On Mar 12, 2006, at 1:27 AM, wu fox wrote:
Hi:
I have tow indices A and B. Field title is in index A and field
label
is in B.Now I'd like to search with query title:XXX AND
label:XXX,surely I
expect search title:XXX in index A and label:XXX in index B.Is
there
any Lucene API can help
Representing an object graph in Lucene is not straightforwardly
possible. I recommend you consider flattening your object graph in
order to index it using Lucene. This will denormalize it, but that
is not a problem.
Erik
On Mar 10, 2006, at 1:39 PM, James Cook wrote:
Is there
: What would be the easiest to achieve that?
The easiest way is to do the search 10 times, and use either a Filter or a
BooleanQuery with a mandatory companyId:XXX clause in each to restrict the
results.
Which appraoch you take depends on how many total companies might be used
over time, and
I thought I'd post some good news about MMapDirectory as
the comments in the release notes are quite downbeat about
its performance. In some environments MMapDirectory
provides a big improvement.
Our test application is an index of 11.4 million
documents which are derived from MARC
thank you Erik
2006/3/12, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mar 12, 2006, at 1:27 AM, wu fox wrote:
Hi:
I have tow indices A and B. Field title is in index A and field
label
is in B.Now I'd like to search with query title:XXX AND
label:XXX,surely I
expect search title:XXX in
thank you Yonik
2006/3/12, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/11/06, wu fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi :
I'd like to search several indices located at diffrence partition.Ithink
use MultiSearcher is the right way.But when I inspected the source code
of
this class,I was confused
Lawrence,
Thanks for the LIA compliments.
In addition to what Paul and Chris already mentioned, keep in mind open files
(also covered in LIA). If you have 100K separate indices, that means a lot of
open file descriptors. One common index doesn't have this problem. Separate
indices are still
