> "MD" == Moses DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MD> I agree. It is ugly. I would not want to use it myself. Still,
MD> you should have the right to use it if you want to. Microsoft
MD> should not be able to tell you how to run your software.
Yes, it should not but their goal i
You are not on the correct list. java-linux is for questions about
the blackdown port of Sun's JDK. You should post this question on
the kaffe mailing list. Look at http://www.transvirtual.com/maillist.html
so see how to get on the kaffe mailing list. If you just got your kaffe
build from the CVS
Yes, it is. First Microsoft threatened Sun about the Windows LAF in
swing. Then to "cover up" the first "mistake" Sun made the Mac LAF
only work on MacOS so that they would not have to put up with peoples
questions like "why can I use the Mac LAF on all systems but not the
Windows LAF?". When swin
Hello... I am trying to use kaffe, and tried to start out by running
hello world application + applet. The application runs fine, but
appletviewer won't run for me to check on my applet. Here's the error
message:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError: `[o with a tilde over it]A
at java
Wait a minute! Didn't Microsoft argue and win the point in the Apple
case that Look and Feel cannot be copyrighted or otherwise subject to
proprietary limitations? Is this another case of the big bully wanting
to have his cake and eat it too?
Bob McConnell
N2SPP
At 06:55 PM 1/18/99 -0500, Martin
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Martin Little wrote:
> Because they fear Microsoft will use it as an excuse?
Have you not heard of the "Look and Feel" lawsuits of the 80's?
In fact it was Apple who sued Microsoft claiming that win3.1
stole Mac's LAF for a GUI interface. The result was Apple lost
because yo
Because they fear Microsoft will use it as an excuse?
They know that Microsoft will sue them for infringing on their
look and feel. Much the same as Apple would probably defend
the Mac L&F if Sun had not put the same restriction on that
Swing L&F.
There is a large difference between trying to p
This is total BS. Microsoft did not write any of the swing code so they
are not in a position to "allow" anything. Sun wrote the code and now
Sun will not let you use it on non windows systems because they fear
Microsoft will just use it as an excuse to sue them. Where have you been
the last coupl
Sun promised everyone that all look and feels would work on all platforms.
Then they changed the code so that windows LAF and Mac LAF would only work
on a windows or mac system. Sun lied to us all. At any rate, you can
still make the windows or mac LAF work by making a small change to the
swing so
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Java News-collector wrote:
> You may have had Kaffe installed which resulted in the library complaint.
It's not a complaint, it's a segmentation fault. ;-)
> Caveate: I'm running Redhat on Intel platforms. If this experience
> doesn't apply on Sparc, I apologize for my igno
Najprej bi se vam rad opravičil, ker sem za način obveščanja javnosti uporabil
nenaročeno pošto (angl. spam), ki ste jo nekateri prejeli tudi večkrat. Na izbiro pa
nisem imel druge možnosti, saj me slovenski javni mediji niso podprli. Javnim medijem
sem poslal svoje prvo pismo, ki je v celoti o
I found this very useful:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/native1.1/index.html
--jason
On 15-Jan-99 Jinpeng Xie wrote:
> hi,
>
> I want to implement file permission in JAVA for linux. I know
> Java can call c function or system functions. However, I don't know
> the de
unsubscribe.
Check out
http://www.pg.gda.pl/~abies/jpm.html
for my idea how it can be done. Any comments welcome, but please do not
do it on the mail lists, but directly to me.
Artur
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:12:59 -0800 (PST), hackit usolame wrote:
>hey
>i did all what u told me , but its still not work (i added the path
>line to
>my profile) , and now i can execute the /jdk1.1.5/bin from every
>directory
>: but its still giving me error message well , this is the
hey
i did all what u told me , but its still not work (i added the path
line to
my profile) , and now i can execute the /jdk1.1.5/bin from every
directory
: but its still giving me error message well , this is the error
SecMgre:/jdk1.1.5/bin#./java (this is the command that i executi
Hi,
> > I did _not_ receive any configuration file patches
> > since release of TYA1.2.
>
> I could not get TYA to compile out of the box, as Nate suggested. This was
> becuase I had to set #defined FreeBSD in configure.in, as you suggest in your
> I am not a configure guru
``Me too''
> a
> What does "TYA: no space in inline coding" mean?
