[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634838#action_12634838
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1406:
-
Very cool. I've used a modified versio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634944#action_12634944
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1406:
-
Thought I would add the following comments:
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12635723#action_12635723
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1406:
-
I'll commit once 2.4 is released.
> ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641075#action_12641075
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1406:
-
Committed revision 706342.
I made some
cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew?
same rules apply: without using GPL data (i.e. Hspell data) you can't do it
right, but you can do a lot of the common stuff just like Arabic.
Tokenization is a tad bit more complex, and out of box western behavior is
probably annoy
On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew?
I'm interested as I use lucene for biblical research.
same rules apply: without using GPL data (i.e. Hspell data) you
can't do it right, but you can do a lot of the common
can you provide any more information on your use case? I had originally
imagined MH, ktiv male spelling only, but your use case is interesting.
Are you currently indexing biblical hebrew text? dotted or undotted?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:54 AM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 30
Robert Muir wrote:
can you provide any more information on your use case? I had
originally imagined MH, ktiv male spelling only, but your use case is
interesting.
Are you currently indexing biblical hebrew text? dotted or undotted?
Biblical Hebrew. Variety of texts. Some unpointed. Others w/ p
thanks for your feedback. below is a description of an idea for a biblical
hebrew stemmer that would work somewhat differently than a modern hebrew
stemmer.
With regards to pointing i can imagine a user might be frustrated if a word
is stemmed too aggressively when niqqud is present in query or te
: Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:19:35 AM
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apache
license)
cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew?
same rules apply: without using GP
Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apache
license)
cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew?
same rules apply: without using GPL data (i.e. Hspell data) you can't do it
right, but you can do a lot of the common stuff just like Arabic. Tokenization
ge
> From: Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:19:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apache
> license)
>
> cool. is there interest in similar basic functionality for Hebrew?
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008, Robert Muir wrote about "Re: [jira] Commented:
(LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apache license)":
> Thanks for clarification. With this method arabic analyzer could lemmatize,
> not stem, using buckwalter dictionary, and things like broken plural will
Can we have the Hebrew discussion on another thread? FWIW, I do agree
it would be a good thing to add.
Thanks,
Grant
On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008, Robert Muir wrote about "Re: [jira] Commented:
(LUCENE-1406) new Arabic Analyzer (Apac
14 matches
Mail list logo
