Thank you Chris. That seems like a good suggestion. I will try to pass a
different Query object to the Highlighter api that the one used for
searching.
I plan to break down the HTML document and store the title/sub
title/content in different fields of the index. So if I create a new
query com
That's good enough for me. At this point, going with a reasonably stable
branch rather than using my code appears to be the more conservative
option considering our release timeframe (which allows for extensive
testing).
Thanks for the help (and the excellent book).
Colin
-Original Message--
Trunk of Lucene is very stable, more so than 1.4.3 I've heard.
Is 1.9 release close? Hard to even say. It could be. No
substantial changes to the trunk before 1.9 is officially released
are planned that I know of.
Erik
On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Colin Young wrote:
That would
That would probably explain things. Is 1.9 close, or are we still
talking months aways? Unfortunately, what I'm trying to do is use the
code for Berkeley DB Java Edition which, best as I can tell was only
ported against the 1.9 code, so it looks like my choices are to do the
port myself, or check o
Daniel,
you can simply ignore this message. It only says that you have term
vectors enabled and add one ore more "empty" documents without a body.
If you don't need term vectors for any special operations on index
terms, switch this feature off.
Bernhard
Daniel Cortes wrote:
Hello everybo
Hello everybody and happy new year!
My first question about lucene in 2006 is the next:
What I have to do with the message "No tvx file". Every night I have to
do a complete indexation proces of a forum in phpBB.
For example in an indexation of 93 documents (posts in Forum phpBB) i
see 4 messag
I haven't checked the specifics, but many of the contrib (the
"sandbox" is the old name for it) projects have upgraded their latest
code to be against the trunk of Lucene, which is destined to be
Lucene 1.9. You'll need to either grab a previous JAR built before
the codebase changed, or up
