hat is best had with those that maintain the relevant components.
--
Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bution bug. It
is something that you should report to the psutils, nptl and/or kernel
folks, rather than redhat. I'm sure that will in turn result in a debate
as to what is right or wrong, but that is not a decision you'd want Red
Hat to make.
--
Christop
On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:35, Calvin Austin wrote:
> > NPTL does NOT provide better performances for Java. It only (but
> > that's VERY valuable) provides MUCH BETTER reliability.
> > Linux 2.4 is far from being an industrial O.S. for heavy load.
> > Waiting for 2.6 to see how much progress has been
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 08:15, Damien Lecan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get better performances from a linux plateforme and I am
> a little bit disappointed.
>
> I am testing a full J2EE application, ie 3 physical layers
> (apache/tomcat <=> jboss <=> oracle db ; 3 servers), and this is ve
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 17:12, Paul Tremblay wrote:
> This gets real tedious. And this is for just one application.
>
> I know with python, for example, you can just tell python to look in one
> folder for all the libraries.
>
> Is there a way to do this with java? Is there an easier way to creat
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:30, Calvin Austin wrote:
> I hope you guys are not confusing NGPT with NPTL :*)
>
> All JVMs can support NPTL with little or no change, NPTL is still an ongoing
> project but you can see a difference already with Redhat 9 and Suns 1.4.2beta,
> 1.4.1 will also work. I have
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 19:29, John Neffenger wrote:
Hi Bill,
Also, 2.5.x Linux has changes to their 1:1 model that greatly
increases scalability for dealing with a
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 19:29, John Neffenger wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> > Also, 2.5.x Linux has changes to their 1:1 model that greatly increases
> > scalability for dealing with a large number of threads.
>
> I was under the impression that Java application developers will have to
> wait for the Java
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 04:17, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:49:28AM +0200, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> > In my opinion:
> >
> > - you tested Blackdown-1.3.1 using green threads, but Sun JVM used
> > native threads. In Linux this makes a huge difference in terms of thread
> > scalability
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 18:40, Kent E wrote:
> Are there any IDE with a built-in Version Control in it? Version control
> that can be configured in the IDE?
Basically ALL the IDE's have built in support for version control tools.
You might want to read some of the information on the tools that have
to start up quickly.
Yes, although in those cases you likely would want to just compile the
app to native code.
--
Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:46:52PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 06:32:11PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > root wrote:
> > The 2.4 kernel uses 32 bit process ids, so that shouldn't be a
> > problem. Are there other precious resources you're worried about?
> > If not, there's
On 31 May 2001 16:09:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ?
>
> Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including
> more natural and efficient integration with native code,
> as well as faster startup and the ability to do some
> aggressive ahead-
On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's.
> Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this
> libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when JVM
> for Solaris makes use of sola
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 21:25:20 -0700 ed phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if
> you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate
> them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of
> the to
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered
> Java Technology-Based Application Server
> Java/Linux performance talk
> http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/conf/sessions/934/0-sf2001.jsp
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 17:21:41 -0500 Joi Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Christopher Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> Can anyone explain to me why having the file in the path set in
>> ld.so.conf shouldn't be enough?
>
> Heh. Try gettin
Okay, I'm writing some JNI code for some stuff using RT signals. I need to
do some sigtimedwaits, which then post as IO events to the JVM. My original
design was to have Java threads invoke something like waitForIO(), which
was a native method which did the sigtimedwait(). Unfortunately, this s
--On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 09:34:50 -0700 Nathan Meyers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zhihong Pan wrote:
>
>> I need jni in my java application. I created a shared library, and set
>> my library path (export LD_LIBRARY=/home/mydir/), but I still get the
>> following error message:java.lang.Unsatis
--On Tuesday, April 24, 2001 15:37:04 -0400 "Alexander V. Konstantinou"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just upgraded a test machine running RedHat 6.2 (with all the latest
> updates) to RedHat 7.1. I'm having trouble getting Sun JDK 1.3.0_02 to
> work in the new environment (blackdown 1.3.0-FCS
--On Thursday, October 05, 2000 4:55 PM +0530 Santosh Dawara
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if someone tried a
> Runtime.getRuntime().exec("java"); ?
