<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > karl wettin wrote:
> > > The code is filled with string equality code
> using == rather than
> > > equals(). I honestly don't think it saves a
> single clock tick as the
> > > JIT takes care of it when the first lin
A couple of responses to various comments in this thread...
: > Unless it object identity is what is being tested or intern is an
: > invariant, I think it is dangerous. It is easy to forget to intern or to
: > propagate the pattern via cut and paste to an inappropriate context.
interning the St
On 5/1/06, jian chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am wondering if interning Strings will be really that critical for
performance.
Probably not as much as it was for early JVMs.
The biggest bottle neck is still disk.
Depends on the index and workload. Queries are often CPU-bound.
-Yonik
ht
lity code using == rather than
> equals(). I honestly don't think it saves a single clock tick as the
> JIT takes care of it when the first line of code in the equals method
> is if (this == that) return true;
If the strings are intern() then it should be a touch faster.
If the string
karl wettin wrote:
The code is filled with string equality code using == rather than
equals(). I honestly don't think it saves a single clock tick as the
JIT takes care of it when the first line of code in the equals method
is if (this == that) return true;
If the strings are intern() th
30 apr 2006 kl. 04.48 skrev Tatu Saloranta:
JIT takes care of it when the first line of code in
the equals method
is if (this == that) return true;
In case where (this == that) is true, this may well be
correct, but:
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
... you are then assuming 100%
--- karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is filled with string equality code using
> == rather than
> equals(). I honestly don't think it saves a single
> clock tick as the
> JIT takes care of it when the first line of code in
> the equals method
The code is filled with string equality code using == rather than
equals(). I honestly don't think it saves a single clock tick as the
JIT takes care of it when the first line of code in the equals method
is if (this == that) return true;
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I can co
