Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-14 Thread shkanth
On Thu, 08 March 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, 06 March 2001, "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote: > > > > > SUn's Bug Parade did say that Swing on remote X IS slow. The workaround > > is not to use double-buffering: > > > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.h

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-09 Thread Andreas Micklei
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:36:11PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > do you reconize me you asses its me > > YOURS SINCERELY > Shivakanth $ cat >>~/.procmailrc :0 * ^From [EMAIL PROTECTED] idiots :0 * ^From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] idiots :0 * ^From: "Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> idiots --

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-08 Thread shkanth
On Tue, 06 March 2001, "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote: > > SUn's Bug Parade did say that Swing on remote X IS slow. The workaround > is not to use double-buffering: > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.html > > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Dan Kegel
"Martin, Stephen" wrote: > > > See the suggestions in > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.html > > Do any of those help? > > - Dan > > This and all the rest of the replies have been excellent. Clearly Sun is > aware of the problem and from reading the posts attache

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Joi Ellis
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > SUn's Bug Parade did say that Swing on remote X IS slow. The workaround > is not to use double-buffering: > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.html Something else to do is to use a stream compressor to compress the d

RE: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Martin, Stephen
> See the suggestions in > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.html > Do any of those help? > - Dan This and all the rest of the replies have been excellent. Clearly Sun is aware of the problem and from reading the posts attached to the bug it is clear that the user com

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
SUn's Bug Parade did say that Swing on remote X IS slow. The workaround is not to use double-buffering: http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4204845.html Nathan Meyers wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:35:32AM -0500, Martin, Stephen wrote: > > This isn't really a Blackdow

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Dan Kegel
"Martin, Stephen" wrote: > I've been trying to display a Wwing application through X-Windows from one > machine to another across an ISDN line. Performace is horrible, it takes a > long time to open windows, display menus and react to mouse events. Other > X applications including emacs and Mozil

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2001-03-06 15:48:55 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: > On 2001-03-06 08:35:32 -0500, Martin, Stephen wrote: > > Swing and/or AWT that causes this horrible performance. Is > > there anything that can be done about it. > > Use jdk 1.x s/1\.x/1\.1\.x/ Best regards Martin -- M

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Nathan Meyers
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:35:32AM -0500, Martin, Stephen wrote: > This isn't really a Blackdown problem but does relate to Java under Linux. > I've been trying to display a Wwing application through X-Windows from one > machine to another across an ISDN line. Performace is horrible, it takes a >

Re: Brutal X-Windows performance of Swing apps on slow links

2001-03-06 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2001-03-06 08:35:32 -0500, Martin, Stephen wrote: > Swing and/or AWT that causes this horrible performance. Is > there anything that can be done about it. Use jdk 1.x Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-2