[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1872:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1872-uwe.patch
Hi Mike, I made some small improvements in formatting and al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749238#action_12749238
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1862:
---
How about putting the package.html files on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749239#action_12749239
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872:
The new changes look good -- than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749240#action_12749240
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872:
---
Oh I thought you were still sleeping... Goo
Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing
--
Key: LUCENE-1875
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Analysis
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1875:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1875.patch
Patxh with changed end() javadocs. This patch also removes the {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1875:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusing
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749246#action_12749246
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872:
Good morning!
> Improve javadocs
Michael Busch wrote:
Hi all,
I just added a wiki page for a new feature I'd like to add to
Lucene. Please take a look at the link. I will add more details and
diagrams to the page, but for now it should give a rough idea about
how to implement it:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ParallelIncr
Cool stuff!
We should also think about how to do single document field updates or
field adds since that is the most common usecase - not that it needs
to be implemented in the first version, but kept in mind so we don't
box ourselves in.
Doug mentioned some ideas he had in passing almost a year a
That depends - the links may end up in summaries on different pages
(first sentence as an exaple) - it also provides a consistent
formatting for class names so that they pop silmialry everywhere. I
don't agree with "it makes no sense." I'd make every classname
everywhere a link if I could.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1855:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1855.patch
Here is the patch that implements generics for the Attributes AP
I cite the guide from Sun
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/writingdoccomments/):
--
Use in-line links economically
You are encouraged to add links for API names (listed immediately above)
using the {...@link} tag. It is not necessary to add lin
To add to my argument (and I'm not trying to get you to change this
patch by the way - its just javadoc, and I'm more interested in the
argument than the results this morning ;) )
You could make a similar argument that links from one method referencing
another in the same class are unneeded - you
I agree that its not necessary - and like I said in the other email -
I'm not actually trying to get you to change it (much more important
changes to argue for than javadoc), but I still disagree. I like those
links ;) In my judgment, I never know what I want as a link ahead of
time - I end up usin
No problem, see my other mail! I can revert the @link changes. By the way, I
noticed shortly, that @code is Java 5 only. So I could replace it by
.
For me the whole class Javadocs were a little bit over-linkified with links
pointing to the same class itself. I only wanted to remove links (as the
g
No, no, I wasn't arguing for a revert - more interested in exploring the
topic :)
If you think its cleaner, you did way more on the TokenStream API stuff
than me and I think your javadoc
pref on it should outweigh mine.
- Mark
Uwe Schindler wrote:
> No problem, see my other mail! I can revert t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749282#action_12749282
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1862:
-
Uwe, i think you are right, but the real proble
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749283#action_12749283
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1862:
---
+1
I was wondering why the analyzer is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1875:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1875.patch
Replaces {...@code ...} by javadoc 1.4 compatible .
Will commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749285#action_12749285
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1862:
-
bq. I think we can change this even in release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1865.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for finishing this.
> Add a ton of missing license headers throughout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1875.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 809381
> Javadoc of TokenStream.end() somehow confusi
Some contrib packages are missing a package.html
Key: LUCENE-1876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1876
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749291#action_12749291
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1876:
-
also db and remote
> Some contrib packages are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749292#action_12749292
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
As I already started to move Lucene to Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749293#action_12749293
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1862:
-
Just as an expansion on my feelings about any c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749294#action_12749294
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
About the backwards compatibility: After ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749294#action_12749294
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1855 at 8/30/09 10:49 AM:
---
Improve IndexWriter javadoc on locking
--
Key: LUCENE-1877
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Javadocs
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749301#action_12749301
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1877:
---
For IndexWriter/IndexReader this hint is no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749302#action_12749302
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1855:
-
bq. By the way, the generics for AttributeSourc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749303#action_12749303
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877:
-
My initial thought was also that it didn't real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749303#action_12749303
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1877 at 8/30/09 11:53 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749305#action_12749305
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
{quote}
>From the apache harmony project I
The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just wondering
why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or was
there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should just
deprecate whats been in a release, and change otherwise?
--
- Mark
http://www.lucid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749306#action_12749306
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
bq. From the apache harmony project I hope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749307#action_12749307
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1855:
-
no worries here either guys - far from the copy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749308#action_12749308
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1873:
-
Here is a rough draft - if you have any comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749312#action_12749312
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
{quote}
Michael: This was not in the commen
+1 How obvious!!
On Aug 30, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just
wondering
why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or
was
there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should just
deprecate
+1, we should remove them.
Mike
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> The spatial contrib has not been in a release before, so just wondering
> why there are deprecated classes in it - should we remove those, or was
> there a good reason to keep them? In general, it seem we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749322#action_12749322
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1877:
bq. Anyone remember why NativeFSL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749324#action_12749324
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1877:
---
Let's do it in the following way:
- depreca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1855:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1855.patch
bq. It was.
OK. I found it :-) - in the first version after che
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749328#action_12749328
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1855:
---
Uwe, I'm not home right now, will look toni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749330#action_12749330
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1877:
-
> Anyone remember why NativeFSLockFacto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749334#action_12749334
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877:
-
{quote}This interface follows the completely st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749336#action_12749336
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1877:
-
bq. People who use Lucene over NFS already have
I started trying out a list of sample features in the RC release emails,
but its really just a quick hack I pulled out. If anyone has any
suggestions of what they would like to see incorporated into the final
release feature list, let me know. Not the most import thing in the
world I know, but as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1873:
Attachment: LUCENE-1873.patch
first rough draft patch
> Update site lucene-sandbox page
> ---
remove deprecated classes from spatial
--
Key: LUCENE-1878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1878
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/spatial
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1878:
Attachment: LUCENE-1878.patch
removes the deprecated classes -
there were two public fields decla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1874:
Attachment: LUCENE-1874.patch
removes the outdated and empty section
> Further updates to the sit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749363#action_12749363
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1877:
-
> I can see how this is not ideal, but
: My question is, I would prefer to track SVN commits to keep track of
: changes, vs. what I'm doing now. This will allow us to stay weeks
: behind a Java release vs. months or years as it is now. However, while
: I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting all those
: comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853:
Attachment: LUCENE-1853.patch
Remove the dependency on PhraseQuery. Create a new Query called
"Su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853:
Description:
The goal is to give more control via configuration when searching using user
entered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Preetam Rao updated LUCENE-1853:
Remaining Estimate: (was: 336h)
Original Estimate: (was: 336h)
> SubPhraseQuery for m
59 matches
Mail list logo
