Hi
I am new to Lucene only been using it for 2 Days now. I got the Lucene in
Action Book whitch got me on the road.
I am currently having troble trying to do the following:
1. I indexd my Files to the RAMDirectory, then close the Index Writer.
2. Documnets have only 2 Fields. "filename" which
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for your reply.
Still iam facing problem with lucene 1.9.I have downloaded binaries as
well as source code.
When iam trying to run the binaries.Iam getting an error.
I have followed the your instructions .
I have deployed the luceneweb.war in tomcat.Iam getting the front-end
l
Hi,
Unfortunately I can't change the way things are indexed, so I guess I
need some short of utility class that will turn Martínez into
Martínez and then just search for that term.
I have also this problem using the StandardAnalyzer:
If I search for "cádiz" in luke the query gets parsed as
I don't see how to adjust the value of IndexWriter's
WRITE_LOCK_TIMEOUT in 1.9. Since the property
org.apache.lucene.writeLockTimeout is no longer consulted, the value
of IndexWriter.WRITE_LOCK_TIMEOUT is final, and there's no setter,
what's the deal?
Bill
---
Hi all,
I was using lucene-1.9-rc1-dev.jar (got it from luke website I think).
I was running a query whose tostring() was:
-body:angel -body:darpa -body:protocol +MatchAllDocsQuery1.0
When I upgraded to 1.9.1, I am getting an exception:
ava.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
at
org.a
On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:25, eks dev wrote:
...
>
> PS1: If you are interested in compressed bit sets, try
> to search for "utilities for compact sparse filters
> lucene"
Or look here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-328
Regards,
Paul Elschot
--
On 3/9/06, Yang Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
> Thanks very much for your suggestion. The query boost works great for
> keyword matching. But in my case, I need to rank the results by date and
> title. For example, title:foo^2 abstract:foo^1.5 date:2004^3 will only boost
> the document
Hi,
Exactly,
I have already implemented in my application using annotations.
and some changes to query input in my application.
I don't see where you provide Analyzer annotation. It seems u forgot it.
Nice coincidence.
Jelda
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Fitzsimmons [mailto:[EMAI
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:54, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Øyvind Stegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - How does many stored fields eventually affect indexing/query
> > performance compared to if no fields were stored (only indexed) ?
>
> Additional stored fields should have no effect on
On 3/9/06, Øyvind Stegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - How does many stored fields eventually affect indexing/query performance
> compared to if no fields were stored (only indexed) ?
Additional stored fields should have no effect on querying (the
internal information about a field is looked up
Searchable is a toolkit for Lucene that harnesses the power of
annotations to specify what properties to index and how to treat them.
A sample annotated interface:
public interface Sample extends Searchable {
public Integer getId();
@Indexed(boost=2.0F)
public String getName();
@Indexed
On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:55, Samuru Jackson wrote:
> Is there a way to save an object to the a lucene index?
>
> In my project I noticed that the performance bottleneck is my
> database. Lucene gives back a result in no time but to retrieve the
> corresponding data sets at the backend in the da
On 3/9/06, Raul Raja Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I have a lot of html indexed such as:
>
> Martínez
>
> Of course my users are gonna search for Martínez and they're not gonna
> get a match.
>
> Is there a common approach to solve this kind of problem in lucene,
> Maybe some utility cla
On 3/9/06, Samuru Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to save an object to the a lucene index?
Any field may be stored as well as indexed, or stored and not indexed.
If a field is stored only (not indexed), you can opt to store it as
binary or compressed binary.
See the JavaDoc fo
I'm using the following java options:
JAVA_OPTS='-Xmx1524m -Xms1524m
-Djava.awt.headless=true'
--- Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is your Java max heap size set to? This is the
> -Xmx Java option.
>
> Daniel Feinstein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My lucene index is not big (about
Is there a way to save an object to the a lucene index?
In my project I noticed that the performance bottleneck is my
database. Lucene gives back a result in no time but to retrieve the
corresponding data sets at the backend in the database can take long
especially if you need to execeute many que
What is your Java max heap size set to? This is the -Xmx Java option.
Daniel Feinstein wrote:
Hi,
My lucene index is not big (about 150M). My computer has 2G RAM but for some reason when I'm trying to store my index
using org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory it fails with java out of memory
Just a short one, it rocks in some cases (when actual
BitSet/IntSet is compressable, long runs of set or
clear bits...). Very good general BitSet
representation
I have tried it and found no bugs so far (+- 2 months
of using it)
Unfortunately, there is an issue with Licence (not ASF
compatible :(
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:31:23AM -0800, Raul Raja Martinez wrote:
> Hi I have a lot of html indexed such as:
>
> Martínez
>
> Of course my users are gonna search for Martínez and they're not gonna
> get a match.
>
> Is there a common approach to solve this kind of problem in lucene,
> M
Hi,
My lucene index is not big (about 150M). My computer has 2G RAM but for some
reason when I'm trying to store my index
using org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory it fails with java out of memory
exception. Also sometimes for the same
search query time spent on search could raise in 10-20 tim
Hi I have a lot of html indexed such as:
Martínez
Of course my users are gonna search for Martínez and they're not gonna
get a match.
Is there a common approach to solve this kind of problem in lucene,
Maybe some utility class or something?
Any help is appreciated.
Best regards.
Raul.
I am about to evaluate Lucene for replacing
current IR system of Belgian Poison Center.
We are used to manage query refinements by
combining different searches with boolean
operators: we thus have to store the results
(or otherwise to remake them). Our current
software does this by paging compres
A little while ago I announced the existence of the Aperture project,
founded by my company together with the DFKI institute.
We just released Aperture 2006.1 alpha 2, which may be of interest to
all Lucene users dealing with crawling and text extraction.
The project page is located at:
Hi Haritha
Hope the following helps:
Build Lucene Core from SVN
Download the lucene Subversion repository from:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk
Note: The CVS repository is still accessible but is out of date.
I downloaded to:
C:\src\lucene-svn\
To build (using ANT):
cd C:\sr
Hi,
I have downloaded lucene 1.9 version .please tell me how to build it.Iam
finding so many errors in lucene 1.9 source code.
Thanks.
Haritha
DISCLAIMER:
This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the
intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTI
hey,
i ran a small test and i have
12,055,022 terms in the index,
i have a strong feeling that the OS is not allowing the
new Term[12055022]
allocation
JVM - 64bit
Linux - 16GB RAM
any ideas?
Andrew Schetinin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
That'
On Mar 8, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Urvashi Gadi wrote:
I am trying index and search a phrase (multiple words seperated by
spaces). How should i index it so that it remains atomic. I have
observed that if i index the phrase are keyword, lucene doesn't let
me retrive the phrase in search.
Please
Hello Erik,
Thanks for your info.
It passed !.
Thanks again,
Youngho
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: RangeQuery, FilterdQuery and HitCollector
> Youngho,
>
> Try the lasted trunk codebase. I have
FilteredQuery has the side effect of passing zero scoring docs to the
hitcollector.
This does break the contract for HitCollector.collect method because the
JavaDocs state:
"Called once for every non-zero scoring document, with the document
number and its score."
The quick fix is to simply add a t
Youngho,
Try the lasted trunk codebase. I have recently applied a contributed
patch to FilteredQuery. Using the latest codebase, your test passes
for me.
Erik
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Youngho Cho wrote:
Hello,
I would like to use a Filter for rangeQuery ( to avoid potentia
30 matches
Mail list logo