a simple benchmark code in a while. -- This message is automatically

Re: Topic Maps/Clustering + Lucene... how?

p;CFID=48792235&CFTOKEN=73030559 Here's a paper on how Lingo performs compared to e.g. STC: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/osinski04conceptual.html Cheers, Staszek -- Stanislaw Osinski, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.carrot-search.com ---

Re: Topic Maps/Clustering + Lucene... how?

Lucene. Please let me know if you need more details or would like to set up a demo with your data source. Staszek -- Stanislaw Osinski, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.carrot-search.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]