Re: About the field of PhraseQuery

2005-06-20 Thread Paul Libbrecht
So why is there no such constructor PhraseQuery(String fieldName) and a method add(Token tok) ?? That would be much more intuitive I feel! paul Le 18 juin 05, à 09:44, Paul Elschot a écrit : It will throw an IllegalArgumentException when a Term is added with a different field, which is

Re: Search for documents where field does not exist?

2005-06-20 Thread John Haxby
Erik Hatcher wrote: On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please do not reply to a post on the list if your message actually isn't a reply. Post a new message instead. Sorry about that.. wasn't intentional.. clicked reply to get the reply address and then forgot to

Re: Problems with concurrency using Tomcat

2005-06-20 Thread Fred Vos
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:05:06PM -0400, Joseph MarkAnthony wrote: I have been struggling with this problem for months and have made no progress. I have created a simple web app for my Lucene indices that allow the user to rebuild or update the index. In the *same* web app (perhaps this is

RAMDirectory without positions or frequencies?

2005-06-20 Thread eks dev
Hi, I have a need for minimum memory footprint of the index during search (would like to have it in RAM). Good thing in the story, similarity calculation is not necessary, only pure boolean model is OK. I am sure I have seen somewhere one explanation from Doug about disabling norms... but cannot

Re: Lucene scoring bounds ??

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 18, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: I read the lucene-book about scoring and read a bit of the javadoc but I can't seem to find somewhere expectations of the bouds for the score value. I had believe the score would end up between 0 and 1 but I seem to keep having values

Re: md5 keyword field issue

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 19, 2005, at 5:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, i have an index with the following infos in it: url - keyword - Field(url, this.url, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED); md5 - keyword - Field(md5, this.url, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED); alt -

Implicit Stopping in StandardTokenizer??

2005-06-20 Thread Max Pfingsthorn
Hi! I've been trying to make an Analyzer which works like the StandardAnalyzer but without stopping. For some reason though, I still don't get words like is or a out of it... I checked with Luke (one doc in one index with the contents hello,this,is,a,keyword,hello!,nicetomeetyou. This should

Re: Re[2]: md5 keyword field issue

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 20, 2005, at 9:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Monday, June 20, 2005, 3:55:36 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Filters reduce the search space to a subset of the documents in the index. Which document would you want returned when there are multiple documents in the index with the same MD5?

Re: Implicit Stopping in StandardTokenizer??

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Max Pfingsthorn wrote: Hi! I've been trying to make an Analyzer which works like the StandardAnalyzer but without stopping. For some reason though, I still don't get words like is or a out of it... I checked with Luke (one doc in one index with the contents

RE: Implicit Stopping in StandardTokenizer??

2005-06-20 Thread Max Pfingsthorn
Hi! Here is the code: import java.io.Reader; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardTokenizer; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.LowerCaseFilter; import

Re: Re[4]: md5 keyword field issue

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Monday, June 20, 2005, 5:48:30 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Now you've just said the same conflicting thing a different way. You want to cluster but only return one. :) i think i missunderstood here the Term: cluster. so yes, i just want

Re: Implicit Stopping in StandardTokenizer??

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Max Pfingsthorn wrote: import java.io.Reader; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardTokenizer; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.LowerCaseFilter;

Re: About the field of PhraseQuery

2005-06-20 Thread Paul Elschot
On Monday 20 June 2005 08:57, Paul Libbrecht wrote: So why is there no such constructor PhraseQuery(String fieldName) and a method add(Token tok) ?? Tradition? That would be much more intuitive I feel! Regards, Paul Elschot paul Le 18 juin 05, à 09:44, Paul Elschot a écrit :

Configuration Strategies

2005-06-20 Thread Yousef Ourabi
Hello: I have a couple of quesitons on configuration strategies. I have a project where I have to deal with changing search requirements, for example one search may want to use term-vectors to find keywords like this or whatever, and the next may not. Another requirement is that when I call a

Re: Configuration Strategies

2005-06-20 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 20, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Yousef Ourabi wrote: Hello: I have a couple of quesitons on configuration strategies. I have a project where I have to deal with changing search requirements, for example one search may want to use term-vectors to find keywords like this or whatever, and the next

Strange Error Problem

2005-06-20 Thread Youngho Cho
Hello, I develop our system using lucene 1.4.3 with RemoteSearchable. Currently I got the following error message. But I don't konw why it happend and how to fix it. Could you explain what situation give the following error ??? Thanks. Youngho java.io.IOException: read past EOF at