>
>
> Tnks!
> Amancio
That's a quite harmless msg: TYA pre-alloced a certain amount
of memory, but due of _inlining_ the complied method exhausted
this memory and so we need to realloc() for some more memory.
Cheers
Albrecht
unsubscribe.
Bill Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouldn't a modification to bash/sh/csh be more appropriate? Provided that
> your programs use system(), 'sh -c command', etc. instead of directly trying
> to exec*() a file, it'd work.
No, if you'll try compiling your own 2.0.x kernel (I've not tried 2
On 18 Jan 1999, Brian Jones wrote:
> If it is an issue you feel you can resolve, patch the Linux kernel and
> submit the changes.
It seems you could write a modified NFS server that offers the contents of a
class or jar file as part of the filesystem.. if you mounted this at /java,
you could just
Dimitris Vyzovitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for going astray, but I think that the kernell is unable to invoke
> classes that lie deep in a package structure. i.e., the classes have to be
> deafult package classes in order to be able to call them directly.
>
> For example. if you have
"J.P.Lewis" wrote:
> An additional thought:
>
> Suppose one writes a control panel or system utility
> using java. Conventionally this should be installed in
> /usr/bin or /usr/sbin.
>
> - Linux has the kernel facility that launches a .class path
> when it's name is typed. So one could install
You may have had Kaffe installed which resulted in the library complaint.
Do a "which java" to see if you are running Kaffe (it will be
/usr/bin/java rather than /usr/local/jdk...). Uninstall Kaffe and
uninstall libc5 if this is true. That should get you running.
Caveate: I'm running Redhat on
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
> > On some OSes, poll() has
> >turned out to be a performance dog compared to select().
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> Given that select must look through all of the fds+1 that you are selecting
> over and poll does not, a true "poll" should work much much faster
On 18-Jan-99 Lothar Klaffenbvck wrote:
> Microsoft dosen't allow SUN to use the Windows-L&F on Solaris-Unix. Maybe
> there is the same licence-problem on Linux. I suggest to use the Metal-L&F,
> so the user can see it at the first look that this is a high quality
> software.
Great answer, Lothar
Windows L&F is the only L&F that can't be used on any other platform
except WINNT,WIN95/98. It seems like Microsoft has copyrighted the
L&F. Check the specs on Suns website.
Cheers
Chris
Yago Diaz wrote:
> I have download the swing-1.1 package from javasoft and I installed it on my
> Linux box
If your still interested here is another source for
Java SNMP code.
http://www.alphaWorks.ibm.com/Home/
Christopher Hinds wrote:
> Try JDM Kit from Sun.
> Here is a brief description excerpt from the specs:
>
> "
> Java Dynamic ManagementTM
> Kit: Product Specifications
>
>
>From the FAQ in glibc 2.0.109:
>2.25. I need lots of open files. What do I have to do?
>
>{AJ} This is at first a kernel issue. The kernel defines limits with
>OPEN_MAX the number of simultaneous open files and with FD_SETSIZE the
>number of used file descriptors. You need to change these v
Hi,
> On some OSes, poll() has
>turned out to be a performance dog compared to select(). If anyone
>listening has the configuration and time to try Kevin's suggested test:
>it would be worthwhile to hack together a little benchmark to ascertain
>whether poll() will give us another reason to comp
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
>
> A few words to clear this up.
>
> > The kernel does support it. The only problem is that the JVM is using
> > select(2) when it should use poll(2).
>
> No, this is not correct. The 1.1.7 JDK for glibc uses poll and not select (I
> know because I rewrote it t
Microsoft dosen't allow SUN to use the Windows-L&F on Solaris-Unix. Maybe
there is the same licence-problem on Linux. I suggest to use the Metal-L&F,
so the user can see it at the first look that this is a high quality
software.
A few words to clear this up.
> The kernel does support it. The only problem is that the JVM is using
> select(2) when it should use poll(2).