> or Runtime.getRuntime().exec("javac");
>
> I get an IOException for the same.
> Wheras, native applications (like "ls" and "clear") work fine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 06:11:21PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Christopher Smith wrote:
> > - From Sun's perspective there would also be benefits: lower development
> > costs, better cross-platforms support on more platforms, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 08:14:45AM -0500, Steve Michael wrote:
> I realize that I go against the grain of most people on this list,
> but I would see that as a foolish move. I believe that there is
> plenty of room for open source software and commer
--On 09/05/00 16:45:49 +0200 Anders LindbXck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gurumurthi, Nandakumar skrev:
>> My problem concerns both Java and Linux, and I'm of the opinion that
>> this would be the ideal place to post the problem - " On linux, using
>> java, how do I create a Window that will *alwa
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Andrew Majercik wrote:
> Applications "tie" themselves to the console window in a parent/child
> relationship. (once the parent goes away, so do all the children!) What you
Actually, they are tied to the process which spawned them (typically
the shell)
--On Friday, July 28, 2000 11:56 AM -0700 Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Generally speaking, you want a window manager that behaves as much as
> possible like mwm. I've found that a lot of the older window managers are
BTW, the reason for this is that the A
--On Friday, July 28, 2000 12:28 PM -0500 Julio Cesar Aguilar Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using RedHat, XFree 3.3.6, and the latest IBM JDK 1.3 beta.
> When I started writing visual programs in Java I noticed some
> problems which I believe to be caused by AfterStep (1.8.1).
>
> I sw
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 01:12:14AM -0700, nilesh modi wrote:
> IS IT POSSIBLE TO WRITE A SPEECH RECOGNITION PROGRAM IN JAVA ? IF
> YES, PLEASE REFER ME A GOOD LITERATURE FOR IT .
http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/speech/
Please use lower case in all future communications.
--Chris
-
--On Thursday, July 06, 2000 11:56 AM -0700 Patrick Lacson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Newbie question: Is it possible to have an Access datbase file located on
> the linux box and connect to it using the free Sun JDBC-ODBC driver? If
> so where can I find more info.
The actual code using the
--On Wednesday, July 05, 2000 6:55 PM -0400 Jacob Nikom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My question is little off the usual java-linux topics and relates
> to the activity in Linux community.
>
> My company thinks about donating some of their applications to the
> Linux community. Where I can look h
--On Monday, July 03, 2000 11:58 PM -0700 Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
>> > I don't get it. That was the whole point of adding the
>> > System.identityHashCode() method to 1.1. It was designed
>> >
> I don't get it. That was the whole point of adding the
> System.identityHashCode() method to 1.1. It was designed
> to return a UID in the case that a class overloaded
> the hashCode() method. Now folks seem to be saying "oh,
> yeah that was changed for 1.2". Changed to what?
> How would you sug
--On Tuesday, July 04, 2000 1:37 AM +0100 Miles Sabin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mo DeJong wrote,
>> There seems to be a really serious bug in the
>> System.identityHashCode() method in all > JDK 1.2 releases
>> derived from Sun code. The problem only shows up in "high
>> load" situations. Basi
--On Monday, July 03, 2000 4:24 PM -0700 Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Exception in thread "main" tcl.lang.TclRuntimeError:
>
> (find) table entry "SomeObject.1512497281" mapped to an invalid
> entry,
I'm not familiar with the Jacl code base, but this error does not jibe with
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Christopher Smith wrote:
> > Ooops. Sorry for being confusing. I mean that MS has treated
> > Transvirtual quite nicely while Sun appears to have shunned
> > Transvirtual.
>
> Interesting observation.
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 08:48:13AM -0700, Larry Sanderson wrote:
> > with their own proprietary extensions. Despite the evil that MS
> > represents I have to say that they've treated Transvirtual MUCH better
> > than Sun.
>
> Do you mean Microsoft treated Transvirtual better than Microsoft treate
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:52:16PM -0400, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > The current implementation is almost 1.1-complaint and has parts of 1.2.
