I am using Quartz jobs to update the index with the new data and this
runs on a daily basis. So I need to figure out when exactly I should
create a new instance of IndexSearcher.
I had one more concern. I am not calling closing the searcher anywhere,
would this be causing any performance bottlen
I'll never join you!
Regards,
Pat McGovern
Did I understand your question, man?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Quaroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:24 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Join Me
And together we will rule the galaxy as father and
One possibility: if lucene runs out of memory while adding or optimizing, it
can leave unused files beind that increase the size of the index. A 64 bit
JVM will require more memory than a 32 bit one due to the size of all
references being doubled.
If you are using the compound file format (the def
Hi everybody!
We have a large Lucene index which gets updated very often.
Until recently the java virtual machine used to manage the index was on
32 bits, although the program was running on a 64bits station. Last week
we changed the java to 64 bits and since then we experience strange
problem
Rob,
If you don't find another command-line search/index tool for lucene,
you may want to look at these - very no-frills, but they do the job
for me. I've used with lucene 1.9-prerelease only.
= Don Gilbert
> Where can I find a command line index browser like lucli for Lucene 1.4?
http://cvs.
Rob Young wrote:
Is there no way to say "search on all searchable fields in every
document in the index" without explicitly providing a list of "all
searchable fields"?
You can programmatically get the list of searchable fields by calling
fieldNames(true) on IndexReader. From there it shoul
Chris Hostetter wrote:
There is some advice on this in the FAQ...
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-300f0756fdaa71f522c96a868351f716573f2d7
Is there no way to say "search on all searchable fields in every
document in the index" without explicitly providing a list of "all
s
Ooops, wrong address ... that was supposed to be to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Quaroni wrote:
And together we will rule the galaxy as father and son?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subjec
Dan Quaroni wrote:
And together we will rule the galaxy as father and son?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Join Me
42!
: I downloaded the source code of 1.4.3 but did not find the source of
: RangeFilter.
: I could not find it in the sandbox either?
:
: RangeFilter, where art thou?
RangeFilter was commited to the core, but after 1.4.3 was released...
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/or
I downloaded the source code of 1.4.3 but did not find the source of
RangeFilter.
I could not find it in the sandbox either?
RangeFilter, where art thou?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
Hello
I am building a search api that will search against content that was
indexed using the StandardAnalyzer. I am trying to simulate the same
filtering that occurs when the index was created on the search string. I
am using the StandardTokenizer and StopFilter. The problem I'm
encountering i
:
: If I have a document with a number of fields in it, is there a way to
: say that I want to search for a term across all those fields without
: stating the terms explicitly?
There is some advice on this in the FAQ...
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-300f0756fdaa71f522c96a86
: There is a lot of caching data in each index searcher. For large
: index, it's definitely a waste to re-create index searcher every time.
this is particularly true when you do sorts on specific fields, anytime
you sort on a field, your searcher/reader loads a FieldCache for that
field which con
And together we will rule the galaxy as father and son?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Join Me
-
To uns
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
If I have a document with a number of fields in it, is there a way to
say that I want to search for a term across all those fields without
stating the terms explicitly?
Detail:
I have multiple different types of products (cds, dvds, games, books
etc.) each different product has differen
Hi I have tried as suggested and isolated Digester from Lucene. Digester
doesn't trigger an Element Matching Pattern for each element only the last one
of each repeating tag.My XML (trimmed a bit looks like this):
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
Spring 1995 (Vol. 17, No. 1)
Pub
Hi,
I am implementing a Google Adwords-like Text Ad thing.
In Adwords, advertisers enter keywords and phases in
their ads. When visitor visits a webpage with
potential Google text ads, I want to know how they
link the webpage to the actual text ads? Linking those
text ads to the webpage is easy, th
Yes. The best approach is not to create index searcher for every search.
To get the updated documents, you may use an back ground thread to
check for new documents, or simple create an new index searcher
periodically. And then switch the new index searcher with the old one.
This sounds complicate
Hi Chris,
I am initializing IndexSearcher every time the search is executed. The
below is the search related code that is in a singleton class:
public Hits searchDocuments(DocumentSearchCriteria searchCriteria, List
companies) throws ApplicationException {
Hits hits = null;
S
Hi,
Where can I find a command line index browser like lucli for Lucene 1.4?
I tried to use lucli but it's using the 1.3 library and it isn't working.
Thanks
Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
Le 20 oct. 05, à 05:17, anushri kumar a écrit :
Thanks for the advice..the book looks good..hopefully it will be of
help.
One particularly helpful feature for impatient people like me is this
note that I saw on lucenebook.com: if you order by Manning, you get the
eBook.
The eBook is a simple
Thank you Otis. Just for the record, I found out that...
/"Fedora Core 4 users are advised not to use the Java RPM provided by
Sun[...]"
/Using Jpackage solved the problem. Details are provided in
http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/index.php/JPackage_Java_for_FC4
SJ
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hell
24 matches
Mail list logo