No, this is not correct. The 1.1.7 JDK for glibc uses poll and not select (I
know because I rewrote it to use poll). The problem is that glibc 2.0
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Pavel Tolkachev wrote:
> Javasoft have not decide yet whether it is lawful to distribute Windows
> L&F on non-windows environment. To stay on safe side they embedded the
[snip]
> All the Best
> Pavel
>
> Yago Diaz wrote:
> >
> > I have download the swing-1.1 package from ja
Hi Ja Porting Team!
I know this was already asked a lot of times but I couldn't find a
note on your page about this. When weill be the jdk 1.2 for
availible for Linux i386 ? We are very interested to install it on
our cluster.
Best regards,
Andreas Petershagen
--
-
I've had the same problem..
The classpath from JDK conflicted with Netscapes.
I solved it by using a startupscript for Netscape were I specified
Netscapes classpath.
--
Martin Stenderup
You could just subclass the windows look and feel and return true rather than
changing it. this way you do not have to distribute your own versions of the class
files (which I am pretty sure is against the licensing agreement)
Michael Schubart wrote:
> > I have download the swing-1.1 package fr
Oh good lord, Microsoft was sued over this years ago. Look and feel is
dead in software.
By all means, make the change.
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Pavel Tolkachev wrote:
> Javasoft have not decide yet whether it is lawful to distribute Windows
> L&F on non-windows environment. To stay on safe side t
> I have download the swing-1.1 package from javasoft and I installed it on my
> Linux box with jdk-1.1.7-v1a and native_threads. I run the SwingSet and when I
> try to change to the Windows Look & Feel it gives me an
> unsupportedLookAndFeelException. Does it works for you?
>
Hi Yago,
try this
Javasoft have not decide yet whether it is lawful to distribute Windows
L&F on non-windows environment. To stay on safe side they embedded the
function
public boolean isSupportedLookAndFeel()
into all LookAndFeels. For WindowsLookAndFeel it looks like:
public boolean isSupportedLookAndFeel
On 18 Jan 1999, Yago Diaz wrote:
> I have download the swing-1.1 package from javasoft and I installed it on my
> Linux box with jdk-1.1.7-v1a and native_threads. I run the SwingSet and when I
> try to change to the Windows Look & Feel it gives me an
> unsupportedLookAndFeelException. Does it wor
Forgive what is probably a FAQ, but I couldn't find an answer in the
archives.
I installed jdk1.1.6_v1 on a vanilla RedHat 5.2 (sparc) system. It
complained about the libaries, so I also installed libc5. Now it dumps
core (SEGV). Please can someone suggest a fix, or a configuration which
_will_ w
> try to change to the Windows Look & Feel it gives me an
> unsupportedLookAndFeelException. Does it works for you?
Not supposed to. windows L&F is only supported on Windows platforms.
-- jaco greeff
IS e-Commerce Integration
Tel: +27 (0)11 283 5684
Cell: +27 (0)83 301 5005
"Don't relax! It's
I have download the swing-1.1 package from javasoft and I installed it on my
Linux box with jdk-1.1.7-v1a and native_threads. I run the SwingSet and when I
try to change to the Windows Look & Feel it gives me an
unsupportedLookAndFeelException. Does it works for you?
yago
___
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 08:41:18AM +, David Warnock wrote:
>
> Alan Cox one of the key kernel developers mentions a patch to allow a
> lot more file handles in his on-line diary at
>
> http://www.linux.org.uk/diary/
>
> I suggest youn try looking there (I think it will have more detailed
>
Interesting. I've just received a copy of IBM's Java Update e-mail
which says they're shipping a preview of JDK 1.2 for AIX, even though
it doesn't pass all of the JCK.
I wonder what their lawyers know that the Blackdown team doesn't.
Ron
---
DOWNLOAD! IBM JAVA(TM) 2 PORT FOR AIX - TECHNOLOGY
Herbert,
Alan Cox one of the key kernel developers mentions a patch to allow a
lot more file handles in his on-line diary at
http://www.linux.org.uk/diary/
I suggest youn try looking there (I think it will have more detailed
references if you go further back.
I also think I may have seen somet
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 11:56:30AM +0900, SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Herbert Xu) wrote:
>
> > We have an Java application here that uses around 3000 file
> > descriptors at once.
>
> > Unfortunately, the
> > JVM (117) under Linux is trying to select over >1024 file descriptors
48 matches
Mail list logo