> > The Java spec is huge, of course, and getting the rest of the way to
> > a full implementation isn't a quick job. But, as far as I can tell,
> > Kaffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 12:02:11PM -0700, Todd Papaioannou wrote:
> Apart from gcj, which I am having trouble using with the jdk1.2.2 collection
> classes, does anyone know of any other methods of generating native
> instruction codes on linux from ja
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 10:15:08AM +0700, yangyuex wrote:
> Thanks very much!
>
> What's your mean:
>
> "which BTW
> sets *INTERRUPTED* flag in the Thread object,
> The use of the an instance variable is redundant since the thread
> already has
> a flag designed for that perpose."
>
> I also t
>If you make sure, you do not mask your SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2,
>you should be able to run fine. However, there is one caveat. Linux
>threads use SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 for their internal
>communication in some products. If your >product also uses them,
>you should see for alternatives.
Actually, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 11:27:00AM +0700, yangyuex wrote:
> I have several threads in one hashtable.
> When I remove one of them, whether this thread still consume CPU etc
> resources?
> That's to say, if I will not need one thread, whether I must st
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 11:16:56AM -0700, Matt Welsh wrote:
> No. I want to wrap a *C array* as a Java object - not the other way around.
> What you are talking about is getting a C pointer to a Java object.
> Not the same thing!
Oh, I misunderstood. My apologies. Yes, the reverse would be REALLY
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 01:10:20PM +0100, Miles Sabin wrote:
> Matt Welsh wrote,
> I guess that in principle it ought to be possible to tweak
> JVMs to special-case a priviledged class of byte[]s to allow
> them to be pinned for an extended interval without completely
> screwing GC, but I'm not at
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 05:30:52PM -0500, John Rousseau wrote:
> On Friday Mar 31, 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:14:47AM -0500, John Rousseau wrote:
> > > On Friday Mar 31, 2000, Natarajan SK wrote:
> > > Kevin Hendricks solved a very s
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:14:47AM -0500, John Rousseau wrote:
> On Friday Mar 31, 2000, Natarajan SK wrote:
> Kevin Hendricks solved a very similar problem for me. This is
> assuming that you are using native threads. Try linking in -lpthread
> explicitly on your link line (and make sure you don'
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 10:00:55AM -0500, James Caple wrote:
> For what it's worth, my experience has been that the Blackdown RC3 port is
> much more scaleable and stable than the Inprise Linux port. I'd place my
> bets on the Blackdown port for server-side performance and scaleability.
> Althoug
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 10:07:31AM +0700, yangyuexiang wrote:
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: HelloWorld (wrong
> name: examples/HelloWorld)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:442)
> at java
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 10:06:20PM +0700, yangyuexiang wrote:
> I download jasmin. It generated HelloWorld.class file.
> But I cannot run java HelloWorld.
>
> Is it due to the version of java?
> I use Sun/Inprise version java for linux.
The Sun/Inprise version should be fine. What is the error me
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 07:59:55PM -0500, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> Very good idea. However, how to separate Java from Java/Linux from
> Linux? Java/Linux from PC? Are you going to have different pages
> for those topics?
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean to break the information up
into sections
Hi there. I have collected various bits of info on running Java on
Linux and decided to put it all together on a site. It's still very
early on, so there isn't a ton of information, but I'd love to hear
feedback from people. It can be found at:
http://www.jlinux.org/
Please note that I'm aware t
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Jason Meisel wrote:
> HI i am working on a senior project using RMI and Servlets on a linux os
> running on a i86 machine... i have installed the jdk, jre, and rt, and have
> adjusted the PATH to reflect where to look...
> my problem is...
> when i type : javac Hello.java
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whenever I start Motif applications on my linux box the [RETURN] does not
> work, but strangely enough Control-J work. I basically have given up.
>
> Does XBD (X keyboard extension) cure this problem ?
> How can I see XBD ?
This sounds like it might
>What's an XBD?
The X keyboard extension.
--Chris
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Jackie Manning wrote:
> On my system, RH 5.1 updated to 2.0.36, jdk1.1.7-v1a, keyboard mnemonics
> do not function. The same
> programs function properly on my laptop, RH 5.1 - 2.0.35, jdk1.1.7-v1a.
>
> Can anyone give me a clue where to look for the problem?
I've got a frie
54 matches
Mail list logo
