When i use the standardAnalyzer storage size increases.how can i minimize
index store
Sebastin wrote:
>
>
> String outgoingNumber="9198408365809";
> String incomingNumber="9840861114";
> String datesc="070601";
> String imsiNumber="444021365987";
> String callType="1";
>
Hi Andreas,
I am very interested in the multiple index file index/search.
Can you kindly help me on following questions?
1) Why you use multi index files? How much is the performance gain for
both indexing and searching? Someone reported that there no big
performance difference except the n
On 6/19/07, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, The announcement has not made it to the http://
lucene.apache.org/ page.
I just committed this. It should be viewable in about an hour.
Note: I had to change the syntax slightly... I'm using forrest-0.8
now, and apparently it doesn't allow
I have been working on extending the Highlighter with a new Scorer that
correctly scores phrase and span queries. The highlighter is working
great for me, but could really use some more banging on.
If you have a need or an interest in a more accurate Highlighter, please
give it a whirl and let
Release 2.2.0 of Lucene is now available!
Many new features, optimizations, and bug fixes have been added since 2.1,
including "point-in-time" searching, payloads, function queries and new
APIs for pre-analyzed fields.
The detailed change log is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/
>> Any one knows of a content summarization library.
Take a look at LingPipe
(http://alias-i.com/lingpipe/).
I'm afraid LingPipe doesn't do content summarization.
Basically, it's an AI-hard problem as you
need fairly deep understanding in order not to
produce word salad. Here are two relati
That works, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:57 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: MultiSearcher holds on to index - optimization not one segment
On 6/19/07, Beard, Brian <[EM
Hi Jes,
Jesse Prabawa wrote:
> The Lucene FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
> mentions that the position of the matches in the text does not affect
> scoring. So is there anyway that I can make the position of the
> matches affect scoring? For example, I want matches that occur a
String outgoingNumber="9198408365809";
String incomingNumber="9840861114";
String datesc="070601";
String imsiNumber="444021365987";
String callType="1";
//Search Fields
String contents=(outgoingNumber+" "+incomingNumber+" "+dateSc+"
"+imsiNumber+" "+callType );
//Displa
Hi Sebastin,
Sebastin wrote:
> i index my document using SimpleAnalyzer() when i search the Indexed
> field in the searcher class it doesnt give me the results.help me to sort
> out this issue.
>
> My Code:
>
> test="9840836598"
> test1="bch01"
>
> testRecords=(test+" "+test1);
>
> docum
Hi Erick,
thanks for your reply.here is the searcher class to search the
document
Directory fsDir = FSDirectory.getDirectory(indexDir, false);
IndexSearcher is = new IndexSearcher(fsDir);
QueryParser parser=new QueryParser("testRecords",new SimpleAnalyzer());
Qu
Show us the code you use to index. Are you storing the fields?
omitting norms? Throwing out stop words?
Best
Erick
On 6/19/07, Sebastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Does anyone give me an idea to reduce the Index size to down.now i am
getting 42% compression in my index store.i want to reduc
Assuming you've got two analyzers ...just see the javadoc for
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper. It's pretty easy once you have the
magic class name...
Best
Erick
On 6/19/07, Sebastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
could you briefly tell me how to write two analyzers for the two field
Paulo Silveira-
You still haven't described how often you need to index and why.
That's critical. If you have an index that only needs to be updated
every month, many of your concerns disappear. If it needs to be
updated every 5 seconds, it's another matter entirely.
So which is it?
Best
Erick
On 6/18/07, Chew
Hi Does anyone give me an idea to reduce the Index size to down.now i am
getting 42% compression in my index store.i want to reduce upto 70%.i use
standardanalyzer to write the document.when i use SimpleAnalyzer it reduce
upto 58% but i couldnt search the document.please help me to acheive.
Tha
I recommend you get a copy of Luke (google Lucene, luke) and
examine your index. Luke will also allow you to see how various queries
parse. Since you haven't shown how you parse your query,
anything anyone says would be a guess.
But at a guess, you may be having troubles with capitalization
in yo
On 6/19/07, Beard, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This may seem like a naïve question - since the garbage collection is not
enforcable, is it possible to send a flag to the IndexReader to give this up
once the reader is no longer needed?
You call close() on the IndexReader (or the IndexSear
This may seem like a naïve question - since the garbage collection is not
enforcable, is it possible to send a flag to the IndexReader to give this up
once the reader is no longer needed?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley
Sent:
could you briefly tell me how to write two analyzers for the two field
Paulo Silveira-3 wrote:
>
> On 5/25/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper
>>
>
> that was fast! thanks!
>
>
>> http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/
>> or
On 6/19/07, Beard, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I'm having is once the MultiSearcher is open, it holds on to
the index file
An IndexReader holds open the files... this is a feature. Not holding
the file open would mean that the index would actively change while
being searched.
We're using a MultiSearcher to search against multiple lucene indexes
which runs inside of a web application in jboss 4.0.4.
We're also using a standalone app running in a different jboss server
which gets periodic updates from an oracle database and updates the
lucene index.
Both the searcher a
Hi,
thanks guys for helping me.
I forgot to use back the same analyzer for searching, that's why I can't
search for Chinese words.. :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 4:37 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene
Hi,
The Lucene FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ mentions that
the position of the matches in the text does not affect scoring. So is there
anyway that I can make the position of the matches affect scoring? For
example, I want matches that occur at the beginning to weigh more th
Optimized index vs un-optimized actually is very much like searching
on one optimized index vs MultiSearcher on multiple optimized indexes.
Each segment is like a small index. If you just add them together,
they just behave like multiple indexes. If segments number is small,
like 3, there won't b
Hi All,
i index my document using SimpleAnalyzer() when i search the Indexed
field in the searcher class it doesnt give me the results.help me to sort
out this issue.
My Code:
test="9840836598"
test1="bch01"
testRecords=(test+" "+test1);
document.add("testRecords",testRecords,Field.Store
25 matches
Mail list logo