Hi,
at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
start a flamewar:
Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
And now seriously:
I did the last packaging of SOLR 1.4 for Debian and I intend to continue doing
so. Since I'm doing the packaging i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858104#action_12858104
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2399:
---
Hurra! You used the StringBuilder as buffer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858108#action_12858108
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2399:
---
I know, you were running the test without a
It's not up to Lucene and Solr, as it is an Apache Infrastructure thing. It is
also unclear as to provenance w/ GIT. So, even for all of GITs benefits, it's
a non-starter at this point Foundation wise, so no need for a flamewar at all.
For the record, yes, I deal with dozens of patches at a ti
Why can't people just use svn or mercurial as a client for subversion
repository?
What is the benefit of migrating repository itself?
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:20, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858130#action_12858130
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2399:
-
bq. I know, you were running the test without a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
I added some additional javadocs to try to explain the default behav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1215.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
I am marking this resolved as a duplicate of LUCENE-2399.
The new ICU Nor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858144#action_12858144
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1343:
-
OK! I think we have a good solution here!.
We
On 2010-04-17 12:57, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> Why can't people just use svn or mercurial as a client for subversion
> repository?
> What is the benefit of migrating repository itself?
I think CVS and SVN mentality is too deeply ingrained in the ASF culture
... To Thomas - use git-svn and the probl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
I made the filter non-final, and only incrementToken final instead.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-1343:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> A replacement for ISOLatin1AccentFilter that does a more thorough jo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858152#action_12858152
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2399:
-
Committed revision 935186.
Will later discuss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2399.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add support for ICU's Normalizer2
> -
>
>
Ahh you're right!
Though, really, we should not be converting to String (flex terms in
general are an arbitrary byte[], not necessarily utf8). We should
just use a BytesRef directly in the key.
Can you open an issue for this Tom? Thanks!
Mike
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Burton-West, Tom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858157#action_12858157
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2393:
Patch looks good Tom -- thanks fo
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at least since august 2009 nobody has dared to ask this question, so let's
> start a flamewar:
> Don't you think, it's time for lucene and solr to switch to GIT?
>
Since, you asked: No.
> And I wonder, if there are really people usi
Hi,
In my opinion: Definitely NOT!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [email protected]
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Koch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 9:21 AM
> To: solr-dev; [email protected]
Hi Thomas:
There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
All of apache projects are: http://git.apache.org/
You are free to use git. Apache is running a git-svn server somewhere,
although the repository itself is not git, but you can use it as one.
Hope this help
These are broken, by the way.
We need to kick someone to merge entries for lucene&solr and point
them to a new svn url.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:10, John Wang wrote:
> Hi Thomas:
> There is a git mirror already: http://github.com/apache/lucene
> All of apache projects are: http://git.
20 matches
Mail list logo