Frank Kunemann wrote:
Hi lucene users,
just wanted to know if there is a simple way to find out which field(s) of a
document matched the query.
In our case we have different content fields and the user can choose whether
he wants to search in all of them or just in one.
To keep the index as smal
On 5/31/06, Heng Mei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Lucene do any caching of Document fields during a search?
No... but it wouldn't be too difficult to make your own cache, or use
Solr which does have a Document cache (among other types of caches).
-Yonik
http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr
Alberto,
It might be helpful if you would provide the full stack-trace.
We use Lucene with our web application like many other projects. I can assure
you that there is no basic incompatibility, but you may indeed be experiencing
something specific to your environment.
-h
Alberto Marqu�ff
On 5/31/06, Andrew Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tracked down the inefficiency to MultiTermDocs.skipTo where even in the
comment it said the function was unoptimized,
Yikes! That's pretty important given how BooleanScorer2 is
implemented (use of skipTo almost exclusively).
Could you ple
Hello,
We (Technorati) are looking for good search/IR/NLP/Comp. Linguistics/Data
Mining-type people. If you are interested, please email me your CV.
Otis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Rest assured that Lucene has no incompatibilities with JSF or any
other Java web technology. I don't have specific advice for you
since I do not use JSF, but all Java web applications require
dependent libraries be in WEB-INF/lib. Again, the error message
you've shown has nothing that poi
Hello Otis,
Thank you for the hint. I have made a custom analyzer which uses a
custom tokenizer similar to CharTokenizer - it treats brackets as token
characters, but removes them in the next() method. This is because I do
not want to split the word when adding it to the index. It seems to work
ok
Could someone give me a short explanation of the IndexWriter methods
setCommitLockTimeOut() and setWriteLockTimeOut() in Lucene 2.0 and how
they affect indexing.
Thanks,
Charles
Are there any plans to incorporate new advances in ontology-based information
retrieval into Lucene?
For example, Hobona et al. (2006) present a 3D portal that uses the WordNet
linguistic ontology to search Z39.50 servers. Another successfull
implementation of ontology-supported search is prese
Hi lucene users,
just wanted to know if there is a simple way to find out which field(s) of a
document matched the query.
In our case we have different content fields and the user can choose whether
he wants to search in all of them or just in one.
To keep the index as small as possible we don't s
The code works with a Java class main(). But to the being executed from JSF
this not saying to me that there are problems of mutual incompatibility when
recommending to me
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Jun 1, 2006, at 4:29 AM, Alberto Marquÿe9s wrote:
> That is truth but whe
I cosay works with a Java class main(). But to the being executed from JSF this
not saying to me that there are problems of mutual incompatibility when
recommending to me Tapestry.
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Jun 1, 2006, at 4:29 AM, Alberto Marquÿe9s wrote:
> That is trut
On Jun 1, 2006, at 4:29 AM, Alberto Marquÿe9s wrote:
That is truth but when executing from jsf it gives east error. I
want to know if pués is some subject of mutual incompatibility from
a class main works these sentences are the adapted ones to execute
from an application Web?
There i
First of all you must understand that there is two stage: creating
index and searching by it.
I tell you olny how to create index.
To perform search you must do something like this:
IndexSearcher isearcher = new IndexSearcher(directory);
Query query = QueryParser.parse("text", "fieldname", analy
That is truth but when executing from jsf it gives east error. I want to know
if pués is some subject of mutual incompatibility from a class main works these
sentences are the adapted ones to execute from an application Web?
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: This is not a Lucene issue..
On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Chun Wei Ho wrote:
I use Hits to search for and get documents matching a particular
query, e.g.:
Hits hits = indexSearcher.search(new TermQuery(new Term
("startswith","A")));
but it is not returning all the matching documents in the index. From
experimentation it
This is not a Lucene issue... the stack trace mentions nothing about
Lucene.
Erik
On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:33 AM, Alberto Marquÿe9s wrote:
Problems with Lucene executing from Web with jsf. I do not
understand because perhaps Lucene cannot be used in applications Web?
This is the
Hi,
I use Hits to search for and get documents matching a particular query, e.g.:
Hits hits = indexSearcher.search(new TermQuery(new Term("startswith","A")));
but it is not returning all the matching documents in the index. From
experimentation it appears to return about less than half the match
Problems with Lucene executing from Web with jsf. I do not understand because
perhaps Lucene cannot be used in applications Web?
This is the instruction that gives error:
IndexSearcher oIndexSearcher = new IndexSearcher("C:\\opt\\index");
Query query = QueryParser.parse(sCadenaBusqueda
Hi Alexey,
I want to search string into "TITLE" field only then how should add this
field to doc.
Regards..
Amaresh
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Sorokin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:21 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to craete index wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
