Just out of curiosity, did you try using Maven for more than
building? As I see it, the killer application is the development
environment intergration combined with release management and
dependency automation. These are the features that I hope will bring
people to the dark side.
I ended
My investigations into maven2 have led me to similar conclusions that
other's seem to have expressed: great tool, looks perfect for people
starting from scratch - solves lots of problems, most of which we've
already solved other ways ... training users to use the maven ways instead
of our existing
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.44 skrev karl wettin:
I'll see what I can do this weekend.
Should I do everything to keep the same file structure as now? It
would be easier if nobody have any opinions about restructuring to
Maven-style. Perhaps a script that set it up from the current?
--
karl
On 2/16/07, Sami Siren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/2/15, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> My first impression of maven:
> Pretty websites as part of the build system - cool! And it's
> *great* for starting
> a new project... unit tests automatically run, website is built,
> automatic
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Sami Siren wrote:
2007/2/15, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My first impression of maven:
Pretty websites as part of the build system - cool! And it's
*great* for starting
a new project... unit tests automatically run, website is built,
automatic packaging, j
16 feb 2007 kl. 11.17 skrev Sylvain Wallez:
Ant + Ivy [1] are as powerful and infinitely more flexible.
If you have the time and knowledge, feel free to do something with
it. Perhaps demonstrate the dependency stuff from Ivy with gdata, the
benchmarker or so. I don't mind evaluating multi
Sami Siren wrote:
> 2007/2/15, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> My first impression of maven:
>> Pretty websites as part of the build system - cool! And it's
>> *great* for starting
>> a new project... unit tests automatically run, website is built,
>> automatic packaging, jar/war build,
2007/2/15, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My first impression of maven:
Pretty websites as part of the build system - cool! And it's
*great* for starting
a new project... unit tests automatically run, website is built,
automatic packaging, jar/war build, everything you need!
But, it all se
Hi,
I don't want to disturb other folks from their meditation but I am all for
experimental maven build process for Lucene. If we are talking about mvn
(maven2) then I won't be able to help much (as I have hands-on experience
with maven1.x - btw is it possible to use Jelly in mvn? As far as I kno
07, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
> >> I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would
> >> solve /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my
> >> other projects. :) I'd be happy to help out , but there are some
> >> wicked anting
h m2.
Regards,
Lukas
On 2/15/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
> On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
>> I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would
>> solve /at least/ this problem. And it wou
karl wettin wrote:
However, I don't think that the Buddha defined Nivana as "good enough".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana, "It is a mode of being that is
free from mind-contaminants (Kilesa) such as lust, anger or craving."
That's not far from "good enough".
Doug
--
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:58:00 -0500, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
16 feb 2007 kl. 00.37 skrev Slava Imeshev:
My personal opinion is that Ant is good enough and that Java has
reached build automation
nirvana with it, just like C/C++ with make.
Did I start yet another tech-religo
16 feb 2007 kl. 00.37 skrev Slava Imeshev:
My personal opinion is that Ant is good enough and that Java has
reached build automation
nirvana with it, just like C/C++ with make.
Did I start yet another tech-religous war thread now? Sorry about that.
However, I don't think that the Buddha de
it's not really your call.
If I had a voice I'd vote for multi-threaded indexing in Lucene instead of
implementing
Maven builds.
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: Mave
www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=maven_refresher_course
- Original Message -
From: "karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Maven builds
15 feb 2007 kl. 23.03 skrev Steven Rowe:
I'll see what I can do this weeken
ROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Maven builds
>
> 15 feb 2007 kl. 23.03 skrev Steven Rowe:
>
> >> I'll see what I can do this weekend.
> >
> > "Maven" refers to two very different products. Which version to use
15 feb 2007 kl. 23.03 skrev Steven Rowe:
I'll see what I can do this weekend.
"Maven" refers to two very different products. Which version to use
ought to be a serious consideration.
Karl, do you mean to use Maven 1.X or Maven2?
Maven2. mvn.
--
karl
-
karl wettin wrote:
>
> 15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
>> On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
>>> I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would solve
>>> /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my other
>>
I think a POM for Lucene core and demo is pretty trivial, since there
are no dependencies, although I haven't tried Maven 2 yet. Contrib
modules w/ dependencies is a little bit harder and getting them all
to work together is a bit more on top of that.
We made the switch to Maven 1 at CNLP
15 feb 2007 kl. 21.24 skrev Yonik Seeley:
But, it all seems like magic to me... if I want to do something
different,
even a minor little change, I don't know where to start. If I want
to add an
additional compile flag, where does that go??? I have no idea. To
change the
behavior (like u
My first impression of ant:
Ok, the syntax is a little funky, and I can't re-use my knowledge of command
line options to tools w/o doing an exec... I need to learn the "ant" parameters
for all the different tasks now. I can look at a build.xml and tweak/fix it
because there isn't too much "magi
primary build system.
Doug
karl wettin wrote:
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would solve
/at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my other
projects. :) I'
15 feb 2007 kl. 20.27 skrev Erik Hatcher:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:10 PM, karl wettin wrote:
I would not mind introducing Maven builds in Lucene. It would
solve /at least/ this problem. And it would merge so great with my
other projects. :) I'd be happy to help out , but there are
24 matches
Mail list logo
